View clinical trials related to Substance Use Disorders.
Filter by:Our proposed evaluation study is designed to evaluate the impact of a recently completed stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, conducted at Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), of an intervention to improve care and management of patients with drug use disorders (DUDs) in primary care (Aim 1). We will also explore the reasons for any apparent gaps in DUD care by analyzing clinicians' free-text encounter notes using manual chart review, natural language processing (NLP), and/or NLP-assisted manual chart review, as appropriate (Aim 2). Specific Project Aims are as follows: Aim 1 The primary research question we address in Aim 1 is whether routine screening for drug use disorders in primary care (PC) settings increases DUD treatment. We define DUDs as including opioid use disorders (OUD), cannabis use disorders (CUD), and other non-alcohol drug use disorders (OTH). Previously published analyses indicate that the 22 PC clinics in this trial sustained very high rates of screening (88%) and a 3-clinic DUD pilot study suggested that this screening resulted in increased diagnosis of CUD and increased treatment of DUDs in general, even at relatively low observed rates of PC-based screening and assessment. Aim 2 The overall goal of Aim 2 is to expand our understanding of gaps in DUD diagnosis and treatment that persist-despite implementation of high rates of PC screening and assessment for SUDs-using rich information available only in free-text chart notes. Through analysis of relevant chart notes Aim 2 of this project will descriptively characterize gaps in DUD diagnosis and DUD treatment (i.e., instances where information in a patient's record suggests a DUD could be diagnosed but no diagnosis is present, or a new diagnosis suggest treatment is indicated but no evidence of treatment is present), and characterize reasons for DUD care gaps.
The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI) in comparison to Narrative Therapy and Standard Care in reducing readmissions among male patients aged 18 and above with a history of substance use disorder The main questions it aims to answer is: Does the Brief Negotiated Interview reduces rehospitalization rates at least to 50%? Participants will be submitted to a Structured interview with motivational interviewing techniques. Researchers will compare 2 control groups one with standards of care and the other one with a narrative interview to see if they reduce readmission.
This single-arm study will test the preliminary efficacy of a virtually delivered, live-online 12-week group model of Internal Family Systems (IFS) for individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (Program for Alleviating and Reducing Trauma, Stress, and Substance Use, PARTS-SUD). Participants will be in a group for 12 weeks and will be asked to complete survey sessions at baseline and during week 4, 8 and 12.
This cluster randomized trial develops and pilot tests a multi-level substance use stigma intervention that leverages organizational policy and professional education to address structural and professional drivers of stigma in outpatient mental health (MH) services. The investigators will generate preliminary data to determine whether adding an organizational policy to a professional stigma training may reduce measures of provider-based stigma towards substance use and improve care quality and patient outcomes to a greater degree than simply conducting training alone. The investigators hypothesize that providers at a MH site implementing an organizational policy change in addition to providing professional training will demonstrate greater improvement to health services for people who use drugs compared to a site where providers receive training alone.
Alcohol and other drug use is common among people living with HIV in South Africa and is associated with worse engagement in HIV care. There is evidence that healthcare workers in this setting, including community health workers who play a central role in re-engaging patients back into HIV care, exhibit stigmatizing behaviors towards HIV patients who use substances. In general, healthcare worker stigma towards alcohol and other drug use is associated with poorer treatment of patients who use substances, and in this setting, healthcare worker stigma towards alcohol and other drug use has been associated with worse patient engagement in HIV care. In the United States, peer recovery coaches (PRCs), who are trained individuals with lived substance use recovery experience, have helped patients who use substances engage in healthcare. Theoretically, integrating a PRC onto a healthcare team also increases healthcare worker contact with a person with substance use experience, which may be associated with lower stigma. Yet, a PRC model has not yet been tested in South African HIV care. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and pilot a PRC model integrated into community-based primary care teams providing HIV services in South Africa. The study aims to compare a healthcare team with a PRC to a team without a PRC. The investigators will primarily assess the implementation of this PRC model and rates of patient re-engagement in care.
Evaluate the long-term effectiveness of implementing vouchers as a linkage strategy in a population requiring recovery support services (RSS) when no other funding sources are available. A within-subjects study design will be used to test the effectiveness of the Kentucky Access to Recovery (KATR) last resort voucher linkage approach to reduce the risk of nonfatal and fatal overdoses by (a) increasing an individual's recovery capital; (b) reducing resumption of illicit substance use; and (c) promoting relinking to RSSs if illicit substance use is resumed.
This study has been designed to conduct a pilot evaluation of a novel model of support aimed at promoting community integration (CI) following homelessness. This model is called the Peer to Community Model (P2C). The P2C model is an outreach peer support model aimed at facilitating CI for individuals living with concurrent disorders following homelessness. This approach uses relationship-building and engagement in meaningful activity facilitated by peer support specialists (PSS) in concert with occupational therapy (OT) and social work (SW) consultation. This model includes four distinct components: 1) peer support delivered in a community space dedicated to the program or community locations at a maximum ratio of 10:1; 2) OT and SW offering consultation to PSSs and service users; 3) a weekly support meeting for PSSs, OT and SW aimed at providing a venue for problem-solving through complex cases and providing mutual emotional support in the context of service delivery with a complex population; and 4) opportunities for social enterprise (developing ideas for income generation) within the community space. ***NOTE: This is a single model of support that includes the components identified above - these are not separate interventions, but various components of one intervention designed in previous research by the study team. In this clinical trial, the investigators will implement the P2C model for the first time. The study team will conduct a pilot study using an open randomized controlled trial, crossover design. A total of 20 participants will be assigned randomly to the intervention group, where they will receive P2C supports at baseline, and 20 participants will be assigned to a waitlist condition for six months, after which time, they will be offered the P2C intervention. Participants will be interviewed at baseline and every three months using mixed (qualitative and quantitative) interviews. Waitlisted participants will be interviewed during these same intervals using the same interview protocols, and while waiting, will receive care as usual.
This study is the first part of a larger project called "Virtual Reality (VR) as a facilitator for participation in society among persons with mental health/substance use disorders" in which aims to explore,develop and evaluate a VR-based paradigm that facilitates social participation and promotes social recovery of individuals with mental health and/or substance use disorders (MHD/SUD). The overall project comprises three work packages: an exploration study, a development study, and an evaluation study. This study will make up work package 1. The primary aim of this study (WP1) is to explore facilitators and barriers for participation in society among person with MHD/SUD, and to provide an understanding of mechanisms of social participation and social cohesion among persons with MHD/ SUD that may be affected by VR-based interventions. The investigators will derive a socio-emotional learning domain to facilitate key interpersonal and social processes among persons with MHD/SUD in VR-based interventions. To achieve the purpose of this study, the invistigators conduct 10 indepth interviews with service-user with MHD/SUD, 2 focus group interviews with 14 service-providers and an interview-survey with 100 service users. This gives the investigators the possibility to explore facilitators and barriers for social participation as experienced as by individuals with MHD/SUD and identify key interpersonal and social processes suitable to be addressed by tailored VR based interventions.
Background: Loneliness-a subjective emotional state characterized by the perception of social isolation-is a psychosocial factor that is associated with increased mortality, substance use, and is associated with precipitants of relapse among individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). Importantly, there are effective interventions that can be used to decrease loneliness; however, these have not been tested on Veterans with SUD who are lonely. Significance/Impact: Individuals with SUD have higher prevalence of loneliness and loneliness exacerbates pain and sleep disturbance, risk factors of relapse. Without effectively intervening on loneliness, Veterans with SUD will continue to be at high risk of relapse and will maintain problems engaging with social support, including healthcare providers-factors critical for recovery. Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) has shown the strongest effects on loneliness, however, there are no interventions that are specifically designed for substance using populations who are lonely. Testing CBT for loneliness and SUD (CBT-L/SUD) has the potential to have a broad impact on addressing a critical, unmet need that commonly affects Veterans with SUD. The investigators approach of national recruitment and telehealth delivery of this intervention highlights how this this study address VHA care priorities including substance use, access to care, and telehealth. Innovation: There are no studies that have tested a loneliness intervention in Veterans with SUD who are lonely, which may neglect a broader impact on mental and physical health. This study is ideally situated to generate new and important knowledge on the association of loneliness and SUD. This study seeks to address a transdiagnostic factor, which may improve engagement with social support thereby reducing substance use. An additional innovative aspect of this study is recruitment being conducted outside the VHA. This may increase access to care among those Veterans who are especially isolated. Specific Aims: the investigators aim to: (1) refine the CBT-L/SUD manual by conducting a one-arm trial among Veterans with a SUD who report loneliness (n = 6), (2) randomize participants to receive either CBT-L/SUD (n = 15) or CBT-SUD (n = 15) to assess feasibility and acceptability among Veterans with a SUD who report loneliness. Methodology: the investigators will elicit feedback on a draft of the CBT-L/SUD manual then conduct a small single-arm trial (n = 6) for further refinement. Specifically, SUD treatment providers and Veterans with SUD will provide feedback on the draft manual, which the research team will integrate to finalize the manual for a small single-arm trial. This trial will allow us to collect feasibility of treatment delivery, and treatment satisfaction and acceptability data to further refine the manual. With the refined manual Veterans with SUD reporting loneliness will be randomized to either CBT-L/SUD (n = 15) or CBT-SUD (n = 15). The investigators will assess: (1) treatment acceptability, (2) participant adherence to treatment, and (3) therapist fidelity. The investigators will also assess outcome measure completion percentage, means and standard deviations, and level of correlation of repeated measurement of primary loneliness outcomes and secondary substance use outcomes. Implementation/Next Steps: Results from this study will provide critical feasibility and acceptability data to inform an HSR&D Merit Award application to conduct a fully-powered randomized controlled trial. The research team will work with the VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention and the Substance Use Disorder office of the National Mental Health Program to identify implementation and dissemination efforts. For example, the investigators plan to translate findings into applied practice across various settings (e.g., primary care mental health, rehabilitation treatment programs). Additionally, this intervention may be particularly useful for behavioral telehealth centers that deliver evidence-based interventions to rural and other Veterans who have difficulty accessing VHA care.
Harmful alcohol use is a global risk factor for disease, injuries and death. Research on treatment of Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) indicates that different treatment modalities are equally effective, but also that a large group of patients do not change their drinking pattern despite being in treatment. It is assumed that it is not random who benefits from treatment. Thirty to forty percent of outcome variance in treatment is probably explained by patient factors, and we need more knowledge on how different patient factors moderate treatment effects. Further, clinicians also need more knowledge about selecting patients to different therapies. The present study will investigate how patient factors predict outcome in group treatment of AUDs, and what predicts positive treatment outcomes over time. The study is designed as a quasi-experimental, multi-centre, follow-up study. Patients will be included from Vestfold Hospital Trust, Borgestadklinikken, Blue Cross Clinic, Behandlingssenteret Eina, Blue Cross Clinic and A-senteret, Oslo, Church City Mission. The Project will provide more knowledge about patients seeking treatment for AUDs, and specifically how patient factors predict outcome in group treatment. These results will in turn lead to better selection of treatment modalities, and patients will receive a more effective treatment earlier on. Main aims: 1) How do patient factors predict outcome in group treatment of alcohol use disorders (AUDs)? 2) Do positive treatment outcomes last over time? Specifically, do the following factors: a) psychiatric comorbidity b) severity of alcohol use pre-treatment c) personality disorders and d) cognitive impairments predict 1) completion of group treatment and 2) positive outcome after 1 year. As an additional aim, we will investigate if the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCa) is feasible as a brief screening instrument for mild cognitive impairments for AUD patients.