Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01539525
Other study ID # 1005006785
Secondary ID R01DA027194
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received August 3, 2011
Last updated February 9, 2016
Start date September 2010
Est. completion date August 2016

Study information

Verified date February 2016
Source Yale University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Federal Government
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators propose to use obstetric-gynecological clinics to conduct a randomized clinical trial that would compare two SBIRTS (Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral and Treatment), delivered either by a trained nurse or by computer, to usual care (a control condition). As part of this trial, the investigators will include outcomes that allow us to assess the cost effectiveness of these three conditions.


Description:

Aim 1: To assess whether SBIRT, based upon motivational interviewing and delivered either by computer or a trained nurse, leads to decreased use of a subject's primary drug of abuse.

Hypothesis #1a: Referrals based upon motivational principles and delivered by computer, as compared to usual care (health brochure with treatment resources), will lead to greater reductions in a woman's primary substance of abuse.

Hypothesis #1b: Referrals based upon motivational principles and delivered by nurse, as compared to usual care (health brochure with treatment resources), will lead to greater reductions in a woman's primary substance of abuse.

Aim 2: To determine whether SBIRT based upon motivational interviewing and delivered either by computer or by a nurse will promote substance abuse treatment utilization for the primary drug of abuse.

Hypothesis #2a: Treatment utilization (eg. treatment initiation, attendance, use of quit-line or medication) will be higher if a woman receives the computer delivered brief intervention than if she receives usual care only.

Hypothesis #2b: Treatment utilization (eg. treatment initiation, attendance, use of quit-line or medication) will be higher if a woman receives the nurse delivered brief intervention than if she receives usual care only.

Secondary Aim 3: To evaluate whether SBI leads to a decrease in HIV/AIDS risk

Hypothesis #3: Rates of sexually transmitted diseases, injection drug use and risky sexual behavior will be lower at follow up for subjects who receive either computer or a nurse delivered brief intervention than usual care subjects.

Secondary Aim 4: To compare the relative cost-effectiveness of the three interventions.

Hypothesis #4a: Screening and usual care will be the most cost-effective intervention method when the value of an additional unit of effect for the given individual's outcome is relatively low.

Hypotheses #4b: Screening, and a brief intervention delivered by computer, will be the most cost-effective treatment method when the value of an additional unit of effect is relatively high.

Hypotheses #4c: Screening, and a brief intervention delivered by a nurse, will be less cost-effective than a brief intervention delivered by computer.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 495
Est. completion date August 2016
Est. primary completion date August 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

In order to participate, women must meet the following criteria:

1. Are non-pregnant and meet ASSIST criteria for at least moderate risk for alcohol (=11) or drug (=4) abuse or dependence (tobacco or illicit drugs, including cocaine, opiates, methamphetamine, marijuana or a prescription drug used in a medically inappropriate manner).

2. Are pregnant and meet ASSIST criteria for at least mild to moderate risk for alcohol (=6) or drug (=4) abuse or dependence (alcohol, tobacco, an illicit drug, or a prescription drug in a medically inappropriate manner). We define pregnant women who use alcohol or drugs at least monthly in the last 90 days as eligible because alcohol and many of the other substances (eg. tobacco) are teratogens and use in pregnancy would be consistent with a diagnosis of abuse ("recurrent use in situations in which it is physically hazardous"). This level of use in pregnancy also indicates a greater likelihood of problematic substance use.

3. Have used their primary substance at least once within the prior 28 days.

4. Are aged 18 or more. We include participants who are aged 18 or older because parents may not be available at screening to provide consent for non-pregnant participants and subjects may not wish to disclose drug or alcohol abuse to a parent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Women are ineligible if they have any of the following criteria:

1. Are unable to speak English.

2. Are incarcerated or at risk of incarceration. The YNHH Women's Center provides care to incarcerated women. These individuals as well as those at risk of incarceration are excluded because incarceration precludes their ability to seek specialty drug or alcohol abuse treatment (a dependent measure).

3. Have a cognitive disorder that would impair their ability to provide informed consent or provide accurate information.

4. Require immediate hospitalization because of general medical needs or due to active suicidal or homicidal ideation or other behavioral health problems. We exclude individuals who are in need of immediate hospitalization because hospitalization will render it more difficult for them to immediately follow-up on a referral and because providers, rather than subjects, may be making the decision to initiate treatment. Hospitalization would also potentially force women who smoke to initiate treatment for tobacco addiction.

5. Are currently participating or have participated in drug abuse treatment, including self-help interventions (eg. 12 step facilitation, smoking cessation interventions), within the last 3 months prior to screening.

6. Are planning to relocate out of the area in the following 6 months. Women who relocate out of the area would be difficult to see for follow up assessments and it would be difficult to confirm treatment attendance in local treatment centers.

7. Have previously participated in this protocol or

8. Are unwilling to participate or accept randomization.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Behavioral:
Motivational Interview
Motivational Interview provided by either a Nurse or Computer
Other:
Resource brochure
Subjects given a brochure listing relevant recovery resources in the local area.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Yale-New Haven Hospital- York St Campus New Haven Connecticut
United States Yale-New Haven Hospital-Chapel St Campus New Haven Connecticut

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Yale University National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Substance use Decrease in subject's primary drug of abuse 6 months No
Primary Treatment utilization Increase in subjects' treatment utilization 6 months No
Secondary Rates of STDs Decreased rates of sexually transmitted diseases 6 months No
Secondary Improved cost-effectiveness Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) will be calculated separately for the societal perspective and the payer's perspective. ICERs measure the incremental cost of using a given intervention, compared to the next-least-costly intervention, to produce an extra unit of effect for each of the patient outcomes (e.g., an additional patient initiating treatment, an additional week of abstinence). 6 months No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT02432066 - Effects of GTS-21 on Smoking Behavior and Neurocognitive Functions Phase 2
Completed NCT03960138 - Examining the Effects of Neural Stimulation on Inhibitory Control and Cigarette Smoking N/A
Recruiting NCT05030272 - Comparing Two Behavioral Approaches to Quitting Smoking in Mental Health Settings N/A
Completed NCT04646668 - Comparative Abuse Liability Among African American and White Smokers N/A
Completed NCT02560324 - Effect of Ramelteon on Smoking Abstinence Phase 2
Completed NCT02347605 - Medicinal Nicotine for Preventing Cue Induced Craving N/A
Completed NCT01428310 - Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dietary Supplement Anatabloc in Reducing Daily Smokers' Urge to Smoke Phase 1
Completed NCT01570595 - Positively Smoke Free on the Web (PSFW) for Smokers Living With HIV Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01625767 - Tobacco Approach Avoidance Training for Adolescent Smokers-1 Phase 2
Terminated NCT01800500 - Interest in Smokeless Tobacco Product as a Substitution for Cigarettes in Current Smokers N/A
Completed NCT01442753 - Family-Skills Training to Prevent Tobacco and Other Substance Use in Latino Youth N/A
Completed NCT00967005 - N-Acetyl Cysteine Plus Behavioral Therapy for Nicotine Dependent Pathological Gamblers Phase 2
Completed NCT01337817 - A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ariva® Silver Wintergreen in Healthy Smokers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT00751660 - Screening Methods in Finding Lung Cancer Early in Current or Former Smokers N/A
Completed NCT00790569 - Varenicline or Nicotine Patch and Nicotine Gum in Helping Smokers in a Methadone Treatment Program Stop Smoking N/A
Completed NCT00664261 - Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke (CEASE) Program or Standard Care in Helping Parents Stop Smoking N/A
Completed NCT00158145 - Assessing the Variability Over Time of Tobacco Carcinogen Biomarkers in Smokers - 2 Phase 2
Completed NCT00158158 - Effectiveness of Reducing Smoking in Facilitating Smoking Cessation in Adolescents - 2 Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00218179 - Assessing the Link Between Smoke Carcinogen Biomarkers and Lung Cancer Risk - 1 N/A
Completed NCT01213524 - Nicotine and Sensorimotor Replacement for Smoking in Smokers With Schizophrenia Phase 2

External Links