Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04306120 |
Other study ID # |
KMUHIRB-F(II)-20200009 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 9, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
October 24, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This 3-year study will recruit a total of 72 subjects with first-ever stroke after 3 months
onset from the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in 3 teaching hospitals.
This study design employs a prospective single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with
pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. Participants who meet and be willing to join
this study will be assigned into one of three groups (noxious cold only, noxious heat only,
or alternative TS). All subjects will receive conventional rehabilitation. In addition, three
groups will receive an additional TS protocol with a total of 15 sessions for 3 weeks (5
times per week, 30 minutes daily). Primary outcome measures include the LE subscale of
Fugl-Meyer assessment, the modified Ashworth scale, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke
Patients, Timed Up and Go test, and the Barthel index. Moreover, spinal circuit excitability
will be assessed by measuring Hoffmann reflex/ M wave ratio, H-reflex recruitment curves, and
reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle. Muscle properties will be evaluated by measuring
the soleus muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness. All participants will be assessed with the
outcome measures at beginning of the intervention, the end of the intervention, 1 month and 3
months after the intervention.
Description:
Effective evaluation and treatment for lower extremity (LE) motor and function recovery in
patients with stroke have been one of the primary goals for rehabilitation therapy. The
purposes of this study are to compare immediate and long-term treatment effects among noxious
cold only, noxious heat only, and alternative thermal stimulation (TS) on the LE motor
recovery and neuromuscular properties and to investigate the relationships among spinal
circuit excitability, muscle properties, and motor function of LE in patients with chronic
stroke.
This 3-year study will recruit a total of 72 subjects with first-ever stroke after 3 months
onset from the department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in 3 teaching hospitals.
This study design employs a prospective single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with
pretest, posttest, and follow-up assessments. Participants who meet and be willing to join
this study will be assigned into one of three groups (noxious cold only, noxious heat only,
or alternative TS). All subjects will receive conventional rehabilitation. In addition, three
groups will receive an additional TS protocol with a total of 15 sessions for 3 weeks (5
times per week, 30 minutes daily). Primary outcome measures include the LE subscale of
Fugl-Meyer assessment, the modified Ashworth scale, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke
Patients, Timed Up and Go test, and the Barthel index. Moreover, spinal circuit excitability
will be assessed by measuring Hoffmann reflex/ M wave ratio, H-reflex recruitment curves, and
reciprocal inhibition of the soleus muscle. Muscle properties will be evaluated by measuring
the soleus muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness. All participants will be assessed with the
outcome measures at one week before the intervention, beginning of the intervention, the end
of the intervention, 1 month and 3 months after the intervention. A two-way repeated measures
analysis of variance will be used to investigate the effects among the three groups across
time points tested with adequate post-hoc comparisons.
The results of this study will help to understand the immediate and long-term effects of
motor recovery of different TS modes and the adaptive change of neuromuscular properties as
well to select the more effective TS treatment mode on facilitating LE motor and function
recovery in patients with stroke.