Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT02672761 |
Other study ID # |
MBSR-Diako-MA-2015 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 2016 |
Est. completion date |
June 1, 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2022 |
Source |
Heidelberg University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Meditation improves attention and memory by reducing of the increased electric brain activity
induced by a high stress level. This is associated to neuroplastic changes (volume reduction
and/or neuron's density increases) in various brain structures. The question evolves if
memory improvement by a standardized meditation program of 8 weeks (Mindfulness Based Stress
Reduction MBSR) or a specific memory training (My Brain Training MBT) is a specific effect on
brain networking or mediated by a reduced general activity induced by stress reduction. Thus,
meditation or memory training should have differing neuroplastic effects.
The effects of memory function improvement by the respective training will be measured by
MAT, a specific and validated computerized memory and attention test. Brain morphology is
investigated by voxel based morphometry NMR before and immediately after an 8 weeks
intervention period. Stress levels are measured by cortisol profiles of subjects. Compared
were 4 groups- "MBSR" group- MBSR students after completed training, passive "control" group-
subjects following an 8 weeks waiting period for the MBSR training without any memory
training, active control "MBT" group- subjects on an 8 weeks waiting period for the MBSR
training doing an 8 weeks MBT memory training instead, "Wellness" group - doing a structured
program using relaxing massage and calming computerized chair ("Brain Light").
The hypothesis of the study is that MBSR improves memory function better than MBT when
measured by MAT. Compared to both active and passive controls, MBSR training induces specific
morphologic changes in the brain, indicated by a volume change of the voxel based morphometry
method of 5% of a defined brain region. In comparison to smaller and less neuroplasticity
induced by MBT on memory brain regions, MBSR induces greater volume changes on hippocampus
and amygdala and stress reduction than the wellness program.
Description:
The question evolves if memory improvement by a standardized meditation program of 8 weeks
(Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction MBSR) or a specific memory training (My Brain Training
MBT) is a specific effect on brain networking or mediated by a reduced general activity
induced by stress reduction. The capacity of MBSR to induce dramatic neuroplastic changes
such as morphological grey matter changes in the brain, reduced amygdala function and volume
as well as electric activity level of the somatosensory cortex should allow for a
discrimination and allocation of various memorial subfunctions such as visual/figural and
episodic as well as acoustic memory. Although networking effects surely are involved in all
memory subfunctions, the main brain target regions for verbal/episodic memory is the
hippocampus (memory malfunctions are associated with hippocampal volume reduction and/or
neuron losses) whereas those for other subfunctions are not known.
Therefore, morphological MBSR effects of the brain were compared to specific memory training
via MBT. In this study, MBSR and MBT memory training are working as competitive effects on
memory subfunctions, whereas a wellness massage and relaxing program and a
do-not-change-anything group will serve as active and passive controls. The effects of memory
function improvement by the respective training will be measured by MAT (Memory and Attention
Test), a specific and validated computerized memory and attention test. Brain morphology was
investigated by voxel based morphometry NMR before and immediately after an 8 weeks
intervention period. Targets for morphometry are hippocampus CA1 region for verbal and
episodic memory, the visual or acoustic cortex and the combined hippocampus areas for visual
and acoustic memories, the amygdala volume for stress level and the frontotemporal lobe as a
combined target of MBSR and memory assessment. Stress levels are measured by cortisol
profiles of subjects. Compared were 4 groups- "MBSR" group- MBSR students after completed
training, passive "control" group- subjects following an 8 weeks waiting period for the MBSR
training without any memory training or wellness program, active control "MBT" group-
subjects on an 8 week waiting period for the MBSR training doing an 8 week MBT memory
training instead, "Wellness" group - doing a structured program using relaxing massage and
calming computerized chair ("Brain Light").
The hypothesis of the study is that MBSR improves memory function better than MBT when
measured by MAT. Compared to both active and passive controls, MBSR training induces specific
morphologic changes in the brain, indicated by a volume change of the voxel based morphometry
method of 5% of a defined brain region. In comparison to smaller and less neuroplasticity
induced by MBT on memory brain regions, MBSR induces greater volume changes on hippocampus
and amygdala and stress reduction than the wellness progam.