Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Relative power alpha |
Electroencephalography (EEG) is an indicator of relaxation. EEG, a measure of electrical brain activity in various regions of the brain (Luck, 2014), can be used to demonstrate changes in CNS activity attributable to relaxation (Jacobs & Friedman, 2004). During performance of the salaat, HRV may be measured in frequency bands of low frequency (LF) ranging from about 0.04 - 0.15 Hz and high frequency (HF) ranging from about 0.15-0.40 Hz. |
Relative power alpha will be assessed beginning five minutes prior to the first condition (salaat/sham condition) and will continue through the study until five minutes after the second condition, for a total duration of around 30-45 minutes. |
|
Primary |
High frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) |
Using a heart-rate variability monitor, low sympathetic nervous system activity and higher peripheral nervous system (PNS) activity is measured as high frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV).
Using a heart-rate variability monitor, low sympathetic nervous system activity and higher PNS activity is measured as high frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV). |
HF-HRV will be assessed beginning five minutes prior to the first condition (salaat/sham condition) and will continue through the study until five minutes after the second condition, for a total duration of around 30-45 minutes. |
|
Primary |
The Body Perception Questionnaire Body Awareness Very Short Form (BPQ-VSF) |
The Body Perception Questionnaire Body Awareness Very Short Form BPQ-VSF is a 12-item self-report measure adapted from the shortened version of the 26-item BPQ-SF to assess Autonomic nervous system function using a single factor of body awareness (Kolacz et al., 2018). Categorical omega was calculated for internal consistency yielding .91 for the full scale (Cabrera et al., 2018). Test-retest reliability was .97 (Cabrera et al., 2018). Scores range from 12 - 60 with higher scores indicating greater ANS functioning. |
IPAQ-SF will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
The SF 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) |
The 36-Item Health Survey short form (SF-36) is a 36-item self-report measure assessing health-related quality of life in eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental health, bodily pain, social functioning, general health perceptions, and energy/fatigue. The scale also yields two component scores: a mental component summary score (MCS) and a physical component summary (PCS) score (Hays, Sherbourne, & Mazel, 1993). The MCS and PCS scores will be utilized in this study to reflect generic quality of life in the emotional (MCS) and physical (PCS) domains. Possible scores of the components range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable health state. Cronbach's alpha for the current study was 0.87 for both the PCS and MCS domains. |
The SF-36 will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Modified International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) |
The Modified International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF; Craig et al., 2003) is an 8-item self-report measure that assesses physical activity and inactivity during the previous seven days. The IPAQ-SF demonstrates acceptable criterion validity (pooled ? = .30), and respondents report the number of days, hours per day, and minutes per day in the last seven days that they engaged in vigorous exercise, moderate exercise, walking, and sitting. Five factors are scored including total physical activity, walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity, and sitting (Lee, Macfarlane, Lam, & Stewart, 2011). |
IPAQ-SF will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Health Care Discrimination Scale (HCDS; Martin, 2015) |
The Health Care Discrimination Scale (HCDS) is a 15-item scale comprised of two subscales: the health care cultural safety subscale (HCCS), and the healthcare provider addressed Muslim-specific care needs of patient and family subscale (HCPF) (Martin, 2015). Possible scores for the total measure range from 0 - 48. The range of scores for the HCCS and HCPF subscales are both 0 - 24. Cronbach's alpha for the overall HCDS was a = .78 while the HCCS and HCPF subscales demonstrated reliability estimates of a = .87 and a = .66 respectively (Martin, 2015). |
The HCDS will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Perceived Religious Discrimination Scale (PRDS; Rippy & Newman, 2008) |
The Perceived Religious Discrimination Scale (PRDS) is a 36-item self-report measure of perceived discrimination based on religious identity. Participants respond to items on a 5-point Likert scale from zero (never) to four (very frequently). All items can be summed for a total score. Additionally, there are three subscales that can be calculated: Racial Prejudice and Stigmatization (RPS), Bicultural Identification (BI), and Racist Environment (RE). The PRDS exhibits high internal reliability for the total score (Cronbach's a = .92) and for the three subscales: RPS (a = .91), BI (a = .84), and RE (a = .87) (Rippy & Newman, 2008). Possible scores for the total measure range from 0 - 132. The range of scores for the RPS, BI, and RE subscales are 0 - 88, 0 - 20, and 0 - 24, respectively. |
The PRDS will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
The Internalized Islamophobia Scale |
The Internalized Islamophobia Scale (IIS) was adapted from the Appropriated Racial Oppression Scale for use with Muslim individuals (AROS; Campon R. R., & Carter, R.T. 2015). After removal of the American Standards of Beauty subscale, the original 24-item scale was reduced to 15 items consisting of 3 of the 4 original factors: emotional responses (ER), devaluation of one's own group (DG), and patterns of thinking (PT) (Campon R. R., & Carter, R.T. 2015). Cronbach's alpha internal reliability for the AROS was a=.83 for ER subscale, a=.86 for DG subscale, and a=.70 for the PT subscale (Campon R. R., & Carter, R.T. 2015). Possible scores for the total measure range from 15 - 105. The range of scores for the ER, DG, and PT subscales are 6 - 42, 6 - 42, and 3 - 21, respectively. |
The IIS will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Muslim Identification Scale (MIS; Verkuyten, 2007) |
The Muslim Identification Scale (MIS) is a 6-item self-report measure of the degree to which individuals who categorize themselves as Muslim identify with their own faith, rated on a 5-point likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). This 6-item scale measures several aspects of religious identification such as importance of faith, religiosity, identification with other Muslims, and mosque or masjid attendance. A single index is calculated for each respondent by adding his or her responses to the six items. The Muslim Identity Scale has demonstrated strong internal consistency with a reported Cronbach's a of .95 (Verkuyten, 2007). Possible scores for the total scale range from 6 - 30. |
The MIS will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Brief Religious COPE |
The Brief Religious Cope (Brief RCOPE) is a 14-item measure assessing religious coping in the face of major life stressors. The Brief RCOPE has two subscales: positive religious coping (PRC) and negative religious coping (NRC). While positive religious coping reflects a constructive relationship with a transcendental force, connectedness with others, and a compassionate worldview, negative religious coping reflects spiritual struggles with oneself, others, and with the divine. The NRC subscale has emerged as a robust predictor of health-related outcomes (Pargament, Feuille, & Burdzy, 2011). |
The Brief RCOPE will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Salaat Frequency Scale |
The Salaat Frequency Scale (SFS) is a single item measure of the frequency of salaat performance. Possible scores for the total scale range from 0 to 4. The Salaat Quality Scale is a measure of mindful engagement in salaat according to Islamic goals of obtaining khushu (sincerity and humility), through Ihsan (awareness of God), and taqwa (God consciousness). Possible scores for the scale range from 0 to 32. |
The SFS will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
The Salaat Index |
The Salaat Index was adapted from Toylamat and Moradi's Hijab Index (2011) and is a calculation of salaat performance that includes both a qualitative and quantitative component. The Salaat Index is calculated by multiplying Salaat Frequency Scale and Salaat Quality Scale to obtain both qualitative and quantitative measures of the prayer. Possible scores for the total scale range from 0 to 128. |
The Salaat index will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|
Secondary |
Hijab Frequency Scale |
The Hijab Frequency Scale is a measure of how often participants wear the hijab. Possible scores for the total scale range from 0 to 4. The Hijab Conservativeness Scale ranges from 1 to 8 and measures the extent to which participants wear the traditional Islamic hijab. The Hijab Index is a calculation of hijab use that includes both a qualitative and quantitative component. The Hijab Index is calculated by multiplying hijab conservativeness and hijab frequency to obtain both a qualitative and quantitative measure of hijab (Toylamat & Moradi, 2011). Possible scores for the total scale range from 0 to 32. |
The Hijab Frequency scale will be measured only during the baseline, a single time-point prior to the intervention. |
|