View clinical trials related to Stone;Renal.
Filter by:To investigate the effectiveness of percutaneous nephrostomy catheter placement versus retrograde double J catheter placement in patients with symptoms of obstructive kidney disease (with either infection and/or pain and/or kidney function deterioration) caused by urolithiasis.
The EUA Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel meta-analysis suggest that mPNL is at least as efficacious and safe as sPNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only one of which was RCT. The risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs. So, the Panel recommended for more clinical research . The aim of this study is to compare between PNL and mPNL through a randomized controlled trial.
Management of nephrolithiasis is evolving rapidly, and various minimally-invasive urological procedures are currently available for treating patients with renal stones, including extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL). Despite being the only truly-non-invasive, outpatient procedure, stone-free rates (SFRs) of ESWL are lower than both mini-PCNL and f-URS. Furthermore, ESWL has several limitations, such as pregnancy; uncorrected coagulopathy;aortic aneurism; severe obesity; large stone burdens (>2cm); stones with high densities (>970/1000 Hounsfield units); ESWL-resistant stone compositions; lower calyceal stones with unfavourable anatomical criteria; and stones in calyceal diverticula; Morbidities of the conventional PCNL are significantly minimised by using less access diameters in PCNL while providing comparable SFRs. Additionally, Mini and Micro PCNL result in shorter hospital stay and higher tubeless rates compared to conventional PCNL. Flexible ureteroscopy has been increasingly used as a primary modality for treatment of renal stones with significantly lower complication rates than PCNL and mini-PCNL in terms of less bleeding and transfusion rates, shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain. Additionally, f-URS is the only treatment modality of nephrolithiasis that can be safely and effectively used in patients with bleeding tendency, as well as pregnant women; moreover, its outcomes are not affected by obesity. Nevertheless, its poor durability and high costs remain major limitations for f-URS, especially in developing countries.
Background: The exit strategy after ureteroscopy for stone treatment remains a topic for discussion. Current EAU guidelines on urolithiasis state that postoperative stenting is indicated in patients at increased risk of postoperative complications. Stenting is not considered necessary in all other cases, and after uncomplicated procedures. Objective: To analyse the postoperative ureteral stenting strategy in clinical practice looking at the indication, type of stents used and the duration of stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. Furthermore, the investigators will examine in what setting the stents are being removed postoperatively. Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, international, multicentre registry study executed by uCARE. Study population: All patients >18 years with a ureter or renal stone who are planned for ureteroscopic treatment by semi-rigid and/or flexible ureteroscopy are eligible for this study.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to acceptable stone fragmentation during clinical use of the holmium laser when using energy settings 0.2J vs 0.8J. The hypothesis is that holmium laser energy settings 0.8J will require less time than lower energy settings 0.2J for fragmenting urinary stones. The clinical practice is to treat urinary stones until the stone is reduced to fragments ≤ 2 mm in size. This is determined by using the laser fiber which is 273 microns to visually estimate the size of the resultant fragments as described by Patel et al, J Endo 2014. Investigators will standardize the effect of stone size by creating a ratio of stone size to treatment time. In this study, the frequency is set at 15Hz. Thus, the study contains two arms: 0.2J&15Hz, and 0.8J&15Hz. Patients will be randomized into the two groups by the ratio of 1:1.