Status Epilepticus Clinical Trial
Official title:
Feasibility Study: tDCS for Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus
Status epilepticus, or recurrent seizures without return to baseline, is a neurologic emergency. Refractory status epilepticus occurs when seizures are resistant to multiple first line anti-seizure medications. The ability to quickly stop seizures is paramount. Transcranial direct current simulation is a non-invasive, easily administered therapy that can potentially help reduce seizure burden. The goal of this feasibility study is to assess the ability of the study site to enroll patients admitted with refractory seizures or those with abnormal brain wave patterns to take part in a study looking to use transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunctive treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the recruitment capability of the study site? - How well can the study site adhere to study protocol? - Are there any adverse effects of using the transcranial direct current stimulation device? - How do patients' brain wave studies respond to the stimulation? Participants will be asked to consider joining the study. Once joined, researchers will randomly assign participants to compare transcranial stimulation versus sham stimulation to see if this will affect the participant's brain wave patterns.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | July 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patient with refractory status epilepticus (RSE), or supra-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), or electroencephalographic (EEG) characteristics > 50% of the time on the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) or epilepsia partialis continua for at least 12 hours. - A patient with RSE is defined as having seizure(s) refractory to first line benzodiazepines and second-line antiseizure medications (ASMs; phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproate). - A patient with SRSE is defined as: - requiring at least 24 hours of a third-line intravenous anesthetic therapy (IVAT) such as propofol, midazolam, or ketamine, and - failing at least one previous wean of an IVAT. - A patient with epilepsia partialis continua (EPC) is defined as: - having focal seizure(s) refractory to first line benzodiazepines and second-line ASMs and - repeated episodes lasting more than one hour - A patient on the IIC is defined as: - having periodic discharges or rhythmic patterns at a rate at more than 1Hz and less than 3Hz and - IIC patterns for more than 50% of the time (IIC burden = 50%) within any prior 12 hour interval. - access to continuous EEG monitoring - brain imaging (Computerized Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging) within 1 year of presentation Exclusion Criteria: - Damaged skin on scalp as determined by the primary team that prevents reasonably accurate electroencephalography monitoring and which may interfere with tDCS stimulation. - Cranial metal implants (>1 mm thick epicranial titanium skull plates and metal dental fillings) or medical devices (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulator, medication infusion pump, cochlear implant). - Previous surgeries opening the skull leaving skull defects capable of allowing the insertion of a cylinder with a radius greater or equal to 5 mm. - Presence of any disease, medical condition or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigators, may adversely impact the safety of the subject or the integrity of the data - Those who are pregnant |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Yale New Haven Hospital | New Haven | Connecticut |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Yale University |
United States,
Fisher RS, McGinn RJ, Von Stein EL, Wu TQ, Qing KY, Fogarty A, Razavi B, Venkatasubramanian C. Transcranial direct current stimulation for focal status epilepticus or lateralized periodic discharges in four patients in a critical care setting. Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):875-887. doi: 10.1111/epi.17514. Epub 2023 Feb 7. — View Citation
Matsumoto H, Ugawa Y. Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016 Dec 21;2:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017. — View Citation
Ng MC, El-Alawi H, Toutant D, Choi EH, Wright N, Khanam M, Paunovic B, Ko JH. A Pilot Study of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Refractory Status Epilepticus: The SURESTEP Trial. Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jan;20(1):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01317-5. Epub 2022 Nov 2. — View Citation
Trinka E, Rainer LJ, Granbichler CA, Zimmermann G, Leitinger M. Mortality, and life expectancy in Epilepsy and Status epilepticus-current trends and future aspects. Front Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 23;3:1081757. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1081757. eCollection 2023. — View Citation
Yang D, Wang Q, Xu C, Fang F, Fan J, Li L, Du Q, Zhang R, Wang Y, Lin Y, Huang Z, Wang H, Chen C, Xu Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhao X, Zhao X, Li T, Liu C, Niu Y, Zhou Q, Zhou Q, Duan Y, Liu X, Yu T, Xue Q, Li J, Dai X, Han J, Ren C, Xu H, Li N, Zhang J, Xu N, Yang K, Wang Y. Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm parallel multicenter study. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 24. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Recruitment capability of the study site- Incidence | Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the incidence of patients admitted with RSE/SRSE or IIC burden > 50% within a 24 month period. Participants admitted undergoing cEEG monitoring will be screened for having RSE or IIC burden >50% on a weekly basis. | up to 24 months | |
Primary | Recruitment capability of the study site- Prevalence | Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the prevalence of patients admitted with RSE/SRSE or IIC burden > 50% within a 24 month period. Participants admitted undergoing cEEG monitoring will be screened for having RSE or IIC burden >50% on a weekly basis.
Prevalence will be calculated against weekly average patient census. |
up to 24 months | |
Primary | Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Eligible | Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of eligible study participants compared to all patients admitted with RSE or IIC burden >50% within a 24-month period. | up to 24 months | |
Primary | Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Consent | Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of eligible participants who consent for study | up to 24 months | |
Primary | Recruitment capability of the study site- Percent Withdraw | Recruitment capability of the study site will be assessed as the percent of consented participants who withdraw consent. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Ability to implement protocol at study site | Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of patients able to complete the stimulation protocol and drop out causes. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Ability to implement protocol at study site- Protocol Deviations | Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of protocol deviations including un-blinding, contamination, truncation or extension of stimulation protocol, and qualitative causes of protocol deviations. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Ability to implement protocol at study site- Participants Lost to Follow Up | Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of participants lost to follow up. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Ability to implement protocol at study site- Device Failures | Ability to implement protocol at the study site will be assessed as the percent of device failure compared to total number of stimulation sessions. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Safety profile of tDCS by number of adverse events. | Safety profile of tDCS will be assessed as the number of adverse events. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Safety profile of tDCS by number of serious adverse events. | Safety profile of tDCS will be assessed as the number of serious adverse events. | up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Time to resolution of status epilepticus | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed as time to resolution of status epilepticus in patients admitted with RSE and SRSE (hours) in either study arm. Time to resolution of status epilepticus is defined as the time from first stimulation session until cessation of electrographic status epilepticus for more than 8 hours. | Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Seizure Burden | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using EEG assessments to determine seizure burden before, during, and after intervention. Assesments will be conducted by study personnel on a post-hoc basis and quantified using both automatic spike detection software (Persyst) and manual methods. | Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in IIC burden | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using EEG assessments to determine IIC burden before, during, and after intervention. Assessments will be conducted by study personnel on a post-hoc basis and quantified using both automatic spike detection software (Persyst) and manual methods. | Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in ASM burden | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed by the ASM burden at baseline, 12 hours, 7 days, and 30 days after intervention. Anti-seizure medication burden is defined as the sum total of all antiseizure medication ratios. Antiseizure medication ratios are defined as the prescribed total daily dose given over the maximal allowed daily dose of each given antiseizure medication as defined by the World Health Organization as the typical daily dose for a given ASM. ASM burden = S (ASM total daily dose/ASM total daily max dose). | Baseline, 12 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using the APACHE II Score. Each variable is weighted from 0 to 4, with the range of the total score from 0 to 71. Higher scores correspond to more severe disease and a higher risk of death. | Baseline and 7 days | |
Secondary | Preliminary evaluation of effect of tDCS- Change in modified Rankin Score | Preliminary evaluation of the effect of tDCS on participants with RSE/SRSE or high IIC burden will be assessed using the modified Rankin Score. It is a 6 point disability scale with possible scores ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5.(disability requiring constant care for all needs); 6 is death. | Baseline and 30 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03883516 -
Improving Emergency Management of Status Epilepticus
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03378687 -
A Clinical Study of Children With Status Epilepticus in China
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00362141 -
Safety and Tolerability Study of Levetiracetam to Treat Patients With Status Epilepticus
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05140265 -
De-identified UNMH EEG Corpus Database Creation With Fully De-identified Clinical Information
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04391569 -
Randomized Therapy In Status Epilepticus
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06017973 -
The Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis, Management and Prognosis of Possible Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06334796 -
Artificial Intelligence-powered Virtual Assistant for Emergency Triage in Neurology
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05491590 -
Patient-reported Outcome After Status Epilepticus
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04421846 -
Study of Pathophysiology of Status Epilepticus and Dysimmune Encephalitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02958605 -
Smartphone Apps for Pediatric Resuscitation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02239380 -
Lorazepam for the Treatment of Status Epilepticus or Repetitive Status Epilepticus in Japan
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01796574 -
Ketogenic Diet for Refractory Status Epilepticus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02381977 -
Prevalence of Acute Critical Neurological Disease in Children: a Global Epidemiological Assessment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00004297 -
Phase III Randomized Study of Diazepam Vs Lorazepam Vs Placebo for Prehospital Treatment of Status Epilepticus
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03905798 -
LORA-PITA IV General Investigation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05591508 -
Ketogenic Diet for Status Epilepticus in Children Post Cessation of Convulsive Status Epilepticus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00735527 -
Nasal Versus Venous Lorazepam for Control of Acute Seizures in Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00265616 -
Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06401707 -
PeRampanel fOr Status ePilEpticus pRophylaxis Post-cardiac Arrest
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06403150 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Levetiracetam Versus Fosphenytoin in Convulsive Status Epilepticus
|
Phase 4 |