Staphylococcal Infection Clinical Trial
Official title:
Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal and Topical Mupirocin in Eradicating Colonization With Staphylococcus Aureus (SA) in Critically Ill Infants - a Phase 2, Multi-Center, Open Label, Randomized Trial
Verified date | April 13, 2016 |
Source | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this trial is 1) to evaluate the safety and clinical acceptability of a 5-day course of mupirocin applied every 8 hours (± 2 hours) to the nares, umbilical and perianal areas of infants residing in the ICU. 2) to examine the efficacy of mupirocin in eradicating SA colonization of infants in the ICU, defined as the absence of SA in cultures of the nares, umbilical, and perianal areas on day 8 (± 2) (primary decolonization) 3) to examine the efficacy of mupirocin in achieving persistent eradication of SA colonization among infants residing in the ICU,defined as the absence of SA in cultures of the nares, umbilical, and perianal areas. Duration is 36 months. Enrolled infants will continue to receive medical care as they otherwise would if they were not enrolled in the trial. The study will be powered with a primary endpoint with 126 participants. Enrollment may continue to 500 participants to power secondary and exploratory endpoints and assist design subsequent studies.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 155 |
Est. completion date | June 21, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | June 7, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A to 24 Months |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Currently admitted to a NICU or ICU at a participating site 2. Chronological age less than 24 months 3. Evidence of colonization with SA (MRSA or MSSA) based on a positive nasal surveillance culture. Randomization must occur within 7 days (168 hours) of when the site's laboratory reports the first SA positive nasal surveillance swab 4. The attending neonatologist/ intensivist anticipates that the infant will remain in the ICU for a minimum of 14 days after enrollment 5. Parent or legal guardian agrees that the infant will not participate in a research trial involving the administration of an investigational drug for 14 days following enrollment Exclusion Criteria: 1. Receipt of an investigational drug as part of a research trial within the past 14 days 2. Previously enrolled and participated in this trial 3. Has an active or previous SA infection 4. Currently receiving topical or intranasal mupirocin 5. Has a rash in an area to which mupirocin will be directly applied 6. Has any of the following congenital abnormalities: --A congenital skin disorder (i.e. - epidermolysis bullosa, icthyosis) --An opened neural tube defect --Confirmed or suspected choanal atresia --Any of the following abdominal wall defects: wound dehiscence, gastroschisis, open abdominal wound (small abdominal wall defects such as ostomy sites or peritoneal drain sites are not exclusionary) 7. Is nasally intubated 8. Known hypersensitivity to the trial product or its constituents 9. Known or suspected immune deficiency. Infants born to HIV-seropositive mothers with the following risk factors for intrapartum transmission will not be eligible to participate: --Mother's most recent viral load within the past 3 months was > 1,000 copies/ml or --Mother's viral load is not known or has has not been measured in the past 3 months. 10. Any other condition(s) that in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardize the safety or rights of a participant or would render the participant unable to comply with the protocol |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Emory University Hospital Midtown - Neonatal Intensive Care Unit | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | University of Maryland Medical Center - Children's Hospital - Neonatal Intensive Care Unit | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center - Infectious Diseases | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases | Kansas City | Missouri |
United States | Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Saint Louis University School of Medicine - Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center - NICU | Saint Louis | Missouri |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Solicited Adverse Events (AEs) During Days 1-7 | Participants were evaluated for solicited adverse events while in the NICU/ICU on days 1-7. Participants were counted if they experienced the symptom at any severity during the reporting period. Although participants received only 5 days of mupirocin, solicited events were collected through day 7. | Days 1 through 7 | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Moderate and Severe Unsolicited Adverse Events; During Days 1-7 | Participants were evaluated for moderate and severe unsolicited adverse events (that were not otherwise considered pre-defined trial endpoints) while in the NICU/ICU on days 1-7. Although participants received 5 days of mupirocin, unsolicited events were collected until day 7. Moderate events were defined as those that may cause some interference with functioning and daily activities. Severe events were defined as those that interrupt the participant's usual daily activities and may require systemic drug therapy or other treatment. Severe events were usually incapacitating. | Days 1 through 7 | |
Primary | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During Days 1-7 | Participants were evaluated for Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) while in the NICU/ICU on days 1-7. Although participants received only 5 days of mupirocin, SAEs were collected through day 7. An adverse event or suspected adverse reaction was considered serious if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; a life-threatening adverse event (an event that places the participant at immediate risk of death; it doesn't include an adverse event, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; or any other event that when based upon appropriate medical judgement may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. | Days 1 through 7 | |
Primary | Primary Decolonization Efficacy- Number of Participants in the Treatment and Control Groups Who Have no Detectable S. Aureus (SA) on Direct Nasal, Umbilical, and Perianal (NUP) Cultures Obtained on Day 8. | Colonization was defined as the presence of SA identified by NUP culture without signs of illness or infection. On day 8, participants were swabbed in each of three areas: nasal, umbilical, and perianal. These swabs were cultured by direct plating. If SA did not grow on any of these cultures the infant was considered to be decolonized. If SA grew on any one of these cultures the infant was considered to be colonized with SA. | Day 8 | |
Primary | Persistent Decolonization Efficacy- Number of Participants in the Treatment and Control Groups Who Have no Detectable S. Aureus (SA) on Direct Nasal, Umbilical, and Perianal (NUP) Cultures on Days 8 and 22. | Participants were admitted into the study based on being colonized with SA. Participants who were decolonized both on day 8 and day 22, as determined by NUP cultures were considered to have persistent decolonization. Colonization was defined as the presence of SA identified by NUP culture without signs of illness or infection. NUP swabs were collected on day 8 and on day 22 and cultured by direct plating. If the cultures were negative for SA at both day 8 and day 22 the participant was considered to have persistent decolonization. Colonization with SA was a prerequisite for enrollment, because of this there was no baseline measure. | Day 8 and Day 22 | |
Secondary | Relative Risk of Occurrence of Non-SA Clinical Infection in the Treatment Compared to Control Group in the Intent To Treat Cohort | Relative risk of occurrence of non-SA clinical infection in the treatment compared to the control group using the intent to treat (ITT) cohort for analysis. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having scheduled collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the non-SA clinical infection to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had a non-SA clinical infection but were still being watched for the event. Non-SA clinical infection was the development of a non-SA clinical infection due to an identifiable organism as evidenced by culture of an organism other than SA from a normally sterile body site or an infant who met the clinical diagnosis of localized infection as defined in the protocol. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have a non-SA clinical infection but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Relative Risk of Occurrence of Non-SA Clinical Infection in the Treatment Compared to Control Group in the According to Protocol Cohort. | Relative risk of occurrence of non-SA clinical infection in the treatment compared to control groups using the according to protocol (ATP) cohort. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having scheduled collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the non-SA clinical infection to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had a non-SA clinical infection but were still being watched for the event. Non-SA clinical infection was the development of a non-SA clinical infection due to an identifiable organism as evidenced by culture of an organism other than SA from a normally sterile body site or an infant who met the clinical diagnosis of localized infection as defined in the protocol. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have a non-SA clinical infection but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Median Time to Occurrence of Severe (Stage II-III) Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in the Treatment Compared to Control Group. | Median time to occurrence of severe (stage II-III) NEC in the treatment compared to control group as estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival curves. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Protective Efficacy of Clinical S. Aureus (SA) Infection in the Treatment Compared to the Control Group During Days 1-22 or Until Discharge, Whichever Occurs First, Using the Intent to Treat Cohort. | Protective efficacy of clinical SA infection in the treatment compared to the control group during days 1-22 or until discharge, whichever occurs first using the intent to treat (ITT) cohort. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having scheduled collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the SA clinical infection to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had a SA clinical infection but were still being watched for the event. SA clinical infection was the development of a SA clinical infection due to an identifiable organism as evidenced by culture of an organism from a normally sterile body site or an infant who met the clinical diagnosis of localized infection as defined in the protocol. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have a SA clinical infection but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 22 | |
Secondary | Protective Efficacy of Clinical SA Infection in the Treatment Compared to the Control Group During Days 1-22 or Until Discharge, Whichever Occurs First, Using the According to Protocol (ATP) Cohort. | Protective efficacy of clinical SA infection in the treatment compared to the control group during days 1-22 or until discharge, whichever occurs first using the ATP cohort. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having scheduled collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the SA clinical infection to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had a SA clinical infection but were still being watched for the event. SA clinical infection was the development of a SA clinical infection due to an identifiable organism as evidenced by culture of an organism from a normally sterile body site or an infant who met the clinical diagnosis of localized infection as defined in the protocol. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have a SA clinical infection but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 22 | |
Secondary | Median Time to Occurrence of Non-S. Aureus (SA) Clinical Infection in the Treatment Compared to Control Group | Median time to occurrence of non-SA clinical infection in the treatment compared to control group as estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival curves. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Relative Risk of Severe (Stage II-III) Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in the Treatment Compared to Control Group | The association between mupirocin treatment and severe (stage II-III) NEC on or before Day 85 was to be assessed via Cox Proportional Hazards Model. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Time Until Decolonization: Count of Participants From Day 1 Until the First NUP Collection With no S. Aureus (SA) Detected in the Nares, Umbilical, and Perianal Areas Using the Modified Intent to Treat Day 8 Cohort (mITT-8). | Time until decolonization: Count of participants from Day 1 until the first NUP collection with no SA is detected in the nares, umbilical, and perianal areas using the modified intent to treat (mITT-8) cohort. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the SA decolonization to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had SA decolonization but were still being watched for the event. SA decolonization was the absence of SA detected from the NUP cultures through direct plating. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have SA decolonization but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 85 | |
Secondary | Time Until Decolonization: Count of Participants From Day 1 Until the First NUP Collection With no SA is Detected in the Nares, Umbilical, and Perianal Areas Using the According to Protocol Day 8 (ATP-8) Cohort. | Time until decolonization: Count of participants from Day 1 until the first NUP collection with no SA is detected in the nares, umbilical, and perianal areas using the according to protocol day 8 (ATP-8) cohort. The time periods in the table correspond to the study days having scheduled collection of nasal, umbilical, and perianal (NUP) cultures. At risk participants were eligible for the SA decolonization to occur at the start of the interval, were still on study and had not yet had SA decolonization but were still being watched for the event. SA decolonization was the absence of SA detected from the NUP cultures through direct plating. Censored participants were at risk for some of the interval, did not have SA decolonization but were removed from eligibility for the event at some point after the interval started. | Day 1 through 85 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT02899702 -
Effectiveness of Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIG) in Toxic Shock Syndromes in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00770341 -
A Study of MK-3009 in Japanese Patients With Skin or Blood Stream Infections Caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MK-3009-002)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00352612 -
Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00279864 -
The Utility of Levofloxacin-Rifampin in the Therapy of Prosthetic Joint Infection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00735839 -
V710 Clinical Study in Healthy Male Japanese Subjects (V710-006) (COMPLETED)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00814151 -
MicroPhage S. Aureus / MSSA / MRSA Blood Culture Beta Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02812446 -
Staphylokinase and ABO Group Phenotype: New Players in Staphylococcus Aureus Implant-associated Infections Development
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00846105 -
Efficacy Study of Rapid Test to Prevent Hospital Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02284555 -
Study to Assess Eradication of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus Aureus (SA) With Mupirocin (Bactroban 2% Nasal Ointment)
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01592214 -
Study of the Safety and Local Tolerability of Intranasal Gel Formulations of XF-73
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00730028 -
Uncomplicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00729937 -
Strategies Using Off-Patent Antibiotics for Methicillin Resistant S. Aureus "STOP MRSA"
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 |