View clinical trials related to Stage IV Lung Cancer.
Filter by:This clinical trial implements a communication intervention to improve patient-oncologist communication in the outpatient medical oncology setting. A communication brochure called the ASQ brochure may help patients prepare for the doctor visit by thinking through the questions that patients and patients' family want to ask the doctor.
This study evaluates the change of quality of life, treatment decision and utilization of health care depending on the use of palliative care in advanced cancer patients by a prospective cohort study. Participants will be separated into different groups by their intentions for using palliative care. Every participant will carry out the questionnaire per 3 months. This cohort study will be ended a year after each participant enrolls. However, if the participant didn't survive during this study, the caregivers will be asked to fill out additional questionnaire after 3 months of the death.
This pilot clinical trial studies how well acceptance and commitment therapy works in improving well-being in patients with stage III-IV cancer and their partners. Learning how to accept negative thoughts and feelings and how to live in the present without worrying about the future or past may improve coping skills in patients with stage III-IV cancer and their partners.
This study assesses computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging in predicting treatment response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer or tumors that have spread from the primary site (place where it started) to the lungs (metastases) treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy. CT perfusion imaging is a special type of CT that uses an injected dye in order to see how blood flow through tissues, including lung tissue. CT perfusion imaging of the lungs may help doctors learn whether perfusion characteristics of lung tumors may be predictive of response to treatment and whether lung perfusion characteristics can be used to follow response to treatment.
Patients with metastatic cancer have a substantial symptom burden and may receive aggressive care at the end of life. There is evidence that the use of chemotherapy near the end of life is not related to its likelihood of providing benefit and the overuse of aggressive anticancer therapies near the end of life may result in more toxicity than clinical benefit. Moreover, proposing new lines of treatment after successive therapeutic failures may be a way of avoiding discussion of prognosis and advance care planning. It has been proposed that systems not providing overly aggressive care near the end of life would be the ones in which less than 10% of patients receive chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life. Presently the first consultation between patient and oncologist is ruled in France by the first "Plan Cancer" and the "Dispositif d'annonce" (announcement planning). Oncologists are supposed to explain the diagnosis of cancer and to present a treatment plan. In routine practice for metastatic non curable cancer patients, chemotherapy is presented as the leading therapy and its side effects are explained. The use of chemotherapy has been associated with the worsening of two major competitive life-threatening conditions for cancer patients: cachexia and thrombo-embolic events. Nevertheless the risk of worsening both those conditions is hardly explained in routine practice. This study proposes to examine in a monocentric interventional prospective randomized trial, the impact of a particular way for the oncologist to present chemotherapy at the diagnosis stage on the easiness of timely chemotherapy interruption at the end of life. The main objective is to determine whether or not the explanation of the potential role of anticancer chemotherapy in worsening life-threatening conditions impacts the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life compared with usual presentation. Secondary objectives are to determine the impact of this communication strategy on overall survival and other indicators of aggressiveness of care and palliative care resources use. The hypothesis is that the intervention will allow 15% of patients receiving anticancer therapy during the last 30 days of life, as compared to 30% in the control group. The investigators expect that the intervention evaluated in this study will reduce the rate of patients receiving chemotherapy during the last 30 days of life hopefully improving the quality of end of life care. A secondary objective is overall survival and this study will therefore verify that the intervention arm is not associated with poorer overall survival. But more probably investigators expect patients in the intervention arm to have an improved overall survival mainly link to a decrease in harms due to chemotherapy given near the end of life and to better palliative care. In effect the hypothesis is that showing the life-threatening risks associated with chemotherapy and thus reducing for patients the importance of this treatment will leave room for improved palliative care as shown notably by earlier and more frequent referral to palliative care specialists. If this trial is positive, it will prove the capital role of patient-doctor communication in cancer care and that few differences in communication strategy could improve end of life care and maybe even survival. The impact on the oncology community would be major since the intervention could be easily transposed in all practices at no additional cost. It would also emphasize the importance of communication skills and human relationship in the very technical field of medical oncology.
This randomized clinical trial studies radiation therapy and MK-3475 in treating patients with head and neck cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, or lung cancer that has returned, has spread to other parts of the body, or cannot be removed by surgery. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as MK-3475, may block tumor growth by targeting certain cells and causing the immune system to attack the tumor. Studying the effects of MK-3475 with radiation therapy on the body may help doctors learn whether it may be an effective treatment for these solid tumors.
Lung Cancer is to become the first cause of death related to cancer in France as it's already the case in United States. At Present, Lung Cancer in women and in men is treated similarly. Nevertheless, numerous studies shows that lung cancer in women has specificities : at the time of the diagnosis female patients are younger, there are less clinical signs, clinical stages are earlier, histology is often adenocarcinoma. The link with tabagism is weaker . Sensitivity to tabagism is higher (more cancer in women with the same tabagism). Response rate to chemotherapy is better. Prognosis is better Numerous hypotheses have been put forward to account for the specific characteristics of female lung cancer described above. - One hypothesis is that there are different genetic anomalies in women. Some studies show an increase of EGFR mutation and HER2 expression and a decrease of expression of repair enzymes (ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA) which can explain the increase sensitivity to tabagism and to chemotherapy. - Another hypothesis is that hormones play a role in oncogenesis. Indeed, lung cancer presents hormonal risk factors : pre-menopause, less than 3 kids, short menstrual cycle, hormone replacement therapy. Estrogens would have a deleterious effect on cancer incidence and on survival of lung cancer in women. Cellular and animal models show that ER pathway is activated in lung cancer and participates in oncogenesis. - Moreover an interaction between RE and EGFR pathway has been demonstrated on lung cancer cell lines and mouse models. EGFR-TKI have shown benefit in women with wild type EGFR or unknown status (with erlotinib) and in women with EGFR mutations (with gefitinib). In this study, the use of these two treatment will be in accordance with their market authorisations. The objective of this study is to test the addition of an anti-estrogen (fulvestrant) to EGFR-TKI. Fulvestrant is a pure anti-oestrogen that binds to ER, blocks it and accelerates its breakdown. It has a market authorisation in breast cancer. Furthermore the association between EGFR-TKI and anti-estrogen could have a synergetic effect due to interaction between RE and EGFR pathways .
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new program to help the patient and the caregiver make decisions about treatment for lung cancer. We need to know if a new information program is helpful to patients. The way that we will do this is by comparing it with the usual information program that we now provide. Patient are asked to make difficult decisions about their treatments. These decisions may include when to change treatments or when to stop treatment altogether. Most patients ask a family member or close friend to help them with these difficult decisions. A "caregiver" is someone they can count on to give support (either emotional or physical) over a period of time. The doctors and nurses will also help patients and their caregiver to make these decisions. They will tell them the risks with each treatment, the success with each treatment, and how much time there is for making each decision.