Clinical Trials Logo

Spondylitis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spondylitis.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • « Prev · Page 4

NCT ID: NCT01944163 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Chronic Low Back Pain

The IMPACT of a Referral Model for Axial Spondyloarthritis in Young Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

IMPACT
Start date: September 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rationale: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory back pain disorder affecting up to 24% of young chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. For general practitioners (GPs) it is difficult to distinguish axSpA patients in the large amount of CLBP patients. In previous studies a referral rule for axSpA applicable in CLBP patients was developed and validated. The next step is to investigate the impact of the referral rule in daily practice. This impact analysis will test if the referral rule will be beneficial or harmful. Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of a referral rule in young patients presenting at the general practitioners with chronic low back pain, who are at risk for axSpA, compared to usual care. Study design: A cluster randomized clinical trial. Study population: Primary care patients with chronic low back pain, aged 18-45 years. Intervention (if applicable): GPs are randomized in clusters either to use directly the referral rule or use the referral rule after 4 months. The referral rule consists out of four variables, a positive ASAS inflammatory back pain questionnaire, a positive family history for spondyloarthritis, a good reaction to NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and back pain duration longer than 5 years. If at least two out of four variables are present a referral to the rheumatologist is advised. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is a change in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) compared to baseline in the CLBP patients with or without use of the referral model. Secondary parameters: Quality of life measurements, cost-effectiveness, pain and fatigue and referral to rheumatologist and diagnosis of axSpA. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The burden and risks associated with participation are minimal. No medical intervention is taken place. If the GP of the patients is randomized to the referral model, the patient is checked for the risk of axial spondyloarthritis, by the non-invasive referral model. If the referral model is positive a referral to the rheumatologist is advised. Is the GP is randomized to the 'usual care' there is no difference in the treatment of low back pain than nowadays. A GP is still allowed to treat the CLBP patients optimal and a referral to the rheumatologist is allowed but not actively advised. All participating CLBP patients are asked to fill several questionnaires at four different time points, at baseline, after 12 months and after 24 months. In total there are 8 questionnaires and four separate questions. The questionnaire are designed to fill out by the patient themselves. The total time to fill in the questionnaire is estimated to be 30 minutes. The benefits of the study are: - For the CLBP patients, up to 24% of the back pain complaints are caused by axSpA, but the GPs are not (yet) aware of this disease. When a CLBP patient is participating in this study, the chance of having axSpA as cause for the back pain is investigated. This a benefit for a CLBP patients since there is effective treatment for axSpA. - For the GP it is very difficult to distinguish an axSpA patients in the large amount of CLBP patients. If it appears that the validated referral rule has an impact on CLBP and GPs, the next step will be implementation of this referral model in daily practice and it will become a helpful tool for the GP. - For the society, CLBP is a great socioeconomic burden for the society. When one of the causes for CLBP, namely axSpA is diagnosed and treated in an earlier stage this will lead to a decreased sick leave because of back pain and is therefore potentially cost-effective.

NCT ID: NCT01852851 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Employment and Arthritis: Making it Work

MIW
Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and the cost effectiveness of an on-line eLearning program (entitled Employment and Arthritis: Making it Work) designed to help people with inflammatory arthritis stay employed. The program also includes assessments with 1) an occupational therapist, and 2) a vocational rehabilitation counsellor at the end of the program to help participants identify and obtain necessary changes at work. People from three provinces will be recruited from collaborators' patient and program recipient lists. The study group will receive the program intervention and the control group will receive "usual care" and printed educational material. All participants will be followed for five years. The effectiveness of the program at improving at work productivity and reducing work cessation will be evaluated compared to a control group receiving printed material on employment and arthritis.

NCT ID: NCT01790022 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Efficacy and Safety of MEthylprednisolone Administered Intravenously for the Treatment of Patients With Active AnkyLosing spondyLitis (METALL)

METALL
Start date: July 2012
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

In this study, efficacy of methylprednisolone in reduction of signs and symptoms (back pain, stiffness, joint pain and swelling) of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) will be investigated. It is expected, that a single dose of methylprednisolone 500 mg given intravenously at baseline will lead to a rapid reduction of symptoms of active AS, which can be seen already 2 weeks after drug administration.

NCT ID: NCT01358175 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

16 Week Efficacy and 2 Year Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

MEASURE 1
Start date: October 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis who are intolerant to or have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs, DMARDs and / or TNFα inhibitor therapy.

NCT ID: NCT01289743 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Etanercept (Enbrel) in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Enbrel_AS-2
Start date: February 2002
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The study has the aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) over 520 weeks.

NCT ID: NCT01072058 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Heart Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis Pre and Post-TNF Blocker

Start date: February 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine possible alterations in cardiac function in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis under anti-TNF therapy, without clinical heart disfunction at baseline, using highly sensitive non-invasive methods.

NCT ID: NCT00243750 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Methotrexate in Ankylosing Spondylitis (MTX in AS)

Start date: September 2003
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Assessing the efficacy and tolerability of methotrexate 15mg sc in the first month of treatment- if well tolerated methotrexate 20mg sc in the following 3 months in patients with active anklyosing spondylitis

NCT ID: NCT00235105 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis

D2E7-Early AS

Start date: March 2005
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Reduction of signs and symptoms in patients with moderate to severely early axial spondyloarthritis (without radiological sacroiliitis) who have had an inadequate response to or do not tolerate NSAID therapy. Study Objectives:Efficacy –To assess whether patients with moderate to severely active early axial spondyloarthritis (without radiological sacroiliitis) will show response when adalimumab is added to the pre-existing or in case of intolerance to NSAID therapy. Response will be measured at week 12 by change of efficacy parameters compared to baseline.Safety – To demonstrate the safety of adalimumab in study patients with moderate to severely active early axial spondyloarthritis (without radiological sacroiliitis) in patients who have had an inadequate response to or do not tolerate NSAID therapy.