View clinical trials related to Spondylarthropathies.
Filter by:Spondyloarthritis, notably ankylosing spondylitis (AS), represents a chronic rheumatic condition typified by persistent back pain and stiffness. It constitutes a substantial portion of diagnoses within rheumatology units and exhibits a higher prevalence among males. Diagnosis relies upon comprehensive clinical evaluation, including patient history, physical examination, and adjunctive radiological assessments, with genetic predisposition, particularly the presence of the HLA-B27 antigen, playing a significant role. Management strategies encompass a multidisciplinary approach, with physiotherapy emerging as a cornerstone therapeutic modality. Various exercise interventions, particularly those supervised by trained professionals, demonstrate efficacy in improving pain, stiffness, and overall functional capacity. Furthermore, patient education plays a pivotal role in enhancing treatment adherence and optimizing outcomes by aligning patient expectations with therapeutic goals. The evolving landscape of spondyloarthritis management underscores the necessity of further research into multimodal treatment approaches, particularly in integrating novel interventions such as electrophysical agents. By elucidating the mechanisms of action and exploring their synergistic effects, clinicians can refine treatment protocols and ultimately enhance the quality of care provided to individuals living with spondyloarthritis.
Tofacitinib (TOFA) is a JAK inhibitor already used in rheumatology for the treatment of moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis in adult patients who have responded inadequately to, or who are intolerant to one or more disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs. Furthermore, TOFA has been recently approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) who had no response, lose response, or were intolerant to either conventional therapy or a biologic agent. The approval was based on the efficacy demonstrated by TOFA in three phase 3 randomized controlled trials named OCTAVE: two identically designed, 8-week, placebo- controlled, induction studies of oral TOFA 10 mg twice daily followed by the OCTAVE Sustain 52-week maintenance study. About sacroiliitis, 2 out of 8 patients treated with TOFA improved after 8 weeks, compared with 0 out of 3 patients in the placebo group. Obviously, these data should be interpreted with extreme caution since patient numbers were very low, and it should be again emphasized that these trials were not designed to explore the efficacy of TOFA onextraintestinal manifestations. On these premises, we designed a prospective, multicenter, observational, 52-week study with the aim of assess the effectiveness of TOFA on UC-associated spondyloarthropathy.
Idiopathic juvenile arthritis includes 20% of patients with arthritis with enthesitis or juvenile spondyloarthropathy. This is treated with anti-inflammatory drugs and then followed by biotherapy with DMARDs (Drugs Modifying the Activity of Rheumatic Disease) if the former are insufficient. Methotrexate (MTX) may also be used before these biotherapies. Recently, in adults, a particular profile of intestinal microbiota has been shown to alter the availability of MTX making it in efficient. Knowing that pediatric patients with juvenile spondyloarthropathy have an imbalance of their intestinal flora (dysbiosis) the investigators wanted to explore whether DMARDs could have a similar impact on the microbiota of these young patients and alter the response to treatment.
This study evaluates the intestinal microbiome and disease activity in patients with spondyloarthropathies receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Patients will be analysed at two time points in reference to two predefined primary endpoints: - Changes in intestinal microbiome - Response to therapy The investigators want to evaluate if successful treatment of spondylarthropathy coincide with specific changes in the gut flora.
The purpose is to study the use of virtual reality (VR) and biofeedback in rheumatology clinics to help manage chronic pain in patients with rheumatologic diseases. The objective is to know the usefulness of VR/biofeedback-based therapy in the clinic.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from human bone marrow at a dose of 1.0E+6 MSC/kg in subject for the therapy of Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to compare the efficacy of MSCs and Etanercept to treat this disease.
The aim of this study is to establish the efficacy and duration of effect of intra-articular (IA) infliximab vs intravenous infliximab vs current standard care (IA steroid injections) in seronegative oligoarthritis. All patients will have seronegative arthritis affecting less than 5 joints but including at least one knee. 10 patients will receive IA infliximab injections to the affected knee, 10 will receive IA steroid injections to the affected knee and 10 will receive a course of intravenous infliximab. Patients will not be aware of their group as this is a placebo-controlled study.
Background: Existing criteria for AS/SpA such as mod. New York, ESSG, or Amor criteria for classification and/or diagnosis of spondyloarthritis have limitations when applied to early disease. Moreover, MRI is not part of any of the established criteria and the precise role of MRI in early axial disease has not been fully defined yet. Even less is known about sacroiliac (SI) changes in SpA patients with peripheral symptoms. A pilot study using data from 'paper patients' led to new candidate criteria for early spondyloarthritis. Subsequently, the members of the ASAS International Working Group decided to conduct a prospective multi-centre study to evaluate (validate) the new candidate criteria, and to assess their performance as diagnostic criteria. Aims of the study: 1. To evaluate the new candidate criteria for axial SpA in a multi-centre setting. 2. To assess the potential role of the new candidate criteria to be used as diagnostic criteria. To accomplish this, inclusion of consecutive and undiagnosed patients is mandatory as are longer periods of follow-up . 3. To compare criteria encompassing the whole group of SpA such as ESSG and Amor criteria against criteria which are tailored to either predominant axial disease or predominant peripheral disease. To accomplish this, both patients with predominant axial disease (back pain) but also patient with predominant peripheral disease (arthritis/enthesitis) will be included.