View clinical trials related to Spine Degeneration.
Filter by:This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application in improving postoperative rehabilitation outcomes among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
With the extended life expectancy of the Chinese population and improvements in surgery and anesthesia techniques, the number of aged patients undergoing surgery has been increasing annually. However, safety, effectiveness, and quality of life of aged patients undergoing surgery are facing major challenges. This prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled study aims to construct a prehabilitation combined with enhanced recovery after surgery program which includes pre-operative risk assessment and targeted intervention.
The goal of this prospective, multicenter clinical trial is to determine if the use of the postoperative outcome prediction model the Dialogue Support tool can alter postoperative patient-reported outcome and satisfaction compared to current practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does its use alter patient-reported outcome measured by general assessment regarding leg pain and Satisfaction in lumbar spinal stenosis? - Does its use alter patient-reported outcome as measured by general assessment regarding arm pain and Satisfaction in cervical rhizopathy? - How does the Quality of Life in patients - who after assessment by spinal surgeon do not proceed to surgery - compare with patients with the same baseline profile who did undergo surgery? Eligible participants will be presented with their predicted postoperative outcome generated by the Dialogue Support tool, as an adjunct to the ordinary assessment by a spine surgeon. Researchers will compare participants with a matched control group from the Swedish Spine Register ("Swespine") to see if the Dialogue Support tool can alter postoperative patient-reported outcome and satisfaction.
Spinal cord injury following posterior decompression in patients suffering from chronic, cervicothoracic spinal cord compression is a known complication with multiple etiologies. Currently, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) remains the gold standard for predicting and preventing post-operative deficits from these procedures. However, there is a paucity in the field of spine surgery for further, non-invasive biomarkers that can help detect and prognosticate the degree of spinal cord injury intraoperatively. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a radiation free imaging modality that utilizes nanobubble technology to allow for visualization of the macro- and microvascular architecture of soft tissue structures. Despite being currently approved for the use in hepatology and cardiology, it has remained absent from the field of spinal cord injury. The study team aims to evaluate and quantify micro- and macrovascular changes that lead to areas of hyper-perfusion as well as areas of ischemia intraoperatively in patients that undergo elective cervicothoracic posterior decompression for chronic compression. In addition, the study team aims to assess the efficacy of CEUS in detecting microvascular changes that correlate with IONM changes and predicting degree and recovery of post-operative neurologic deficits from intraoperative spinal cord injury. The study team hypothesizes that following decompression, subjects will have detectable levels of microvascular changes causing areas of hypoperfusion and reperfusion injury. Second, the study team hypothesizes that these perfusion changes will correlate with intraoperative neuromonitoring changes and can predict and prognosticate the degree of post-operative neurologic injury.
Sleep disorders affect 40% of the adult population each year and are often associated with morbidity and mortality (Kripke et al., 2002; F.-Z. Low et al., 2017). Sleep quality plays a vital role in the overall quality of our lives. Therefore, a good sleep helps to create a quality life rhythm. A quality sleep reduces fatigue and increases physical regeneration (Khaleghipour et al., 2015). Poor sleep quality is due to various environmental factors such as temperature, light, noise and bed quality (Lei et al., 2009). It has been reported that 7% of sleep problems are caused by inappropriate mattresses that affect the load on the spine during sleep (F. Z. Low et al., 2017). Body contact pressure is a measure of the distribution of body weight across the body surface in contact with the mattress. A well-designed mattress usually has the ability to minimize high pressure points applied to the body. However, if the bed is not suitable for the person, pressure sores may develop in the body parts where pressure is intense (Cullum et al., 2004). The areas most affected by high pressure are usually the hips, shoulders and back, which can affect sleep quality and result in drowsiness or body stiffness throughout the day (Jacobson et al., 2002). A recent study by Bae and Ko compared the bed positions of hospital beds and found that a head-to-foot angle of 30° is the best position to reduce the likelihood of decubitus ulcers occurring in patients in high-pressure risk areas (Bae & Ko, 2013). In the light of previous studies, it has been observed that there is no study comparing many bed types designed using different materials for individual-specific postures. Biomechanical comparison of these bedding materials in individuals with different posture types and sleeping in different sleeping positions will allow us to provide new insights into their pressure distribution abilities. The aim of this study is to measure the effect of mattresses made of different mattress materials on body contact pressure profiles in individuals with different postures in various sleeping positions. It will be evaluated using maximum body pressure and pressure distribution as outcome measures.
Obtain deep tissue samples from patients undergoing primary prosthetic surgery of the shoulder and patients undergoing primary instrumented surgery of the spine. Patients will be randomized to receive benzoyl peroxide 3 days prior to surgery.
International, prospective, single arm, multicenter and observational Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF). The overall objective of this study is to collect preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative (at 9 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years) data on the clinical complications and functional outcomes of the study devices to demonstrate safety and performance in a real-world setting. The primary objective is to demonstrate that the use of the study devices is safe. The secondary objective is to demonstrate that the use of the study devices decreases the pain, and improves the quality of life and the daily activities of the subjects.
The objective of the study is the establishment, optimization and prospective evaluation of a digital predictive platform capable of providing for each lumbar spine operated patient a clinical predictive status: Patient green (success) orange (treatment failure ), red patient (complication) in order to optimize his medical care up to 6 months.
Summary: Low back pain is the leading cause of deficiency and loss of productivity worldwide. No evidence of any particular exercise was more effective than another for treating nonspecific low back pain. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of two resistance training protocols, with different techniques for performing lower limbs exercises, in improving vertebral posture and reducing symptoms of low back pain. Methods: Randomized parallel clinical trial with two arms: Restricted Group (GR) performed all squat and Stiff exercises with neutral vertebral posture and the Complete Group (CG) performed the same exercises prioritizing the complete range of motion. Both groups had a 12-week intervention with 36 resistance training sessions. This study was conducted between November 2020 and April 2021 in Goiás (Brazil). Thirty-two participants aged 18 to 69 years with nonspecific low back pain were recruited in the extension project of the Faculty of Physical Education and Dance of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), at the Hospital das Clínicas - UFG and at the Campos Samambaia Health Center. To ensure blindness, participants did not know why the technique of movement between them was different. The movement technique was monitored by one teacher per participant throughout the training and cannot be altered by participants at risk of compromising the results. Spinal posture was evaluated by three-dimensional reconstruction and posture quantification using dynamic posture software and pain symptoms were evaluated by the Brief Pain Inventory and Rolland Morris Questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed in the Software SPSS and MATLAB. The Shapiro-Wilk and Bartlett tests were used to confirm the normal distribution and similar variances in the distribution of the data. The other quantitative and qualitative variables were analyzed by nonparametric statistical methods. Quantitative data with normal distribution were reported by means of means and standard deviation, minimum and maximum values, and the other data by median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum values. The pre-intervention conditions of the groups were compared by independent t-test. Two-way ANOVAs (groups X time) were used for group intervention effect comparisons for quantitative data variables with normal distribution. Significance level of 5%. The size of the effect of the results will be calculated using cohen's test.
Rationale: Cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) is a common cause of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative therapies do not provide sufficient relief or when neurological complaints are progressive. The main surgical techniques are anterior cervical discectomy with (ACDF) or without fusion (ACD), whereas both techniques result in high fusion rates. Short term outcomes of surgery show good clinical results. Long term follow-up shows a drop-in satisfaction rates, often due to the occurrence of new complaints. Pathology is often located at levels adjacent to the previously operated segment, known as adjacent segment disease (ASDis). This is thought to be the results of loss of motion at the previously operated and fused segment. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is developed in an effort to reduce the incidence of ASDis by preserving physiological motion in the operated segment. Objective: To investigate physiological motion of the cervical spine the investigators will analyze motion patterns at the long-term in patients who underwent surgical treatment for CDDD, either ACD or ACDA. Study design: Fundamental research. This is a prospective study that includes a cohort of patients previously operated in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Study population: Adult patients with an indication of surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy as a consequence of CDDD were enrolled in an RCT between 2007 and 2014 and assigned to undergo ACD or ACDA. Flexion and extension cinematographic recordings of the cervical spine were performed, with the last one at one-year follow-up. The majority of patients in the ACDA group (80%) showed a normal sequence of segmental contribution, which was not the case in the ACD group. This cohort will now be asked to participate in the long-term follow-up study assessing the motion patterns 6-13 years after ACD or ACDA surgery. Intervention: One flexion and extension cinematographic recording of the cervical spine and will be made. Main study parameters/endpoints: The sequence of segmental contributions in sagittal rotation during flexion and extension of the cervical spine will be assessed in the long-term follow-up of surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes will be to assess the amount of degeneration based on the Kellgren Score (KS) and the segmental range of motion (sROM). Long term clinical outcomes will be assessed according to VAS, NDI, SF-36 and Odom's criteria. Patients will be asked whether they have new neurological symptoms and whether they have had a re-operation. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participants receive cinematographic recordings once. The amount of radiation is a negligible risk. There will be no health benefits. There will be no follow-up.