Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Stenosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Stenosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01618435 Active, not recruiting - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

The Clinical Effect of i-FACTOR® Versus Allograft in Non-instrumented Posterolateral Spondylodesis Operation in the Elderly With Spinal Stenosis Due to Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

IVANOS
Start date: March 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudication(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavus, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc. Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation. Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.(Ausman). Clinical improvement including decrease of pain, improved ADL-function and an increased quality of life are parameters of highest interest and the purpose of an operation is clear: Making sufficient room for the affected nerves. In addition fusion is desired achieving stability avoiding a new compression of the nerves. Studies attending these issues find a correlation between fusion and clinical outcome, why obtained fusion of the affected levels are very important(Andersen et al.;Andersen et al.;Girardo et al.;Kornblum MB FAU - Fischgrund et al.). P-15, bound to Anorganisk Bone Mineral (ABM), called i-FACTOR®, shows fusion superiority, no side effects and no risk of transferring disease(Thorwarth et al. 5648-57;Thorwarth et al. 789-95;Wenz, Oesch, and Horst 1599-606;Scarano et al. 318-24;Kubler et al. 171-79) why the investigators find this material suited for fusion surgery in the elderly. To the investigators knowledge this is the first prospective study comparing fusion rates and postoperative clinic with i-FACTOR vs allograft in older patients operated with decompression and spondylodesis because of spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis. Hypothesis: There are no difference in the clinical parameters measured by ODI and fusion rates comparing i-FACTOR® and allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis-operations in patients 60 years and older.

NCT ID: NCT01522846 Completed - Brain Tumor Clinical Trials

Heparin Solution and INTEM/HEPTEM Analysis

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Heparinized solution has been used for maintenance of arterial catheter during perioperative period. Although the infused dose of heparin is very low, the investigators examine whether the heparin effect is remained or not in blood using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) analysis.

NCT ID: NCT01485289 Completed - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Stabilimax Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Clinical Investigation Patient Followup Study

Start date: August 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The intent of this study is to complete the collection of clinical data on subjects enrolled in the Stabilimax Dynamic Spine Stabilization IDE clinical trial (#G060214) sponsored by the now defunct Applied Spine Technologies Inc . The Applied Spine assets, including the clinical trial data, were acquired by Rachiotek, LLC in 2010. When Applied Spine ceased their funding of the trial, a number of enrolled patients had not yet completed the two year follow-up visit defined as the study endpoint in the clinical investigation plan. No additional patient treatment is required to complete the study. Rachiotek has interest in pursuing IDE approval for a new study and the information collected in this study is essential for supporting the new Investigational Device Exemption application.

NCT ID: NCT01456377 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Spinal Stenosis of Lumbar Region

The Effectiveness of Oral Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis

Start date: July 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of systemic corticosteroids administered orally in narrow lumbar canal syndrome.

NCT ID: NCT01455805 Completed - Clinical trials for Degenerative Disc Disease

Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Start date: June 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is a common disorder of narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back. This causes discomfort in the legs when standing or walking because of pressure on the spinal nerves.There are several treatment options for LSS including physiotherapy, lumbar surgical decompression procedures such as laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Discectomy and more recently devices for interspinous distraction such as the XSTOP® and from May 2011 Minuteman™. Surgical decompression for LSS involves the removal of excess bone, ligament, and soft-tissue allowing more room for the nerves. The operation is usually preformed under general anaesthetic and with an average stay in hospital for 2-3 nights. Whereas the Minuteman™ implant is preformed as a day case under local or general anaesthetic and involves implanting the device into the space between two back bones to relieve pressure on the nerves and, therefore, pain in the legs. This is a multi centred (four sites) randomised controlled trial with a total sample of 50 participants after obtaining their informed consent. Participants will attend the pain clinic at the Hospitals for a baseline visit where they will be randomised with a ratio of 1:1 to receive either the Minuteman™ Interspinous interlaminar fusion Implant or standard surgical decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Following randomisation arrangements will be made for the participant to receive the randomised treatment. If allocated to Minuteman™ Implant, the treatment will be conducted by the Pain Specialist identified at the site. If allocated to surgical decompression, the treatment will be conducted by the neuro/spinal-surgeon identified at the site. Participates will be followed up regularly for 60 months post implant to assess clinical efficacy, safety, participants function and quality of life of each treatment.

NCT ID: NCT01452516 Terminated - Clinical trials for Degenerative Disc Disease

Effectiveness of Lumbar Fusion When NanOss Bioactive Is Used With Posterolateral Gutter Fusions

Start date: July 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Spine fusion is one of the most common procedures performed in spinal surgery. Several surgical techniques can achieve a solid union, but the intertransverse posterolateral fusion (PLF) is the most widely used. However, complications can develop when the bone graft material used is insufficient to achieve the desired fusion. With its unique properties, nanOss Bioactive can be mixed with bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and other graft materials to obtain new bone growth during the healing process. It is hypothesized that the use of nanOss Bioactive will result in fusion at 12 months, with CT evidence of bridging trabecular bone, less than 3mm of translational motion, and less than 5 degrees of angular motion. In addition, patients are expected to see an improvement in Oswestry Disability Index scores, VAS pain scores, and SF36 scores, while decreasing the use of pain medication, returning to work, and finding satisfaction in the results of their surgery.

NCT ID: NCT01452022 Completed - Clinical trials for Degenerative Disk Disease

Performance of Inductigraft in Spinal Fusion

APOLLO
Start date: October 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is an open-label non-randomised, prospective, post market study to evaluate the performance of Inductigraft (osteoinductive synthetic bone graft) in patients receiving posterolateral lumbar spine fusion through assessment of successful fusion at 12 months post operation using x-rays and CT scans. Quality of life questionnaires also used to assess clinical outcome measures such as pain and quality of life. Patients followed up for 24 months after surgery.

NCT ID: NCT01377623 Completed - Inflammation Clinical Trials

Pilot Study on the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Inflammatory Responses in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion

Start date: September 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The aim of the proposed study is to examine the effect of DEX on the inflammatory response in major surgery. More importantly, the investigators will correlate changes in the concentration of inflammatory mediators with meaningful clinical outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT01338766 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Spondylolisthesis Treated With an iO-Flex® System Enabled Decompression

STRiDE
Start date: April 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a decompression using the FDA cleared iO-Flex® System on-label in treating patients with spinal stenosis and stable grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using a precision estimate assuming a 55% positive response rate.

NCT ID: NCT01316211 Completed - Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Start date: January 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A 2 year comparative evaluation of clinical outcome in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with and without additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology