View clinical trials related to Spinal Stenosis.
Filter by:The purpose of this trial is to assess whether the Total Posterior Spine System (TOPS System) is more effective than transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) when used to stabilize a single lumbar level (L2 - L5) following surgical decompression in patients diagnosed with (1) at least moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, and (2) Grade 1 spondylolisthesis (or retrolisthesis), and (3) thickening of the ligamentum flavum or scarring of the facet joint capsule. Success will be assessed by means of a composite endpoint that measures improvement in in patient reported outcomes and the absence of any major device related complications.
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of a full-scale multicenter randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two surgical treatments for a condition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis called degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Both treatments are currently used, but individual surgeons use different selection criteria for each treatment and use the procedures at different rates. The two procedures are decompression with fusion (the most common surgical procedure for spondylolisthesis) and midline-sparing decompression alone (which is also a standard treatment, but is not as widely used for treating spondylolisthesis). The investigators plan to collect the evidence on the following: 1. The feasibility of the trial protocol, and 2. Preliminary data on the effectiveness of each treatment.
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) is a clinical entity were narrowing of the spinal canal gives a compression of the the neural and vascular structures in the spinal canal. This often gives neurogenic claudication and sometimes severe Low Back Pain (LBP). Surgery for LSS is today the most often performed procedure in the adult lumbar spine. Beneficial effect of surgical treatment is well documented by several clinical trials, and a Cochrane review article from 2005 concludes that surgical treatment is superior to non-surgical treatment. The surgical solution is to decompress the stenotic part of the lumbar spine. There is no consensus in the literature of which surgical method that gives best long term clinical results. The investigators are therefore planning a Randomized Controlled Trial, where they will compare clinical and radiological results of three different surgical methods for LSS. The main outcome of this study is to answer which surgical method that gives the best long term clinical results. And, secondary outcome is to find out how much increase of the Dural Sac Cross Sectional Area is needed to give a long time relief of the patients` symptoms.
A Randomized, Blinded Comparison of Surgical Intervention with the Coflex® Interspinous Implant versus Surgical Decompression for Patients with Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication caused by Lumbar Stenosis
The average life expectancy in Denmark is increasing resulting in an increasing part of the population having age-related disease, ex lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). LSS causes constriction of the nerves in the lumbar spine resulting in pain in the legs and lower back, especially when standing and walking, known as neurogenic claudication(Goh KJ FAU - Khalifa et al.). LSS occurs in a combination of degenerative changes in the lower back, including hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavus, arthrosis of the facet joints and bulging of the disc. Current treatment of LSS is varied ranging from non-operative conservative treatment to operation. Operative intervention shows very good results according to physical ability and pain(Christensen FB et al.;Hee HT and Wong;McGregor AH FAU - Hughes and Hughes;Xu et al.), but the most optimal treatment is still debated. Nevertheless, a decompression and, if needed, a spinal fusion is recommended.(Ausman). Clinical improvement including decrease of pain, improved ADL-function and an increased quality of life are parameters of highest interest and the purpose of an operation is clear: Making sufficient room for the affected nerves. In addition fusion is desired achieving stability avoiding a new compression of the nerves. Studies attending these issues find a correlation between fusion and clinical outcome, why obtained fusion of the affected levels are very important(Andersen et al.;Andersen et al.;Girardo et al.;Kornblum MB FAU - Fischgrund et al.). P-15, bound to Anorganisk Bone Mineral (ABM), called i-FACTOR®, shows fusion superiority, no side effects and no risk of transferring disease(Thorwarth et al. 5648-57;Thorwarth et al. 789-95;Wenz, Oesch, and Horst 1599-606;Scarano et al. 318-24;Kubler et al. 171-79) why the investigators find this material suited for fusion surgery in the elderly. To the investigators knowledge this is the first prospective study comparing fusion rates and postoperative clinic with i-FACTOR vs allograft in older patients operated with decompression and spondylodesis because of spinal stenosis due to degenerative spondylolisthesis. Hypothesis: There are no difference in the clinical parameters measured by ODI and fusion rates comparing i-FACTOR® and allograft in non-instrumented posterolateral spondylodesis-operations in patients 60 years and older.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a decompression using the FDA cleared iO-Flex® System on-label in treating patients with spinal stenosis and stable grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using a precision estimate assuming a 55% positive response rate.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the iO-Flex® System in reducing pain and symptom severity in patients with one or two level lumbar spinal stenosis that requires surgery.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical safety and feasibility of the NL-Prow™ Interspinous Spacer implant and insertion procedure in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
The Archus Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®) is a non-fusion spinal implant indicated for treatment of patients with moderate to severe spinal stenosis. TFAS® replaces the diseased facets following surgical removal. TFAS® offers the surgeon new options for treating spinal stenosis patients, enabling a more comprehensive decompression via complete removal of the facets. TFAS® also offers an alternative to rigid spinal fusion fixation enabling intervertebral motion. The clinical trial is intended to demonstrate restoration of stability and sagittal balance to the spine. TFAS® also eliminates the need for painful bone graft harvest from the patient's hip which may be required with fusion procedures.