View clinical trials related to Spinal Metastases.
Filter by:The goal of this single-center prospective randomized controlled trial is to test and compare the safety and effectiveness of autologous blood transfusion in spinal surgery for lung cancer spinal metastases. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does autologous blood transfusion increase the incidence of new metastases? - Does autologous blood transfusion affect postoperative hemoglobin levels and the number of circulating tumor cells in the blood? - Can autologous blood transfusion reduce the rate of allogeneic transfusion during and after surgery for spinal metastases?
Train-METASTRA is a retrospective study that will be performed in order to collect a large and harmonised amount of clinical and imaging data concerning vertebral metastases, focusing in particular on the risk of fractures. This type of dataset will be created from the medical records of 2000 patients admitted in the last ten years in the four European clinical centers participating in METASTRA project: "COMPUTER-AIDED EFFECTIVE FRACTURE RISK STRATIFICATION OF PATIENTS WITH VERTEBRAL METASTASES FOR PERSONALISED TREATMENT THROUGH ROBUST COMPUTATIONAL MODELS VALIDATED IN CLINICAL SETTINGS", funded by the European Union under the call "HORIZON-HLTH-2022-TOOL-12-two-stage/Computational models for new patient stratification strategies". The project is coordinated by the University of Bologna (UNIBO) (PI prof. Luca Cristofolini) and involves 15 European partners, including Sarl Voisin Consulting Life Sciences VCLS, University of Szeged (Hungary), University of Sheffield (UK) and FrontEndART (Hungary). This type of dataset is not currently available in the literature and it will be pivotal to the development of the METASTRA computational models for the stratification of the risk of fracture of patients affected by spinal metastases.
In order to provide theoretical evidence for the comprehensive and standardized treatment of spinal metastases with pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, the investigators conduct this trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of IORT and postoperative SBRT in adjuvant treatment of metastatic spinal tumors after posterior decompression surgery by recruiting patients with spinal metastases who met the inclusion criteria, and randomly divided them into the following treatment cohorts: 1) decompression surgery + IORT (15-20 Gy, 20-50min）; 2) decompression surgery and postoperative SBRT(30Gy, 5 fractions, 3 weeks).
With significant advances in diagnostic imaging and systemic therapies for oncologic disease, spinal metastasis with neurological dysfunction and mechanical instability has become an indication for surgery. Even if traditional-open surgery was palliative, the treatment of spinal metastasis also carried significant surgical morbidity. Those high morbidity and complication rates may influence the quality of patients with a limited life expectancy. Invasion-controlled surgery was utilized with Robot-assisted surgery approach against symptomatic spinal metastasis. Increasing interest in the potential for improved consistency, complication reduction, and decreased length of hospitalization through robot utilization is evident from the rapid growth of publications seen in recent years. So, the investigators wish to evaluate the advantages of Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery compared with traditional-open surgery spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.
Since patients with spinal metastases are living longer, durable palliation with long-term tumor control are becoming increasingly important. EBRT results in durable local control of bone metastasis. However, about 25 % of patients with spinal metastases only achieved complete pain relief following EBRT for a median duration of less than 4 months. This could be partly due to spinal instability. In addition, almost half of the patients who receive EBRT will subsequently develop VCFs . Hence, RT does not stabilize the spine secondary to VCFs and is not effective in preventing imminent VCFs. Vertebroplasty has rapidly reduced pain and improved function in patients with VCFs. However, vertebroplasty does not provide local tumor control similar to EBRT. It is theorized that combining vertebroplasty with EBRT will stabilize the spine, relieve the pain, prevent imminent VCFs and minimize or avoid the need for opioids. It is hypothesized that combining a spine stabilization procedure such as vertebroplasty with RT will be the most effective management for patients with spinal metastases than RT alone for patients with spinal metastases. Combined vertebroplasty and radiotherapy is not a standard treatment option at present. This study is designed to quantify the advantage of adding vertebroplasty to radiotherapy for patients with spinal metastases. If the study is proven to be significant, it could become the standard of care for patients with spinal metastases.