Clinical Trials Logo

Spinal Fractures clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Spinal Fractures.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03692143 Active, not recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Comparation of Treatment Strategies for OVF: Teriparatide Injection and PVP

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aimed to compare teriparatide treatments and PVPs, focusing on its effects on life qualities and effect/coast ratio and evaluate which method is better for patients.

NCT ID: NCT03682328 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteoporotic Fracture of Vertebra

Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures.

Start date: October 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Vertebral body fractures are a major health care problem in all countries with incidence 1.4%. They are a common cause of severe debilitating pain, with consequent deteriorated quality of life, physical function and psychosocial performance. Surgery is indicated in patients with vertebral body fracture, and concurrent spinal instability or neurologic deficit. The cornerstone of management for vertebral body fractures without neurological impairment is medical therapy, which include analgesics, bed rest, orthoses and rehabilitation. In the majority of patients such treatment modalities are effective. However, conservative management measures are not indicated for every type of fracture. For example, in older patients with vertebral fractures and cardio-respiratory disease it is not possible to prescribe bedrest for long period. Moreover, sometimes anti-inflammatory drugs are poorly tolerated by older patients, and bed rest can lead to further demineralization of the vertebrae, predisposing to future fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive vertebral augmentation methods for cement application into the vertebral body are a useful tool for the management of symptomatic fractures without neurological impairment when conventional measures of treatment can not be adopted. Two different percutaneous minimally invasive vertebral augmentation methods for cement application into the vertebral body for the management of symptomatic vertebral body fractures without neurological impairment have been developed, namely vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty have gained wide acceptance worldwide to manage patients without neurological impairment suffering from unmanageable pain caused by vertebral body fractures. Both procedures depend on mechanical stabilization of the fracture produced by cement injection into the fractured vertebral body. Cement augmentation of the vertebral body by vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty was originally introduced for osteoporotic compression fractures, but surgeons have now applied these techniques as a method of enhancing anterior column support while avoiding the morbidity and complications associated with anterior approaches. The mainstay of the controversy between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are height restoration, whether or not this height restoration is clinically significant, and the risks related to height restoration.

NCT ID: NCT03644407 Recruiting - Scoliosis Clinical Trials

Galeazzi Spine Surgery RegistryGaleazzi Spine Registry: Prospective Study for Clinical Monitoring

SPINEREG
Start date: November 10, 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The SPINEREG study is a prospective observational registry. Eligible patients are subjects undergoing spine surgery at the participating institutions. Baseline health status and follow-up health status are recorded at pre-established steps.

NCT ID: NCT03617094 Completed - Vertebral Fracture Clinical Trials

Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

AGIL11
Start date: July 5, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of carrying out early vertebroplasty procedure, compared to the standard conservative treatment (corset), in order to prevent residual deformations that could occur in complications of vertebral fractures that are medically treated using a corset. This is a monocentric, randomized, parallel group, prospective and open-label study.

NCT ID: NCT03593330 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Neurosurgical Transitional Care Programme

TCP
Start date: April 15, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Readmissions increasingly serve as a metric of hospital performance, inviting quality improvement initiatives in both medicine and surgery. Recently, a readmission reduction program in the United States was associated with significantly shorter length of stay, earlier discharge, and reduced 30-day readmission after elective neurosurgery. These results underscore the importance of patient education and surveillance after hospital discharge, and it would be beneficial to test whether the same approach yields beneficial results in a different health system, the NHS. In this study, the investigators will replicate the Transitional Care Program (TCP) published by Robertson et al.(Journal of Neurosurgery 2017) with the goal of decreasing length of stay, improving discharge efficiency, and reducing readmissions in neurosurgical patients by optimizing patient education and post-discharge surveillance.

NCT ID: NCT03451305 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Osteoporosis Fracture

Postrual Reduction With Pillow in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture

Start date: January 23, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Vertebroplasty in the symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral fracture has become increasingly popular. However, there have been some limitations in restoring the height of the collapsed vertebrae and in preventing the leaking of cement. In the severely collapsed vertebrae of more than two thirds of their original height, vertebroplasty is regarded as a contraindication. We tried postural reduction using a soft pillow under the compressed level. This study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of the combination of postural reduction and vertebroplasty for re-expansion and stabilization of the osteoporotic vertebral fractures. single level vertebral compression fracture were treated with postural reduction followed by vertebroplasty. We analyzed the degree of re-expansion according to the onset duration.

NCT ID: NCT03369288 Recruiting - Vertebral Fracture Clinical Trials

Assessing Cement-bone Incorporation and Adjacent Segment Degeneration Following Cement Augmentation; an MRI-PET Follow-up

Start date: December 5, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

3-year PET-MRI follow-up after vertebral balloon kyphoplasty aiming to investigate cement incorporation.

NCT ID: NCT03360383 Not yet recruiting - Spinal Fractures Clinical Trials

Effect and Essentiality of Vertebroplasty Surgery in Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures

Start date: February 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Percutaneous vertebroplasty is now a common procedures of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in medical units all over China, but the efficacy and essentiality of the surgery remain uncertain and is the subject of this study. This is a multiple center open-label randomised trial. Patients were randomly allocated to percutaneous vertebroplasty or conservative treatment. Because of the procedure , neither patients nor investigators were blinded. The primary outcome was pain relief at 1 month and 1 year.

NCT ID: NCT03359941 Terminated - Fractures, Bone Clinical Trials

Acupuncture Treatment for Vertebral Compression Fracture

Start date: February 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCF) may experience pain, limitation of daily activities, and various complications (e.g., insomnia, constipation, urinary infection, depression, diminished quality of life). Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of acupuncture treatments to achieve pain relief and functional recovery in patients with VCF.

NCT ID: NCT03316703 Recruiting - Spinal Fracture Clinical Trials

Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.

Start date: May 9, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The thoracolumbar segment fractures are the most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated in unstable fractures. Surgical treatment has been performed through the posterior fixation pedicle fixation systems, and where necessary complemented by decompression of the spinal arthrodesis and previous channel. Surgical treatment has been performed by conventional open approach through the posterior incision on the midline, and detachment and removal of paraspinal muscles to access the posterior vertebral elements. The percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced in the context of spinal surgery to reduce the morbidity associated with conventional open approach. It has been reported the lowest bleeding intra- and postoperative period, less pain, shorter hospital stay, rehabilitation and return to work faster with less use of minimally invasive percutaneous approach of the spine. However, predominates in the literature of clinical case reports and few prospective and randomized clinical trials. The performance of prospective randomized clinical trials have been required for the evaluation of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of the thoracolumbar spine fractures. The objective of the study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine using the conventional open approach or minimally invasive percutaneous approach to the stabilization of the vertebral segment affected, and using similar type of pedicle spinal fixation system. Patients will be evaluated in the preoperative, postoperative, 1,2,3,6,12 and 24 months by parameters related to the perioperative (intraoperative bleeding, surgery time), clinical (VAS, SF-36, HADS, EQ-5D-5L), images (radiographs and computed tomography). The study results will impact the guidelines of the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures and may indicate the advantages or disadvantages of using surgery through conventional open approach to minimally invasive percutaneous surgery.