Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trial
Official title:
Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
NCT number | NCT00833105 |
Other study ID # | 4649 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | January 2009 |
Est. completion date | January 2012 |
Verified date | April 2019 |
Source | Oregon Health and Science University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine if tetraplegic individuals with incomplete spinal
cord injury (SCI) who remain unable to move their arms normally 1 year after their SCIs are
able to sense and move the affected arm(s) better after 10-13 weeks of treatment with a new
robotic therapy device.
The hypothesis is that using the AMES device on the arm(s) of chronic tetraplegic subjects
with incomplete SCI will result in improved strength, sensation, and functional movement in
treated limb(s).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 13 |
Est. completion date | January 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2011 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Traumatic SCI with tetraplegia. - Male or female. - 18-65 yrs old. - At least 1 yr post-SCI. - Tolerate sitting upright at for at least one hour. - Able to perceive direction of passive joint(s) motion of the upper extremity(ies) to be treated 70% or more of the times tested. - Motor grade >1 in the wrist extensors, finger flexors and finger abductors (the 3 muscles related to hand movements in the ASIA scale) in the upper extremity tested. - Cognitively and behaviorally capable of complying with the regimen. Exclusion Criteria: - Fracture of the treated limb resulting in loss of range of motion - Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study) - DVT of the treated extremity - Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity - Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion - Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM - Skin condition not tolerant of device - Progressive neurodegenerative disorder - Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month - Chronic ITB therapy - Uncontrolled seizure disorder - Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina - Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Shepherd Center | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Oregon Health and Science University | Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA |
United States,
Cordo P, Lutsep H, Cordo L, Wright WG, Cacciatore T, Skoss R. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Jan;23(1):67-77. doi: 10.11 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Grasp Release Test | The task involves picking up, transporting, and placing six objects (i.e., peg, paperweight, fork, block, can, and videotape). Movement of each of the 6 objects is scored based on the number of times the participant can move the object in 30 seconds, with a minimum score of zero if no objects are successfully moved. A cumulative score is based on the sum of all completed movements for all 6 objects. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | ASIA Motor Key Muscles | ISNCSCI Assessment of motor function (upper limb only). Scores on a scale ranging from 0 (i.e., total paralysis) - 5 (i.e., full range of motion) for each of 5 upper limb muscle groups. Total score represents the overall level of the upper limb impairment and represents the sum of the 5 scores from the 5 upper limb muscle groups. Accordingly, the total score has a range of 0-25, with 0 representing a completely paralyzed upper limb and 25 representing a normally functioning upper limb. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/ Light-Touch | Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light touch by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | ASIA (ISNCSCI) Sensory/Key Sensory Points/Pin-Prick | Measures the subject's sensory perception, with eyes closed, of a light prick of a safety pin produced by the tester on 9 key sensory points of the hand, arm, shoulder and neck. Sensation at each key point is rated as a number on a scale from 0 (no feeling) to 2 (normal feeling), with a score of 1 representing partly diminished feeling. The overall sensation of the upper limb and nearby areas is represented as the sum of all 9 individual key point scores and, therefore, has an overall range of 0-18, with higher scores representing better sensation. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | Van Lieshout Hand Function Test for Tetraplegia- Short Version | Measures the functional movement in the upper limb of people with cervical spinal cord injury. The short version of this test includes a total of 10 different functional tasks to be performed by the subject with the upper limb. For example, one task is to reach and pick up a filled Coke bottle, set it down, and then replace it in its original position. Each task is scored on a scale of 0-5, 0 representing inability to perform the task and 5 representing normal movement. A single, total score is calculated as the sum of the scores on the 10 tasks, and therefore, has an overall range of 0-50, with higher scores representing better performance. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | Modified Ashworth Scale | Measurement of joint stiffness (tone/spasticity). Score is based on sum of MAS value for 4 muscle groups: (1) Wrist/finger flexors, (2) Wrist/finger extensors, (3) elbow flexors, and (4) elbow extensors. Each muscle group and direction is score on a scale of 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 5 (rigid), with a score of 2 used instead of 1+. A single overall score representing the sum of all 4 muscle groups and directions is used and has a range of 0-20 with higher scores representing more severe impairment. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | Capabilities of Upper Extremity Instrument | Subjective questionnaire of participants' self-perceptions of upper limb function that contains 17 questions relating to the use of the right upper limb, the same 17 relating to the use of the lower upper limb, plus two additional questions relating to bimanual function. Responses to each item of the questionnaire has a range of 1 (i.e., "totally limited") to 7 (i.e., "not at all limited"). A total cumulative score used for the study is based on the sum of the responses to all 34 questions (i.e., 16 right arm, 16 left arm, 2 both arms), and therefore has a cumulative score range of 32 - 224, with higher scores indicating more function. | Prior to training (baseline), after 25 training sessions (about 8 weeks), 3 months post-training | |
Secondary | Strength Test - Thumb/Finger Extension | Maximum strength of thumb-and-fingers in extension. Pre-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 3 scores, including 1 score from each of the last 3 days of training. |
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) | |
Secondary | Strength Test - Thumb/Fingers Flexion | Maximum strength of Thumb/fingers in Flexion Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training. |
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) | |
Secondary | Strength Test - Wrist Extension | Maximum wrist strength in extension Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training. |
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) | |
Secondary | Strength Test - Wrist Flexion | Maximum strength in flexion direction Pre-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the first 3 days of training. Post-training score is average of a total of 9 efforts, including 3 efforts from the last 3 days of training. |
Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) | |
Secondary | Active Motion Test - Fingers/Thumb | Tracking task for the thumb and finger, i.e., opening and closing the hand. The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the thumb and fingers, first in the opening direction, then closing, and finally opeining again. The participant's thumb-and-finger position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training. | Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) | |
Secondary | Active Motion Test - Wrist | Tracking task for the wrist, i.e., flexing (i.e., pull with the front of the hand) and extending (i.e., pushing with the back of the hand). The participant tracks a target box on a video screen by actively moving the hand at the wrist, first in the extension direction, then flexion, and finally extension again. The participant's wrist position is represented on the video screen by a vertical line that he/she attempts to keep in the the target box. Performance on this task is scored as the amount of time, in seconds, that the participant keeps the line in the target box. The maximum total score in this test is 60 seconds. The "Pre-training Score" is the average score obtained during the first 3 days of training, and the Post-training Score" is average score obtained during the last 3 days of training. | Prior to training (baseline), after each of 25 training sessions (about 3 times/week) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02574572 -
Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplantation in Cervical Chronic and Complete Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05941819 -
ARC Therapy to Restore Hemodynamic Stability and Trunk Control in People With Spinal Cord Injury
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05265377 -
Safety and Usability of the STELO Exoskeleton in People With Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02331979 -
Improving Bladder Function in SCI by Neuromodulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02777281 -
Safe and Effective Shoulder Exercise Training in Manual Wheelchair Users With SCI
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02978638 -
Electrical Stimulation for Continence After Spinal Cord Injury
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02262234 -
Education Interventions for Self-Management of Pain Post-SCI: A Pilot Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02161913 -
Comparison of Two Psycho-educational Family Group Interventions for Persons With SCI and Their Caregivers
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02237547 -
Safety and Feasibility Study of Cell Therapy in Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02080039 -
Electrical Stimulation of Denervated Muscles After Spinal Cord Injury
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01642901 -
Zoledronic Acid in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01884662 -
Virtual Walking for Neuropathic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01433159 -
Comparison of HP011-101 to Standard Care for Stage I-II Pressure Ulcers in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01471613 -
Lithium, Cord Blood Cells and the Combination in the Treatment of Acute & Sub-acute Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01467817 -
Obesity/Overweight in Persons With Early and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02149511 -
Longitudinal Morphometric Changes Following SCI
|
||
Completed |
NCT01086930 -
Early Intensive Hand Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01005615 -
Patterned Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Ergometry of Arm and Shoulder in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00663663 -
Telephone Intervention for Pain Study (TIPS)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01025609 -
Dietary Patterns and Cardiovascular (CVD) Risk in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Factors In Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
|