Effects of Robotic Versus Manually-Assisted Locomotor Training for

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to collect data comparing two means of providing locomotor training: manual and robotic and the possible differential effects it may have on walking ability for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Clinical Trial Description

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most disabling health problems facing adults today, with one of the consequences often being inability to walk or difficulty walking. Recent studies suggest that intensive step training on a treadmill using body-weight support (BWS) and manual assistance that provides repetitive task-specific sensory cues to the neural axis can improve the recovery of walking for persons with incomplete SCI. More recently, robotics have been developed as an alternative to manually-assisted training. Robotic-assisted training may allow for increased intensity of training, improve the reproducibility and consistency of training, and reduce the personnel needed to implement the training. However, the effects of robotic-assisted training compared to manually-assisted training are not known. An improved understanding of these differential effects and the mechanisms of improvement in walking can facilitate continued advances in evidenced-based practice of neuro-rehabilitation, therefore improving the treatment of persons with SCI.

The primary objective of this project is to assess and compare the effects of robotic-assisted versus manually-assisted locomotor training (LT) using the body-weight support (BWS) on sub-tasks of walking. Specifically, we believe that at least four sub-tasks of walking are differentially affected by the robotic-assisted training when compared to manually-assisted training (propulsion, transition from stance to step, stepping, and equilibrium). The investigators hypothesize that robotic-assisted training will have a greater effect on improving propulsion, transition and equilibrium. The effect of these two modalities on adaptability, a fifth sub-task of walking, is unclear; therefore, a development component of the pilot project will involve establishing a quantitative measure of adaptability and assessing differential effects of training. Participants will be randomized to one of two training groups: robotic-assisted or manually-assisted, and evaluated for performance on sub-tasks of walking. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00127439
Study type	Interventional
Source	VA Office of Research and Development
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	June 2005
Completion date	April 2009

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06321172` - Muscle and Bone Changes After 6 Months of FES Cycling	N/A
Completed	`NCT03457714` - Guided Internet Delivered Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Trial
Recruiting	`NCT05484557` - Prevention of Thromboembolism Using Apixaban vs Enoxaparin Following Spinal Cord Injury	N/A
Suspended	`NCT05542238` - The Effect of Acute Exercise on Cardiac Autonomic, Cerebrovascular, and Cognitive Function in Spinal Cord Injury	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05503316` - The Roll of Balance Confidence in Gait Rehabilitation in Persons With a Lesion of the Central Nervous System	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05506657` - Early Intervention to Promote Return to Work for People With Spinal Cord Injury	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04105114` - Transformation of Paralysis to Stepping	Early Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT03680872` - Restoring Motor and Sensory Hand Function in Tetraplegia Using a Neural Bypass System	N/A
Completed	`NCT04221373` - Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in SCI Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation	N/A
Completed	`NCT00116337` - Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Cough	N/A
Completed	`NCT03898700` - Coaching for Caregivers of Children With Spinal Cord Injury	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04883463` - Neuromodulation to Improve Respiratory Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04881565` - Losing Balance to Prevent Falls After Spinal Cord Injury (RBT+FES)	N/A
Completed	`NCT04864262` - Photovoice for Spinal Cord Injury to Prevent Falls	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04007380` - Psychosocial, Cognitive, and Behavioral Consequences of Sleep-disordered Breathing After SCI	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04544761` - Resilience in Persons Following Spinal Cord Injury
Completed	`NCT03220451` - Use of Adhesive Elastic Taping for the Therapy of Medium/Severe Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord Injured Patients	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03170557` - Randomized Comparative Trial for Persistent Pain in Spinal Cord Injury: Acupuncture vs Aspecific Needle Skin Stimulation	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04811235` - Optical Monitoring With Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Spinal Cord Injury Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04736849` - Epidural and Dorsal Root Stimulation in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Effects of Robotic Versus Manually-Assisted Locomotor Training for Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury — DE

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms