View clinical trials related to Spinal Anesthesia.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of low dose scheme with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant. Taking in consideration optimum intraoperative surgical conditions, best post-operative pain free experience, and more stable hemodynamic.
This study evaluate the ability of phenylephrine and of noradrenaline to maintain normal systemic arterial blood pressure and heart rate in healthy pregnant women submitted to cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Half of participants will receive bolus of phenylephrine while the other half will receive bolus of noradrenaline.
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) induced maternal hypotension is the most frequent and troublesome complication in cesarean section (CS), compromising both maternal and neonatal well-being. Many strategies have been used to prevent its occurrence but no single technique has been confirmed to be completely effective. the investigators hypothesized that ondansetron, a serotonin-receptor-antagonist, could have beneficial effects on maternal hemodynamics during CS under SA. METHODS: In this prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study, one hundred healthy parturients were randomized to receive either 8 mg of intravenous ondansetron (group O) or the same volume of saline (group S), 5 minutes prior to the induction of SA. All women received a coloading volume of 500 ml of saline. Maternal hemodynamics: blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output (CO) were measured with a non-invasive device based on pulse wave transit time: the esCCO device Nihon Kohden hemodynamic monitor. Ephedrine was administered to treat hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 80% of baseline).
This was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Seventy-six patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for surgery were randomized into the Shotblocker group or Control group. Before the insertion of a 25-gauge spinal needle, Shotblocker was applied just before the spinal needle insertion in the Shotblocker group. 10-cm visual analog scale to evaluate the pain intensity of spinal needle insertion and a five-point scale for patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthesia method in cesarean section to provide satisfactory analgesia and muscle relaxant with less impact on respiratory system. However, hypotension often occurred due to the block of sympathetic nerve, causing maternal decline of frontal lobe oxygenation, nausea vomit and the decrease of uteroplacental perfusion. Several measures are used to prevent or treat hypotension caused by spinal anesthesia: prehydration, limb compression, left lateral tilt of operation tables or usage of vasopressors. In the past decade, the most recommended vasopressor to prevent or treat hypotension in spinal anesthesia in cesarean section was phenylephrine, an α-adrenergic receptor, maintaining maternal blood pressure and fetal acid-base state. In clinical work, there are two ways to use phenylephrine : intravenous method with less onset time (several seconds and duration (several minutes) and intramuscular method with longer onset time (10-15 minutes) and duration (1 hour). Many trials demonstrated the protective effect of preventive intravenous phenylephrine on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal acid-base status. However, few trials reported the effect of preventive intramuscular phenylephrine on cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Comparison will be conducted between continuous variable infusions of Phenylephrine with starting dose of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min and Norepinephrine Bitartrate with starting dose of 0.1 mcg/Kg/min (with norepinephrine base of 0.05 mcg/Kg/min) for prophylaxis against Post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery
Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia are often sedated to reduce patient discomfort due to large noises during surgery and also to reduce anxiety. Most commonly used sedatives include propofol and midazolam, but these agents often cause hypotension or respiratory depression, especially in elderly patients. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha 2 adrenergic drug, which acts as a sedative and also has analgesia effects. In contrast to propofol or midazolam, dexmedetomidine rarely causes respiratory depression, and therefore is often used in critically ill patients in the ICU and also in patients undergoing simple procedures. Hemodynamically, dexmedetomidine evokes a biphasic blood pressure response with a short hypertensive phase and subsequent hypotension. Bradycardia is also observed in many patients, which may lead to more serious outcomes in elderly patients who often have multiple comorbidities. Therefore, drugs to prevent bradycardia during dexmedetomidine infusion may help patients maintain a more stable hemodynamic state. The present study aims to compare the ability of atropine and glycopyrrolate to prevent bradycardia during dexmedetomidine infusion in elderly patients undergoing knee surgery with spinal anesthesia.
The investigators will compare variable infusion of phenylephrine (at a starting rate of 0.75 mcg/Kg/min) with fixed rate (0.75 mcg/Kg/min which will stop of reactive hypertension occurred) and single shot (1.5 mcg/Kg) phenylephrine.
The study is designed to compare the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia performed with fixed dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine regardless of patient's height and weight and anesthesia with the dose of bupivacaine that is adjusted to their height. Our clinical experience shows that spinal anesthesia using specific, relatively high dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with opioid is very effective, regardless of parturient's weight and height, provides very good surgical conditions and assures patient's comfort while the rate of anesthesia - related complications is similar or less. Therefore, using height-adjusted protocols, although preferred in some centres, might not be necessary in order to provide good anaesthesia for cesarean delivery. Fixed dose regimen may have some additional advantages in obstetric anesthesia settings, as many of cesareans are performed out of hours, giving less room for mistakes in less experienced hands. Two groups of parturients undergoing cesarean section are to be compared: anesthetized with fixed-dose regimen (intervention group) and anesthetized with height-adjusted dose regimen (control group). Patients are going to be randomized to one of the above groups, two anesthetists will be involved in anesthetic procedure: anesthetist that looks after the patient throughout the procedure will be blinded to the dose of anesthetic given intrathecally. Therefore his judgment of anesthetic effectiveness is not going to be biased and all patients will receive the same perioperative care in terms of fluid therapy, management of possible anesthesia - related complications and postoperative pain control. Rate of effective spinal anesthetics, defined as adequate block level and no need for additional intraoperative analgesia has been established as primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures are rate of complications and amount of opioids used postoperatively. These are going to be statistically compared.
Cesarean section commonly induces moderate to severe pain for 48 hours. These patients have additional compelling reasons to provide adequate pain relief as early mobilization is a key factor to prevent the risk of thromboembolic event which is increased during pregnancy. Beside these, patients need to be pain free to takecare for their newborn and breastfeed them. Poorly controlled pain after cesarean section also increases risk of chronic pain and postpartum depression. Intrathecal morphine is considered the "gold standard" for postoperative pain relief after cesarean delivery. The duration of analgesic effect of morphine extend to 12-24 hours. Its widespread use is due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, ease of administration and low cost. Although intrathecal morphine is highly effective, its use is associated with undesirable adverse effect particularly nausea, vomiting and pruritus which reduce overall patients' satisfaction. More serious complication is the risk of delayed maternal respiratory depression. The Quadratus Lumborum block was first described in 2007 which demonstrates a spread to the paravertebral space, thus leads to a more extensive block to T5-L1 nerve branches and a long lasting block with the potential to provide visceral pain relief. Therefore, this block has an evolving role in postoperative analgesia for many lower abdominal surgeries. As the safety is concerned, there has been one report of a patient with unilateral hip flexion and knee extension weakness leading to unplanned overnight admission following lateral quadratus lumborum block after laparoscopic gynaecological operation. If the result favors effective, it will have the advantage of a combination with intrathecal opioid to prolong the pain free period after cesarean section which has about 4,000 cases per year.