Clinical Trials Logo

Specific Phobia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Specific Phobia.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1 ·  Next »

NCT ID: NCT06370559 Completed - Anxiety Disorders Clinical Trials

Relationship Between Repetitive Negative Thinking and CBT Outcomes

Start date: January 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the role of repetitive negative thinking (measured by the RTQ) in adult populations from an anxiety disorders and trauma clinic. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether the repetitive negative thinking can be used to predict i. initial symptom severity, and ii. therapy outcome (measured by change in scores on disorder specific measures). - Whether change in RTQ mediates change in outcome Participants are sent weekly questionnaires that measure their progress. Within these questionnaires are the RTQ and other disorder-specific measures that we will be analysing. Researchers may also compare clients with different disorders to see the accuracy the RTQ can predict treatment outcomes for each disorder.

NCT ID: NCT05300061 Completed - Specific Phobia Clinical Trials

Values Interventions for Increasing Engagement With What is Feared in Individuals With Specific Phobias

Start date: September 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Exposure is considered the therapy of choice for specific phobias (SPs). Nevertheless, therapy engagement is extremely limited. SPs are maintained through avoidance of feared stimuli and as such willingness to approach what is feared constitutes a key factor that could explain limited treatment engagement. Values interventions, a key element of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), might be one way to increase engagement, yet to this date limited research exists in this area. For the purposes of the current study, two brief values interventions were developed: (a) a personal and (b) a prosocial one. These will be compared to (c) a no-instructions control in increasing willingness to approach and approach behaviour towards phobic stimuli. Ninety participants with flying phobia will be randomly allocated to one of the three groups. To measure willingness to engage with feared stimuli and approach behaviour two behavioural approach tasks using novel technologies (virtual reality), which aimed to expose participants to situations analogous to real life, were developed. Willingness and behavioural approach towards airplanes at a one month follow up will also be assessed. Therefore, it is hypothesised that: 1. Participants in either of the two values intervention groups will have greater willingness to engage and approach behaviour towards feared stimuli compared to those in control, during the study tasks. 2. Participants in either of the two values intervention groups will have greater willingness to engage and approach behaviour towards feared stimuli compared to those in control at follow up. Additionally, as prosocial values provide an evolutionary advantage, the second study aim was to identify if they lead to greater engagement with phobic stimuli compared to personal ones. Therefore, it was also hypothesised that: 3. Participants in the prosocial values group will have greater willingness to engage and approach behaviour towards feared stimuli compared to those in personal values group, both during the study tasks and at follow up. 4. Participants in the prosocial values group will have greater willingness to engage and approach behaviour towards feared stimuli compared to those in personal values group at follow up.

NCT ID: NCT05284435 Completed - Clinical trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Internet-Based, Parent-Led Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Youth With ASD

Start date: March 28, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study compares the effectiveness of two levels of therapist support for an internet-based, parent-led cognitive behavioral therapy for youth with anxiety and ASD.

NCT ID: NCT04737915 Completed - Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

Virtual Reality Exposure Versus In Vivo Exposure for Fear of Heights

Start date: June 11, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study randomly assigned 114 participants with significant fear of heights to one of three conditions: a) a single session of virtual reality exposure; b) a single session of in vivo exposure; or c) a control condition. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of virtual reality exposure to the efficacy of in vivo exposure or no exposure for participants with significant fear of heights.

NCT ID: NCT04504773 Completed - Specific Phobia Clinical Trials

Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Treat Pediatric Anxiety

Start date: September 17, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Anxiety is a common and impairing problem for children. The principle treatment for pediatric anxiety involves facing a child's fears in a stepwise approach through a therapeutic exercise called exposures. While exposures are effective, some feared situations cannot be confronted in a clinician's office (e.g., heights, public speaking, storms). This poses a logistical challenge in treatment that: (1) takes time away from patient care, (2) leads clinicians to rely on imagined exposures, and/or (3) requires families to complete exposures outside of the therapy visits. This creates a burden for clinicians and families, and impedes treatment success. Immersive virtual reality (VR) presents an innovative solution that allows children to face fears without leaving the clinician's office. While VR has been used to distract children during painful medical procedures, it has not been well examined as a primary treatment for pediatric anxiety. This study proposes to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of using immersive VR exposures to treat children and adolescents with specific phobias.

NCT ID: NCT04470882 Completed - Specific Phobia Clinical Trials

Use of Safety Behaviors in Exposure Therapy for Arachnophobia

Start date: February 28, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study examines the impact of safety behaviors (i.e., unnecessary protective actions) on outcomes of exposure therapy for spider phobia. Researchers will compare exposure therapy with (a) no safety behaviors, (b) safety behaviors faded toward the end of treatment, and (c) unfaded safety behaviors.

NCT ID: NCT04111874 Completed - Clinical trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Parent-Led Cognitive-Behavioral Teletherapy for Anxiety in Youth With ASD

Start date: July 30, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study implements an anxiety-focused, parent-led, therapist-assisted cognitive behavioral teletherapy for parents of youth with ASD and anxiety.

NCT ID: NCT03720795 Completed - Clinical trials for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Stepped-Care Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Youth With ASD and Anxiety

Start date: February 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study implements a parent-led, flexible, individually-tailored cognitive-behavioral intervention for children with ASD and anxiety.

NCT ID: NCT03688373 Completed - Specific Phobia Clinical Trials

Facing Fears in Big or Smalls Steps?

Start date: October 4, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Anxiety problems are a major concern of youth mental health given that the prevalence of anxiety disorders in Dutch adolescents aged 12 to 18 is approximately 10 percent. In this group, specific phobias are among the most common. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with exposure as its key ingredient, takes a prominent place in national guidelines for the treatment of anxiety disorders. These guidelines are based on empirical support that exposure is effective in the treatment of specific phobia. Therapists help phobic adolescents to overcome their fear by gradually, step by step, working their way up from less scary situations to situations that cause a greater deal of anxiety. Although it is clear that exposure is effective, the size of the steps to be taken in this process remains unclear. However, there are multiple reasons to assume that one or the other works best. On the one hand, adolescents will soon gain trust in their own abilities when taking small steps, which enlarges their feeling of self-control (e.g., self-efficacy). On the other hand there is the risk that these small steps might be experienced as safety behavior and avoidance, which is counterproductive to the essence of exposure (i.e., overcoming the fear) and undermines the potential effect. This might result in either a longer treatment or insufficient treatment benefits. Considering this risk, and the fact that confrontation with a feared object or situation in daily life is also not a step-by-step process, this study proposes to evaluate the optimal dosage of exposure, by studying whether exposure in big steps is more effective than exposure in small steps.

NCT ID: NCT03688360 Completed - Specific Phobia Clinical Trials

Facing Fears In-session or Out-session?

Start date: October 4, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Anxiety problems are a major concern of youth mental health given that the prevalence of anxiety disorders in Dutch children aged up to 12 is approximately 4 to 8 percent. In this group, specific phobias are among the most common. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) with exposure as its key ingredient, takes a prominent place in national guidelines for the treatment of anxiety disorders. These guidelines are based on empirical support that exposure is effective in the treatment of specific phobia. Yet, despite the empirical evidence of its efficacy, a gap between theory and practice remains, with exposure-based CBT being underused in clinical practice. For example, a recent Dutch survey found that exposure was mostly practiced outside the formal therapy sessions as homework assignment. It is questionable whether this is effective, given that it might be hard for children to do these assignments independently (e.g., without the help of a therapist or their parents). This study therefore proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of different degrees of therapist and parent involvement during exposure, comparing therapist supported exposure with self-supported exposure with and without the use of parents as co-therapists.