Spatial Neglect and Delirium After Stroke

Stroke Clinical Trial

Official title: Right Brain Stroke and the Neural Substrate of Delirium

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to understand what brain mechanisms become disrupted when stroke survivors experience delirium. Delirium is an acute reduction in attention and cognition, associated with poor recovery, longer hospitalization and even death. One major factor increasing the risk of delirium after stroke may be spatial neglect occurring after stroke on the right side of the brain. Spatial neglect affects awareness, orientation, and movement. The study will test the hypothesis that the right-dominant brain networks for arousal and attention are affected in both of these disorders. It is expected that the activity and structural integrity of these brain networks will correlate with behavioral signs and severity of delirium and spatial neglect. To test this hypothesis, the study will measure spatial neglect and delirium symptoms in 45 acute (NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue ) and 30 subacute (Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation) stroke survivors and evaluate brain scans for these participants. This study may contribute to knowledge about brain bio-markers of delirium, which will greatly aid in delirium detection in stroke and other disorders.

Clinical Trial Description

Delirium assessment and prevention has a tremendous impact on hospitalization outcomes and health care costs. Delirium is a multi-component syndrome characterized by an acute reduction in cognitive functioning, affecting awareness, thinking, attention, and memory. Stroke survivors, representing 17% of the US population aged 65 and over (CDC, 2012), are at major risk for developing delirium (up to 50% incidence in right-hemisphere stroke). Further, about 50% of right-hemisphere stroke patients experience spatial neglect, impairing safety and recovery. This study investigates a potential neural mechanism explaining the high incidence of both delirium and spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. The study hypothesis is that the brain networks for arousal and attention, comprised of ascending projections from the mesencephalic reticular formation and integrating right-dominant dorsal and ventral cortical and limbic components, may be affected in these disorders. The study assesses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and behavioral data in right hemisphere stroke survivors. It is predicted that impaired activity and structural integrity of the brain networks for arousal and attention will correlate with behavioral signs of delirium and spatial neglect. The study will be conducted at two sites recruiting an acute (n=45) and a subacute (n=30) patient samples. The findings of this study have the potential to impact stroke care by providing a critical biomarker and behavioral profile of post-stroke delirium. This may alert clinicians to initiating preventive care and targeted interventions in patients who are at high risk of hospital morbidity and loss of independence. Study Hypotheses Hypothesis 1: It is hypothesized that a lesion-deficit analysis will reveal that in patients with delirium and/or spatial neglect, right-brain areas within the attention, orientation, and arousal networks are affected by stroke lesions. Hypothesis 2: Because it is hypothesized that both disorders stem from a dysfunction of common brain networks, it is expected that spatial neglect severity will be a predictor of delirium severity, controlling for relative lesion size and stroke severity Hypothesis 3: Both spatial neglect and delirium severity will be correlated with functional connectivity among the brain areas within the attention, orientation, and arousal networks. Hypothesis 4: Based on evidence from prior work in post-surgical delirium patients, neglect and coma patients, it is hypothesized that the integrity of white matter connections among brain regions comprising the cortical and subcortical networks for attention, orientation, and arousal is inversely correlated with the severity of delirium and spatial neglect. Planned Analyses: Hypothesis 1: To examine the critical network components affected in post-stroke delirium, the study will examine participants' structural scans. The structural scans recorded in the study will include a T1-weighted and a T2-weighted FLAIR image for 30 subacute stroke par-ticipants. In addition, clinical scans will be obtained for the 45 acute stroke participants, resulting in 75 total brain scans. Structural lesions will be mapped using a semi-automated lesion mapping in MRIcron package, where each brain voxel will be scored in a binary fashion as lesioned or non-lesioned. Three-dimensional lesion masks will be fed into VLSM 2 software implemented in Matlab (Voxel Lesion Symptom Mapping). For the pseudo-continuous outcomes, such as the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) and Confusion Assessment Method-Severity (CAM-S) scores, a t-score will be computed testing whether lesion in a given brain voxel predicts higher or lower severity score. For the binary outcomes, such as delirium diagnosis, for each voxel a Leibermeister measure will be computed testing whether a given lesioned voxel predicts delirium vs. no delirium across all participants. The analysis will serially travel through the brain voxels and conduct a test in each voxel. The voxels will be thresholded such that only those that co-occur in at least 5 patients will be considered. In a typical lesion study this will result in hundreds of voxels considered across participants. The final results are corrected for multiple comparisons using False Discovery Rate of p<.05. Hypothesis 2: This hypothesis seeks to establish if any association exists between the presence and severity of post-stroke delirium and spatial neglect. To test this hypothesis a regression analysis will be conducted using the BIT score as the predictor and the CAM score as an outcome. The analysis will control for NIH stroke scale score and lesion size, as well as age. In both sets of analyses raw assessment scores will be converted to percent for scale uniformity. Hypothesis 3: A seed-based functional connectivity analysis will be carried out, testing for a correlation among time-courses of selected brain regions as a function of CAM-S and BIT scores. 16 regions of interest (ROI) will be used to conduct this analysis within the arousal and attention networks. A whole brain ROI-to-voxel analysis will also be carried out to capture any unexpected associations with delirium and neglect severity. This analysis and data preprocessing will be done using CONN toolbox, a Matlab-based cross-platform software for the computation, display, and analysis of functional connectivity in fMRI. First, realignment will be performed between all successive brain volumes and the 1st volume of the series. Slice-timing correction will be applied to account for the time difference in the interleaved acquisition of brain slices. Structural segmentation will be performed to create masks of white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). These masks will be used in estimating a nuisance regressor representing physiological noise. The functional scans will be normalized (aligned) to the structural scans and the atlas template. This is done for group comparisons and to allow ROI definition using an anatomical atlas. Functional images will be smoothed with a 6mm-radius kernel. Next, the contribution of motion outliers (large movements), continuous motion (roll, pitch, and yaw), and physiological noise will be regressed from the data. Finally, ROI-to-ROI and ROI-to-voxel connectivity will performed within each brain scan to allow for 2nd-order comparisons (i.e., contribution of delirium and neglect severity scores to functional connectivity, controlling for covariates). Hypothesis 4: A probabilistic tractography analysis will be conduced using 16 ROI, defined a priori from the literature. The analysis will be carried out on DTI data using diffusion tensor tractography tools available in the FSL analysis suite (e.g.., Probtrax, FDT Toolbox). The analysis is expected to identify tracts that connect regions within the attention and arousal networks. It will estimate voxel-wise Fractional Anisotropy (FA) as a measure of fiber integrity. FA is a scalar value between 0 and 1, measuring the principal diffusion direction of water molecules. An FA of 0 indicates a perfect sphere, i.e., uniform diffusion. Places where adjacent voxels have the same directional coherence of diffusion are probabilistically assigned to tract locations. The values are then averaged to obtain a global FA for each tract. Delirium and neglect severity scores will be regressed on FA values in an ANCOVA (accounting for clinical/demographic/physiological/patient characteristics). If the ROI-based approach is not successful, whole brain FA maps will be considered including areas outside the brain networks of interest, for an association with delirium and neglect severity scores. Sample Size Determination. A pilot investigation was conducted to estimate effect size. 19 right-brain stroke patients (12 females, 8 Caucasian, 8 African American, 3 Asian), aged 60 years (SD=17 years), comprised of 1 chronic (> 6 months post-stroke) and 18 subacute (< 1 month post-stroke) participated in the pilot study. R-squared value of .26 was obtained for the association between delirium and neglect severity. This gives an effect size (Cohen's f2) of .35. With this effect size, there is over 99% power to observe the effect, assuming a sample size of 75 patients and an alpha of .05 (Hypothesis 2) To estimate power of our lesion deficit analysis (Hypothesis 1), data was simulated using 15%, 30%, and 50% as proportion of the participant sample in whom the same voxel will be lesioned. Leibermeister approach was applied to compute p-values for testing the null hypothesis of no association between voxel lesion status and delirium status. With 75 participants (Acute+Subacute Sample) there is over 80% power to detect an effect, assuming that at least 30 percent of the sample have the same lesion, and the lesion is between 40-100 voxels, forming a tight cluster. These are reasonable assumptions given past studies. In the pilot study, a general linear model that included as regressor delirium or neglect severity score was applied to the 16X16 ROI connectivity measure matrix for each participant. The resulting t-scores for the between-subjects effects were in the range of 4.61 to 7.88 for the BIT measure and 7.07 to 9.31 for the CAM-S. These t-scores correspond to a large effect size. Using a Cohen's f of .35 (large effect) to estimate power for linear multiple regression, with 4 predictors, an alpha level of .05, and a two-tailed test, it is estimated that there will be 87% power to observe this effect, given a sample of 30 participants (Acute sample) (Hypothesis 3). A previous study reported thalamus fractional anisotropy (FA) of .315 (.026) in delirious compared to .333 (.023) in non-delirious patients. These values correspond to a large Cohen's d effect size. Assuming that FA values in a similar range will be observed, there is excellent power to detect these effects with a linear multiple regression model. Based on average patient flow, is is estimated that up to 20 patients will be screened monthly for study eligibility at each site. Based on recruitment rates of the pilot sample, it is estimated that 10-20% of the screening sample will be consented. Factoring in a conservative dropout estimate of 25-40%, it is more than likely that the proposed study sample will be recruited. To account for patient attrition, the study will over-recruit the target sample by 5 patients. Estimated rates of delirium and neglect after right brain stroke are around 50% . Therefore, around 50 of the study sample is expected to have neglect, delirium, or both. In addition to using delirium/neglect status as a dichotomous variable, quasi-continuous severity scores for each variable will be used, which will increase the power to detect associations between these two disorders and brain lesion locations. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Delirium
• Spatial Neglect
• Stroke

• NCT number: NCT03349411
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]
• Source: Kessler Foundation
• Status: Completed
• Start date: July 18, 2017
• Completion date: December 30, 2020