Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05507736
Other study ID # PS-20-21
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 15, 2022
Est. completion date December 31, 2022

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
Contact Esther Martinez, MD
Phone +34 932532100
Email esther.martinez@sjd.es
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To evaluate the feasibility of an acupuncture protocol in the prevention of late diarrhea due to irinotecan in pediatric patients with solid tumors, a pre-post pilot study will be conducted. Pre-post pilot study non-randomized, open label, single arm study. There will be a single study group that will be used at the same time as your own control. The intervention will take place for approximately one year.


Description:

Pre-post pilot study non-randomized, open label, single arm study. The objective of this pilot study is to demonstrate that cancer acupuncture pediatric treatment is a safe and feasible treatment in the prevention of late-onset diarrhea related to with irinotecan. This pilot study will include patients between 0 and 18 years of age with a solid tumor (nephroblastoma, neuroblastoma, central nervous system tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma) receiving their first cycle of irinotecan, in our center, at 50 mg/m2/intravenous dose daily for five days (cumulative dose weekly = 250 mg/m2) and who do not receive concomitant abdominal radiotherapy. Acupuncture will be applied as a complementary treatment along with the usual regimen of prophylaxis and treatment of late diarrhea.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 21
Est. completion date December 31, 2022
Est. primary completion date September 30, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 0 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients from 0 to 18 years old with solid tumors who start treatment in our center with irinotecan at 50 mg/m2/intravenous dose in day hospital. - Blood tests prior to the start of the appropriate chemotherapy cycle to receive acupuncture with continuous stimulation needle insertion: neutrophils greater or equal to 1000 cells/mm3 and platelets greater than or equal to 50,000 cells/mm3. - Signature of informed consent by parents in the case of children under 12 years of age and assent of the minor. - Signature of informed consent in the case of those over 12 years of age Exclusion Criteria: - Participate in a clinical trial that is developed in the Pediatric Oncology Area of the Hospital Sant Joan de Deu where acupuncture intervention is not permitted. - Have received acupuncture treatment in the last ten days. - Receive concomitant abdominal radiotherapy. - Have diarrhea on day 1 of the cycle

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Acupuncture
13 Indwelling, sterile and disposable needles (SEIRIN NEW PYONEX® from 0.9 mm in length and 0.22 mm in diameter) on day 1 and 5 of the second cycle of irinotecan leaving them inserted for 4 days.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Hospital Sant Joan de Deu Esplugues De Llobregat Barcelona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain intensity during the procedure Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 1
Primary Pain intensity during the procedure Evaluation of pain intensity during the insertion procedure of the indwelling needles. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 5
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 1
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 2
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 3
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 4
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 5
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 6
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 7
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 8
Secondary Pain intensity during the intervention Evaluation of the intensity of the pain during the days that the indwelling needles remain inserted. It will be evaluated with the same tools as the variable major. The scales will be used: crying scale (0-8) (<3 years), Wong-Baker scale of faces for cooperative children (0-10) (>3 years) and numerical scale (0-10) for collaborating children (>6 years). Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 9
Secondary Side effects Registry of other local adverse effects of acupuncture. will be delivered families recorded some items on day 9 of the second cycle (intervention cycle): local infection, hematoma, and skin damage. Day 9
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 1
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 2
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 3
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 4
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 5
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 6
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 7
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 8
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 9
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 10
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 11
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 12
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 13
Secondary Degree of severity of diarrhea Degree of severity of diarrhea according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1-5). It will be evaluated after collection of data from the registration tables that families fill out. Higher scores mean a worse result.
Grade 1: Increase of <4 stools per day over baseline. Grade 2: Increase of 4 - 6 stools per day over baseline Grade 3: Increase of >=7 stools per day over baseline; hospitalization indicated Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5: Death
Day 14
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 1
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 2
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 3
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 4
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 5
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 6
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 7
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 8
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 9
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 10
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 11
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 12
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 13
Secondary Dose of antidiarrheal drugs Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of loperamide (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 14
Secondary Prophylactic regimen of cefixime Prophylactic regimen of cefixime before starting the cycle of irinotecan and the use of regimen prolonged 10 days. (Yes/No) Day 1
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 1
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 2
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 3
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 4
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 5
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 6
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 7
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 8
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 9
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 10
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 11
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 12
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 13
Secondary Abdominal pain treatment-related Degree of abdominal pain assessed with a visual analog scale of 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 14
Secondary Satisfaction degree Degree of satisfaction with acupuncture through a qualitative survey. Three items Yes/No and free comments Day 15
Secondary Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism Determination of the UGT1A1 polymorphism by blood sample in the analysis of routine performed on day 1 of the first cycle of irinotecan (control cycle). Day 1
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 1
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 2
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 3
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 4
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 5
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 6
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 7
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 8
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 9
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 10
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 11
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 12
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 13
Secondary Nausea Record whether or not the patient has nausea (YES/NO) Day 14
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 1
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 2
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 3
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 4
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 5
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 6
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 7
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 8
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 9
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 10
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 11
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 12
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 13
Secondary Vomiting Record whether or not the patient has vomiting (YES/NO) Day 14
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 1
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 2
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 3
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 4
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 5
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 6
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 7
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 8
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 9
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 10
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 11
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 12
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 13
Secondary Dose of antiemetic drugs (ondasentron) Dose of antidiarrheals: the number of daily doses of ondasentron (0-4 doses/day) will be recorded. Higher scores mean a worse result. Day 14
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05691608 - MoleculAr Profiling for Pediatric and Young Adult Cancer Treatment Stratification 2 N/A
Recruiting NCT05580991 - Intratumoral CAN1012(Selective TLR7 Agonist) in Subjects With Solid Tumors Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT02846038 - Understanding Communication in Healthcare to Achieve Trust (U-CHAT)
Recruiting NCT05159388 - A Study of PRS-344/S095012 (PD-L1x4-1BB Bispecific Antibody-Anticalin Fusion) in Patients With Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03181854 - Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Early Palliative Care N/A
Recruiting NCT06014502 - Study to Evaluate IMGS-001 Treatment in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05981703 - A Study Investigating BGB-26808 Alone or in Combination With Tislelizumab in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04107311 - Prospective Analysis of Intestinal Microbiome and Autoimmune Panels as Predictors of Toxicity in ImmunOncology Patients
Active, not recruiting NCT04078152 - Durvalumab Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study Phase 4
Completed NCT02250157 - A Dose-regimen Finding Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Activity of Oratecan in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05566574 - A Study of RP-3500 in Combination With Standard Radiation Therapy in People With Solid Tumor Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03943004 - Trial of DFP-14927 in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06036836 - Study of Favezelimab Coformulated With Pembrolizumab (MK-4280A) in Participants With Selected Solid Tumors (MK-4280A-010) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05798546 - Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors With Neo-T(GI-NeoT-02) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05525858 - KPMNG Study of MOlecular Profiling Guided Therapy Based on Genomic Alterations in Advanced Solid Tumors II
Terminated NCT04586335 - Study of CYH33 in Combination With Olaparib an Oral PARP Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT00479128 - Bortezomib With Gemcitabine/Doxorubicin in Patients With Urothelial Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04143789 - Evaluation of AP-002 in Patients With Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT04550663 - NKG2D CAR-T(KD-025) in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory NKG2DL+ Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT03980041 - Study to Evaluate the Efficacy/Safety of IPI-549 in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (MARIO-275) Phase 2