Gelatin Sponge VS PTFE Membrane for Socket Sealing After Immediate Implant

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Digital panoramas will be made to assess the implant sites. The included patients are assigned to their respective groups randomly. After implant submerging in the study group 2 layers of hemostatic resorbable gelatin sponge is fixed in the implant site; while with the control group PTFE is fixed. After 3 weeks the PTFE was removed while the gelatin sponge should be resorbed. 3 months later the implants are to be assessed for stability and a reverse torque test was used to confirm osseointegration during uncovering. Follow-up appointments at 1,3 weeks and 1,2 & 3 months were planned.

Clinical Trial Description

Dental implants are considered the gold standard for treatment of edentulous spaces. Immediate implant placement has multiple advantages including the shorter treatment span, less surgical procedures and faster loading possibility [1]. One of the drawbacks of immediate implant placement is proper soft tissue coverage of the submerged implant to prevent socket infection and allow implant stability and osseointegration [2]. To overcome these issues the use of membranes has been the standard procedure [3]. Polytetrafluoroethylene membranes (PTFE) have been reported vastly in literature and their results and clinical effect on soft tissue healing and guided tissue regeneration (GTR) around implants and in surgical sites. Dense PTFE allows for GTR by only promoting non-bacterial migration and improving cellular adhesion which promotes tissue regeneration underneath it [4]. On the other hand, PTFE membranes are quite expensive and with the economic crisis the world is facing the use of other less expensive options is crucial. Gelatin sponges are vastly used as hemostatic agents in minor surgical procedures and have shown excellent results in terms of hemostasis and rapid resorption [5]. The application of such material are multiple; such as with sinus lift procedures [6], microvascular decompression[7] and as a wound dressing [8]. The investigators hereby propose the use of hemostatic gelatin sponges as membranes for submerged immediate implants as a simpler and cheaper alternative to PTFE. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05982353
Study type	Interventional
Source	Cairo University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 1
Start date	June 1, 2022
Completion date	October 30, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04370314` - Retrospective Study on Clinical Performance of Screw-retained Implant Crowns	N/A
Completed	`NCT04620018` - Comparison of Three Antibiotic Protocols in Prevention of Infection in Dental Implant Surgery	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04073654` - SA Versus SOI Surfaces for Single Implant-supported Crown	N/A
Completed	`NCT05739461` - The Effect of Triangular Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05973357` - The Influence of Vertical Implant Position With Immediate Provisionalization on the Marginal Bone Loss.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06099834` - Evaluation of Osseointegration Process of Dental Implants	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06034067` - Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04983758` - 20-year Implant Survival in Periodontally Healthy and Compromised Patients
Completed	`NCT03641365` - Sleeves Versus Sleeveless Template	N/A
Completed	`NCT05724706` - An Evaluation of Salivary Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Completed	`NCT04270396` - Early and Late Implant Failure
Recruiting	`NCT06123221` - SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW	N/A
Completed	`NCT05060055` - Digital Assessment at Peri-implant Tissues After Immediate Implants With Customized Healing Abutments and Connective Tissue Grafts	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04429373` - Effect of Platelet-rich Plasm (PRF) on Two-implant Mandibular Overdenture: a Split Mouth	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03741036` - Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone	N/A
Completed	`NCT02625597` - Assessment of the Effects of Different Implant Abutment Occluding Materials on Dental Implant Health Parameters and Microbiology	N/A
Completed	`NCT03720236` - Peri-implant Tissues in BLX® Implants	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04518020` - Single Crown Supported by Short Implant Versus Standard Implant in Conjunction With Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation.	N/A
Completed	`NCT06294171` - Efficacy of Modified Piezosurgery Alveolar Bone Cut With Osseodensification Drills in Expanding Narrow Alveolar Bone	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03715439` - Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed in Preserved and Non-preserved Post-extraction Ridges

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Gelatin Sponge VS PTFE Membrane for Socket Sealing After Immediate Implant Placement

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms