View clinical trials related to Smoking Cessation.
Filter by:The prevalence of cigarette smoking has dropped to 10% in Hong Kong (HK) in 2017, however, smoking still kills 5700 persons per year. Studies suggest that abstinence rates are higher with combined NRT than single NRT, although local data on safety and benefits of combined NRT are lacking. This is a one-year, two-arm, parallel randomized trial in 20 HK public clinics. The aim is to compare the effectiveness of combined NRT with single NRT among HK Chinese. 560 chronic smokers, who smoked ≥10 cigarettes/day for ≥ 1 year, were randomized to either intervention or usual care. Intervention group received counseling and nicotine patch & gum. Usual care group received counselling and nicotine patch only. Primary outcome was smoking abstinence rate at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included smoking abstinence rate at 4, 12, & 26 weeks. Crude odds ratio (combined NRT vs. single NRT) and p-value were reported from logistic regression without adjustment; for trend analysis, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and p-value were reported from Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) (controlling for time). All AORs were adjusted for age, sex, baseline CO and clusters.
Prospective, observational open label, single center study enrolling up to 15 subjects to evaluate human factors and usability of the Pivot Breath Sensor.
This is a smoking cessation study that will enroll smokers who have been diagnosed with a severe mental illness. The study will use a combination of intensive tobacco treatment counseling and nicotine replacement therapy to assist smokers in cutting back on and quitting smoking over the course of six months.
This project aims to deliver an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention comprising the provision of brief cessation advice to smokers attending emergency departments and active referral to existing smoking cessation services. The objectives are as follows: 1. To promote this evidence-based project to emergency departments in various hospitals under the Hospital Authority 2. To construct a network with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to provide smoking cessation services 3. To train healthcare professionals to use the AWARD model to deliver brief cessation advice to smokers 4. To deliver brief cessation advice via healthcare professionals and actively refer smokers to existing smoking cessation services.
To examine the effects on participants who play the smokeSCREEN game in that the game will have positive changes in their attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, intentions, behaviors and other outcomes related to smoking and tobacco products.
This study tests an intervention for tobacco cessation (named B-EPIC) in an established community medication assisted treatment (MAT) clinic for pregnant and postpartum women with opioid dependence. Half of the participants will receive the intervention for tobacco cessation, which is standard cessation counseling from the provider plus additional cessation support from a Certified Tobacco Treatment Specialist (CTTS). The other half of participants will receive standard tobacco cessation from their provider. The project will also determine the economic impact of the B-EPIC intervention on healthcare expenditures.
Lung cancer suffers from large racial and socioeconomic disparities. Yet those at the highest risk of lung cancer death - current smokers, blacks, and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) and negative social determinants of health (SDH) - are less likely to receive preventive health services, including the two most effective interventions to reduce lung cancer mortality: tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). At Boston Medical Center (BMC) these preventive services are grossly underutilized, in part due to barriers our patients face in accessing these outpatient programs. Innovative approaches are needed to guide high-risk smokers to post-discharge early lung cancer detection services. The overarching goal of this study is to reduce disparities in lung cancer morbidity and mortality by using hospitalization at an urban safety net hospital as an opportunity to connect high-risk smokers to both LDCT lung cancer screening and tobacco dependence treatment. In addition to inpatient shared decision making [SDM] by an NP using a decision aid, screen-eligible smokers will also be connected with a community health worker (CHW) to facilitate access to outpatient smoking cessation counseling and LCS (CHW navigation).
This study aims to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of WhatsApp group discussion for smoking relapse prevention. To assess the effect due to treatment modality through the WhatsApp social group, the frequency and topics of the posts in each social group will be analysed and in each participant. The primary hypothesis is whether quitters who participate in the WhatsApp group discussion will have a higher prevalence of validated tobacco abstinence at 12-month follow-up than those who do not. The second hypothesis is that greater participation in the social groups, indicated by number of posts received, posted and/or viewed, was associated with higher likelihood to quit at 12-month. The third hypothesis is that the WhatsApp intervention for a recent quitter is a more cost-effective option for tobacco abstinence and prolonged survival when compared to the control group.
Improved strategies and scalable interventions to engage low-socioeconomic status (SES) smokers in tobacco treatment are needed. The investigators tested an intervention designed to connect low-SES smokers to treatment services, implemented through Minnesota's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (Sage) in 2017. Participants were female smokers from Sage (N=3,365). Using a factorial design, participants were randomized to six intervention groups consisting of a proactive call (no call vs call) and/or a financial incentive offered for being connected to treatment services (three levels of incentives). All individuals received direct mail and could opt for cessation support through Minnesota's population-based cessation services. The primary outcome was confirmed connection via phone to the free quit-line.
The study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to test two tailored conditions of an appearance-based intervention for smoking in female smokers, compared to a control group administered a general stop smoking intervention. The intervention delivery is being tested to assess whether the level of physiological arousal evoked by the intervention and the instruction type has an influence on the outcome measures. To do this one condition will receive the intervention with a neutral instruction and the other the intervention with additional instructions, measures of physiological stress reactivity will be used to measure level of stress evoked by the intervention and delivery.