Chronic Pain Rehabilitation in Patients With Small Fiber Neuropathy

Small Fiber Neuropathy Clinical Trial

Official title:

Chronic Pain Rehabilitation in Patients With Small Fiber Neuropathy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05798949
• Other study ID #: SFN-rehabilitation
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 9, 2023
• Est. completion date: October 2025

Study information

• Verified date: March 2023
• Source: Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
• Contact: A. Damci, MD
• Phone: 0031433876584
• Email: aysun.damci[@]mumc.nl
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a condition that is dominated by invalidating neuropathic pain. Pharmacological neuropathic pain treatment is often disappointing, since pain reduction is mostly slight and side effects can be debilitating. Although neuropathic pain is caused by a lesion of the somatosensory system, also psychological factors, such as fear and catastrophizing, appear to play a role in the origin and maintenance of disability in chronic pain. Rehabilitation based on pain education and cognitive behavioral treatment including elements of acceptance and commitment therapy, exposure in vivo or graded activity can be performed to influence these factors. To date no specific rehabilitation programs are available for patients diagnosed with SFN.

Description:

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) presents with neuropathic pain and autonomic dysfunction, caused by damage of the myelinated Aδ- and unmyelinated C-fibers. Neuropathic pain in SFN is chronic and severe. In 47% of the SFN cases, an underlying cause can be found. The diagnosis of SFN is established on the clinical signs and symptoms, in combination with reduced intra-epidermal nerve fiber density in the skin biopsy and/or abnormal quantitative sensory testing, with no abnormalities in the nerve conduction test (no large fiber involvement). Without underlying cause or when causative treatment is not sufficient, the treatment is focused on symptomatic neuropathic pain relief. Nevertheless, current pharmacological treatment is not sufficient enough in pain relief. In less than 50% of the pain patients, pain reduction of 30-40% has been observed with the most potent analgesia. Besides the lack of effectiveness of pharmacological medication, side effects and abuse are reported. These insufficient treatment options of SFN enables the necessity to search for other possible treatments.

In the treatment of (chronic) pain disability, a biopsychosocial approach seems to be effective in reducing disability and quality of life (QOL) in SFN. As we know based on earlier studies, chronic (neuropathic) pain, such as SFN, is influenced by several psychological factors, especially in causing and perpetuating pain. First, catastrophizing is one of those disabling psychological factors, which is defined as exaggerated negative mental set brought to bear during actual or anticipated pain experience Catastrophizing is seen as a precursor of pain, rather than consequence. Evidence showed a relation between the severity of chronic neuropathic pain and catastrophizing. Pain catastrophizing has been correlated to pain intensity, independent of physical impairment. In chronic pain, negative and catastrophic thoughts about illness often increase the level of disability. It seems that catastrophizing is one of the factors influencing QOL. Second, fear is another disabling psychological factor. Fear of pain can result in avoidance behavior and reduction of daily activities. Avoidance is the behavior aimed at postponing or preventing an aversive situation from occurring, which are mostly seen as a threat. According to the basic fear avoidance (conditioning) model, chronic pain and disability are induced by behavior. Neutral stimulus receives a negative load. In daily activities, these stimuli will remind patients to the painful experiences and so predicting pain. The intensity of pain combined with psychosocial factors can result in escape and avoidance behavior with eventually an impact for the level of physical activity.

These factors can be treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which aims to change the behavior, mindset, or feelings of the patient, helping to experience less distress, enjoying more and being more productive. Varying CBT modalities exists: exposure in vivo, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and graded activity (GA), which will be discussed. All the mentioned modalities will be provided by a treatment team consisting of a psychologist and an occupational therapist, whom both are experienced in the modalities of CBT. For every patient an individualized program will be designed based on the results of a screening. First, a patient will receive education about disabling factors that interfere with functioning in their personal situation. Thereafter, an individual treatment plan containing elements that specifically target disabling factors in the patient's situation will guide further treatment. Additional treatment elements can be based on three cognitive behavioral approaches: exposure in vivo, graded activity and acceptance commitment therapy (ACT). One or more modalities can be combined.

The main (primary) objective is to test the effectiveness of a personally tailored rehabilitation treatment targeting the specific psychological and behavioral factors related to decreasing disability, and improving QOL in SFN. The secondary objective is the personally tailored rehabilitation treatment program will have decrease of pain intensity, mood, and pain catastrophizing.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 10
• Est. completion date: October 2025
• Est. primary completion date: October 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Aged older than 18 years,

• Skin-biopsy proven idiopathic small fiber neuropathy (SFN),

• Main goal/purpose to achieve with rehabilitation therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Are not able to provide written informed consent,

• Have an underlying condition of SFN (diabetes, SCN (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha) 9A (subunit 9A) /10A (subunit 10A) /11A (subunit 11A) mutation, hypothyroidism, renal failure, vitamin B12 deficiency, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, alcohol abuses, malignancies, chemotherapeutic drugs),

• Have other neurological disease than SFN that may cause pain in the feet and/or damage to the somatosensory nervous system, are excluded,

• Have received any form of cognitive behavioral therapy within the last 6 months will be excluded from this study,

• Have insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Pain
• Small Fiber Neuropathy

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Chronic pain rehabilitation: exposure in vivo
Behavioral, chronic pain rehabilitation therapy
• Chronic pain rehabilitation: graded activity
Behavioral, chronic pain rehabilitation therapy
• Chronic pain rehabilitation: acceptance and commitment therapy
Behavioral, chronic pain rehabilitation therapy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Adelante Zorggroep	Maastricht	Limburg
Netherlands	Maastricht University Medical Center	Maastricht

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Disability measured with small fiber neuropathy rash built overall disability scale (SFN-RODS)	This is a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions, in which a higher score is indicating more disability. There is no cut-off point. The minimum score is 0. The maximum score is 100.	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Primary	Health related quality of life measured with short form 12 questionnaire (SF-12)	This is a questionnaire consisting of 8 items measuring the quality of life, in which a lower score is indicating a lower quality of life compared to healthy individuals. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 100.	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Pain intensity measured with numeric rating scale (NRS)	This is a measurement about the pain intensity. On a scale of 0-10 (Likert 11), a higher score is indicating more pain, in which 0 is indicating no pain at all (minimum score), and 10 is indicating the worst pain ever. (maximum score).	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Mood measured with hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)	HADS is a questionnaire measuring symptoms of anxiety and depression with 14 questions, consisting of 2 subscales (with each 7 items): a score between 0-7 is seen as normal, between 8-10 is seen as borderline, and a score higher than 11 indicates an underlying anxiety or depressive disorder. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 21.	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Pain catastrophizing measured with pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)	PCS is a questionnaire consisting of 13 questions, a higher score is indicating the presence of more catastrophic thoughts, there is no cut-off point. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 52.	Through study completion, an average of 1 year