View clinical trials related to Small Bowel Obstruction.
Filter by:Small bowel obstruction (SBO) occurs when the normal movements of the small bowel is obstructed, most commonly due to adhesion related to previous abdominal surgery. This may cause strangulation of the small bowel with reduced blood flow which is a surgical emergency requiring prompt treatment in the operating room. If there are no signs of strangulation or ischemia of the bowel at the time of diagnosis, international guidelines recommend initial treatment with intravenous fluids and nasogastric tube placement. However, there is emerging debate regarding non-selective treatment with nasogastric tube placement in patients with SBO. This management started around 1930 as a means to reduce pain in patients with SBO, in conjunction with other additions to management, like intravenous fluids. However the effect and utility of routine nasogastric tube placement have not been prospectively evaluated. There are a total of three retrospective observational studies in the past decade with a total of 759 patients where 292 (36%) were managed without a nasogastric tube. There was no difference in the rates of conservative treatment failure (requiring surgery), complications (vomiting, pneumonia) or mortality between patients receiving a nasogastric tube and those who didn't. However, the retrospective design of these studies limits their validity. Furthermore, nasogastric tube placement has been shown to be one of the more painful interventions patients may experience in-hospital. This calls into question the patient benefit of routine nasogastric tube placement in patients with SBO and further studies are needed to discern the utility of this intervention. Definitive treatment for SBO is surgical adhesiolysis but there is debate regarding the timing of surgery, particularly in older adults. A large proportion of patients may be managed conservatively with oral contrast and repeated radiological evaluation and the obstruction will resolve in many patients within 24 to 48 hours. This timeframe is dependent on factors related to the disease itself as well as patient related factors like previous surgery and comorbidities. Older patients are at high risk for complications but current available data is insufficient to inform practice in this population. Frailty, a state of increased vulnerability and susceptibility to adverse events, has been shown to be an independent prognosticator in older adults in the Emergency Department(ED) and suggested as a potential measure to risk stratify older adults with SBO. However to the authors knowledge there is no available data on frailty in older adults with SBO and only one prospective observational trial looking at older adults with SBO. Despite SBO being one of the most common surgical emergencies in older adults. To investigate the potential benefit of nasogastric tube placement in patients with SBO and the ability of frailty to prognosticate outcomes in older adults better evidence is needed.
This study will compare results of different intestinal decompression techniques in patients with small bowel obstruction.
For uncomplicated acute small bowel obstruction (aSBO), the "Bologna guidelines" recommend non-surgical management of 72 hours before considering surgery. This treatment is based on the placement of a nasogastric tube and the correction of hydro-electrolyte disorders. Non-surgical management is only effective in 60 to 70% and surgery is therefore necessary in 30 to 40% of cases after medical treatment for at least 3 days. This therefore leads to an increase in the length of hospital stay. Some authors also point out that postponing surgery for 3 days would aggravate the morbidity and mortality of surgery. Indeed, aSBO surgery has a complication rate of 10-40% and a mortality of up to 4%. There is a lack of studies evaluating what is the best management strategy for aSBO, especially with regard to the duration of medical treatment. Many recent studies plead in favor of early surgical treatment (<24 hours) which would reduce the morbidity and mortality rate of surgery but also the overall cost of treatment by reducing the length of stay. This paradigm shift is linked to the improvement of anesthetic and intensive care management over the last few years, but also to the advent of laparoscopy in emergency surgery. Indeed, laparoscopy could reduce the duration of hospitalization but also the operative morbidity and mortality. However, this surgical approach is not feasible in all situations and the conversion rate is reported in 30 to 76% of cases. One of the factors favoring the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach is the performance of early surgery. Another parameter favoring the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach is the aSBO mechanism: an aSBO on flange (SBA) is more likely to be treated effectively by laparoscopic than an aSBO on multiple adhesions (MA). In the literature, there is little to differentiate SBAs from MAs. Advances in CT scans have made it possible to describe the signs associated with the SBA mechanism and then to propose a score making it possible to predict the SBA mechanism with good performance (sensitivity 67.6%, specificity 84.6%). This score not only has the advantage of predicting the mechanism of the occlusion but it also makes it possible to predict the failure of non-surgical treatment if the score is ≥5.
This study will compare the results of 24 h conservative treatment and N h conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction (where N = 72 h minus duration of intestinal obstruction).
Patients hospitalized with adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) are randomized to 2 study groups at admission after signing an informed consent form. Water-soluble contrast media (CM) will be administered after 2 or after 24 hours of nasogastric- tube decompression.
People who undergo surgery, or develop intestinal obstruction will spend a period of time without normal bowel function. This might extend beyond the normal measures of passage of flatus or tolerance of diet. This study will take a three stage approach to develop a patient reported outcome measure for gastrointestinal recovery. Stage 1: Qualitative interviews with 20-40 patients who have undergone major abdominal surgery, or conservatively managed intestinal obstruction. These interviews will identify key themes and ideas to develop the questionnaire. Stage 2: Face validity testing of questionnaire with 20 patients, using the QQ-10 questionnaire to aid assessment. The questionnaire may be edited after this. Stage 3: 250-500 patients will be asked to complete the questionnaire following surgery or treatment for intestinal obstruction. Basic demographics will also be collated. Item reduction and scale refinement will be undertaken using this dataset. This will provide a PROM of gastrointestinal recovery which is ready for validation.
Adhesion-related small bowel obstruction is a common digestive emergency that can be managed either conservatively or surgically. However, the choice between these two approaches can be difficult due to the absence of specific signs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical impact of a procalcitonin-based algorithm.
This study will compare the results of early surgery after 12 h conservative treatment and 48 h conservative treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction.
This study will evaluate the use of RightBio Metrics' RightSpot device used to determine if there is proper placement of a nasogastric or orogastric tube.