Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Guided Imagery and Virtual Reality (VR) Technology on Patient and Parent Coping and Resource Utilization During Unsedated Procedures
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Medical College of Wisconsin |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Children with acute and chronic illness undergo frequent, painful, and distressing procedures. This randomized control trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of guided imagery (GI) vs virtual reality (VR) on the procedural pain and state anxiety of children and young adults undergoing un-sedated procedures. We explored the role of trait anxiety and pain catastrophizing in intervention response.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 67 |
Est. completion date | April 29, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | April 29, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 8 Years to 25 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Individuals being seen by the hematology, oncology, and blood and marrow transplant services. - English-speaking patients between the ages of 8-25 years that are at least one month post-diagnosis. - Has one of the three qualifying procedures: port access, dressing changes, and IV sticks. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients having identified physical impairments (e.g., blindness, active infection of the skin, history of seizure disorder) that would prevent them from using VR equipment. - Patients with significant developmental delays that would prevent them from completing required study forms. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Children's Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin |
United States | Medical College of Wisconsin | Wauwatosa | Wisconsin |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medical College of Wisconsin | Northwestern Mutual Foundation |
United States,
Asl Aminabadi N, Erfanparast L, Sohrabi A, Ghertasi Oskouei S, Naghili A. The Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety during Dental Treatment in 4-6 Year-Old Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Fall;6(4):117-24. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.025. Epub 2012 Nov 12. — View Citation
Blount, R.L., Zempsky, W.T., Jaaniste, T., Evans, S., Cohen, L.L., Devine, K.A., & Zeltzer, L.K. (2009). Management of pediatric pain and distress due to medical procedures. In M.C. Roberts & R.G. Steele (Eds.), Handbook of Pediatric Psychology (pp. 171-188), New York: The Guilford Press.
Dahlquist LM, McKenna KD, Jones KK, Dillinger L, Weiss KE, Ackerman CS. Active and passive distraction using a head-mounted display helmet: effects on cold pressor pain in children. Health Psychol. 2007 Nov;26(6):794-801. — View Citation
Das DA, Grimmer KA, Sparnon AL, McRae SE, Thomas BH. The efficacy of playing a virtual reality game in modulating pain for children with acute burn injuries: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN87413556]. BMC Pediatr. 2005 Mar 3;5(1):1. — View Citation
Deraney J, Davis M, Evers HB, German K, Hamill JC, Karas-Irwin BS, Mazzer MC, Shaw RE. Drumming Effect on Anxiety. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Oct;31(5):528-529. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 13. — View Citation
Gershon J, Zimand E, Lemos R, Rothbaum BO, Hodges L. Use of virtual reality as a distractor for painful procedures in a patient with pediatric cancer: a case study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Dec;6(6):657-61. — View Citation
Gershon J, Zimand E, Pickering M, Rothbaum BO, Hodges L. A pilot and feasibility study of virtual reality as a distraction for children with cancer. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;43(10):1243-9. — View Citation
Gold, J. I., Kant, A. J., & Kim, S. H. (2005, December). Virtual anesthesia: the use of virtual reality for pain distraction during acute medical interventions. In Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain (Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 203-210). WB Saunders.
Hoffman HG, Doctor JN, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ, Furness TA 3rd. Virtual reality as an adjunctive pain control during burn wound care in adolescent patients. Pain. 2000 Mar;85(1-2):305-9. — View Citation
Jeffs D, Dorman D, Brown S, Files A, Graves T, Kirk E, Meredith-Neve S, Sanders J, White B, Swearingen CJ. Effect of virtual reality on adolescent pain during burn wound care. J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):395-408. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000019. — View Citation
Kazak AE, Penati B, Brophy P, Himelstein B. Pharmacologic and psychologic interventions for procedural pain. Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):59-66. — View Citation
Koller D, Goldman RD. Distraction techniques for children undergoing procedures: a critical review of pediatric research. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012 Dec;27(6):652-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Oct 13. Review. — View Citation
Malloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13. Review. — View Citation
Mosadeghi S, Reid MW, Martinez B, Rosen BT, Spiegel BM. Feasibility of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention for Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 27;3(2):e28. doi: 10.2196/mental.5801. — View Citation
Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E, Enskär K. The use of Virtual Reality for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents in a paediatric oncology unit. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Apr;13(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Feb 20. — View Citation
Powers SW. Empirically supported treatments in pediatric psychology: procedure-related pain. J Pediatr Psychol. 1999 Apr;24(2):131-45. Review. — View Citation
Sander Wint S, Eshelman D, Steele J, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction using virtual reality glasses during lumbar punctures in adolescents with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Jan-Feb;29(1):E8-E15. — View Citation
Schneider SM, Prince-Paul M, Allen MJ, Silverman P, Talaba D. Virtual reality as a distraction intervention for women receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Jan-Feb;31(1):81-8. — View Citation
Schneider SM, Workman ML. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(2):125-34. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125. — View Citation
Sharar SR, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR. Factors influencing the efficacy of virtual reality distraction analgesia during postburn physical therapy: preliminary results from 3 ongoing studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S43-9. — View Citation
Tashjian VC, Mosadeghi S, Howard AR, Lopez M, Dupuy T, Reid M, Martinez B, Ahmed S, Dailey F, Robbins K, Rosen B, Fuller G, Danovitch I, IsHak W, Spiegel B. Virtual Reality for Management of Pain in Hospitalized Patients: Results of a Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Mar 29;4(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/mental.7387. — View Citation
Uman LS, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Kisely S. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: an abbreviated cochrane review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Sep;33(8):842-54. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn031. Epub 2008 Apr 2. Review. — View Citation
Windich-Biermeier A, Sjoberg I, Dale JC, Eshelman D, Guzzetta CE. Effects of distraction on pain, fear, and distress during venous port access and venipuncture in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-19. — View Citation
Wismeijer AA, Vingerhoets AJ. The use of virtual reality and audiovisual eyeglass systems as adjunct analgesic techniques: a review of the literature. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Dec;30(3):268-78. Review. — View Citation
Wolitzky, K., Fivush, R., Zimand, E., Hodges, L., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2005). Effectiveness of virtual reality distraction during a painful medical procedure in pediatric oncology patients. Psychology and health, 20(6), 817-824.
Zernikow B, Meyerhoff U, Michel E, Wiesel T, Hasan C, Janssen G, Kuhn N, Kontny U, Fengler R, Görtitz I, Andler W. Pain in pediatric oncology--children's and parents' perspectives. Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):395-406. — View Citation
* Note: There are 26 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient pain via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS) to identify subgroups that may respond better to one intervention over another. Patient perceptions of pain will be assessed prior to the first procedure using either the child (for patients 8-16 years) or adult (for patients 17+ years) version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-question survey which assesses thoughts and feelings related to pain on a 5 point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely." | The PCS will be completed by the patient 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention (i.e., at baseline). | |
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient pain via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This measure is used to assess pain and distress across 6 domains: (1) highest level of pain, (2) average amount of pain, (3) anxiety about pain, (4) unpleasantness of pain, (5) bothersomeness of pain, and (6) time spent thinking about pain. Scores range from 0-100 on each item. | The VAS will be completed by the patient within 10 minutes after completion of each intervention (i.e., GI and VR intervention). | |
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient pain via Children's Emotional Manifestation of Pain Scale (CEMS) | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Children's Emotional Manifestation of Pain (CEMS). This observational measure offers an objective way to measure distress during difficult medical experiences. It includes the following domains: anxiety score, facial expression, vocalization, activity, interaction, and level of cooperation. | The CEMS will be completed by study staff during each intervention. Study staff will assess the patients through the duration of the procedure and intervention that same day. | |
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait (STAI-T) | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) to identify subgroups that may respond better to one intervention over another. This measure is used to assess a patient's trait (underlying or baseline) anxiety. There is a child portion for patients 8-16 years or an adult portion for patients 17+ years. | The STAI-T will be completed by the patient 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention (i.e., at baseline). | |
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via STAI-State Pre-Intervention | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the STAI-State. This assessment is used to assess a patient's state (in the moment) anxiety. There is only one version for all ages. | STAI-State will be completed 10 minutes prior to the first and second procedure (GI and VR). | |
Primary | GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via STAI-State Post-Intervention | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the STAI-State. This assessment is used to assess a patient's state (in the moment) anxiety. There is only one version for all ages. | STAI-State will be completed 10 minutes after the first and second intervention (GI and VR). | |
Secondary | GI vs. VR in parent distress via PCS-P | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Parents (PCS-P). The PCS-P is a caregiver perspective, that consists of a 13-question survey that assesses thoughts and feelings related to children's pain on a 5 point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely." | The PCS-P will be completed by the caregiver 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention. | |
Secondary | GI vs. VR in parent distress via Emotional Adjective Survey | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Emotion Adjective Survey. The Emotion Adjective Survey is a measure of caregiver distress that asks for a rating of distress across four emotional experiences (worried, upset, anxious, sad). | The Emotion Adjective Survey will be completed by the caregiver 10 minutes after each intervention. | |
Secondary | GI vs VR in hospital resource utilization via Staff Time | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to Staff Time. This tracking log keeps track of the total number and time (minutes) that nursing staff spend in the patient room during each procedure. | The Staff Time log is completed by a member of the study team. It begins once the nursing staff member opens the sterile kit used for the current procedure and ends when the procedure is completed after each intervention. | |
Secondary | GI vs VR in hospital resource utilization via Procedure Time | GI will be compared to VR when it comes to Procedure Time. This tracking log keeps track of the total time that it takes nursing to complete the procedure. | The Procedure Time log is completed by a member of the study team. The time begins once the nursing staff member opens the sterile kit used for the current procedure and ends when the procedure is completed/ | |
Secondary | Nurse Feasibility and Acceptability | Nurses will complete a brief measure assessing feasibility, acceptability, and expectations for success. | The Nurse Feasibility and Acceptability survey will be completed within one day following completion of each intervention. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02227472 -
Working Memory and School Readiness in Preschool-Aged Children With Sickle Cell Disease
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06301893 -
Uganda Sickle Surveillance Study (US-3)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04398628 -
ATHN Transcends: A Natural History Study of Non-Neoplastic Hematologic Disorders
|
||
Completed |
NCT02522104 -
Evaluation of the Impact of Renal Function on the Pharmacokinetics of SIKLOS ® (DARH)
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04688411 -
An mHealth Strategy to Improve Medication Adherence in Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03615924 -
Effect of Ticagrelor vs. Placebo in the Reduction of Vaso-occlusive Crises in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06300723 -
Clinical Study of BRL-101 in Severe SCD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03937817 -
Collection of Human Biospecimens for Basic and Clinical Research Into Globin Variants
|
||
Completed |
NCT04917783 -
Health Literacy - Neurocognitive Screening in Pediatric SCD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04134299 -
To Assess Safety, Tolerability and Physiological Effects on Structure and Function of AXA4010 in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02580565 -
Prevalence of Problematic Use of Equimolar Mixture of Oxygen and Nitrous Oxide and Analgesics in the Sickle-cell Disease
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04754711 -
Interest of Nutritional Care of Children With Sickle Cell Disease on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04388241 -
Preliminary Feasibility and Efficacy of Behavioral Intervention to Reduce Pain-Related Disability in Pediatric SCD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05431088 -
A Phase 2/3 Study in Adult and Pediatric Participants With SCD
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01158794 -
Genes Influencing Iron Overload State
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03027258 -
Point-of-Delivery Prenatal Test Results Through mHealth to Improve Birth Outcome
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02960503 -
Macrolide Therapy to Improve Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02565082 -
Evaluation of the Hemostatic Potential in Sickle Cell Disease Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02620488 -
A Brief Laboratory-Based Hypnosis Session for Pain in Sickle Cell Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02567695 -
A Single-Dose Relative Bioavailability Study Of GBT440 300 mg Capsules in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 |