View clinical trials related to Sick Sinus Syndrome.
Filter by:This is a multicenter prospective randomized blind controlled trial with a sham procedure group of the efficacy and safety of cardioneuroablation as a method of treating symptomatic bradycardia without a permanent pacemaker implantation
This is a prospective clinical observation and registration study. The investigator aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac denervation ablation as a treatment strategy for severe sinus bradycardia.
The purpose of this registry is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LBBA pacing/sensing in patients already implanted with the Tendril STS 2088 lead.
The goal of this observational study is to improve quality of life in sinus node dysfunction patients by utilizing allometric lower rate pacing (or called personalized lower rate, PLR) in standard commercially available dual-chamber pacemakers. The primary objective is to achieve a significant improvement in patients' quality of life with use of PLR pacing in comparison with the control group with nominal lower rate in patients with implanted dual-chamber pacemaker. The secondary objectives are to assess cardiac functional changes in echocardiography of ventricular mechanical performance with a PLR pacing in comparison with the control group with nominal lower rate, and to assess the viability of using elevated blood pressure as a marker for undetected bradycardia and providing allometric rate to correct bradycardia-related increase in arterial systolic blood pressure.
With the aging of society, the use of cardiac pacing in patients with irreversible bradycardia is increasingly widespread. As early as the 1950s, right ventricular pacing (RVP) began to be used in patients with atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, but in fact such pacing could cause ventricular asynchrony, which could lead to long-term myocardial perfusion injury, valvular regurgitation, heart failure, and increased risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The latest guideline recommended reducing the proportion of right ventricular pacing. Additionally, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) has been recommended to improve cardiac function, but only about 30% of patients benefit from it, which may be related to poor left ventricular pacing site and myocardial scarring. In theory, His bundle pacing (HBP) compared with RVP can reduce the risk of functional tricuspid regurgitation when the lead position lies on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve, which may improve the right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure. In 2021, Domenico Grieco et al. explored the effect of HBP on right heart function. After 6 months of follow-up, it was found that HBP improved right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure compared with RVP. At present, there are few discussions on the effect of physiological pacing on right ventricular hemodynamics, and the sample size is small. Internationally, the discussion of the assessment of hemodynamics is limited to non-invasive evaluation (such as echocardiography, ECG, SPECT) The gold standard for right heart hemodynamics evaluation is the measurement of invasive right heart catheterization, and there has been no relevant research so far, so the investigators further designed a study of the effect of physiological pacing on hemodynamics.
A multicenter, prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation to evaluate the superiority of physiological ventricular pacing (proposed modality) vs. managed ventricular pacing (control) for prevention of persistent AF (PeAF) occurrence in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR≥180 ms) and indication for pacing: sinus node disease and/or paroxysmal type 1 or 2-second degree AV block.
This is a noncommercial, physician-initiated, monitored, multicenter, prospective randomized clinical trial, a proof-of-concept study, investigating a treatment strategy only. The study will use medical products applied for invasive and nonivasive procedures performed at the participating centers.
Endocardial ganglion plexus ablation (cardioneuroablation) represents a promising therapeutic technique for the treatment of vasovagal syncope (VV), functional atrioventricular block (AVB) and sinus node dysfunction (SND) with a component of vagal hypertonia. Nevertheless, there is currently a paucity of literature about the results according to the type of presentation (VV, AVB or SND). The investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of cardioneuroablation for the treatment of symptomatic SND.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled study. By comparing patients with sinus bradycardia undergoing cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation and pacemaker therapy, and long-term follow-up to evaluate its safety and effectiveness after surgery, in order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation in the treatment of sinus bradycardia.
Taiwan Registry for Leadless Pacemaker is a nationwide registry for leadless pacemaker performance in Taiwan.