View clinical trials related to Shock, Septic.
Filter by:Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an independent risk factor for death that affects 10-15% of hospitalized patients and more than 50% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Sepsis is the most frequent cause of AKI, affecting 48 million people worldwide every year, and accounting for approximately 11 million of annual global deaths. Despite these figures, there are no known therapies to prevent or reverse septic AKI; hence this study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of the implementation of metformin in the treatment of AKI in patients with sepsis. This study is the first critical step to inform the design of a future, full-scale efficacy randomized clinical trial.
Antimicrobial and supportive therapeutic interventions in patients with septic shock are usually effective - procalcitonin and interleukin-6 levels fall rapidly in most cases, and noradrenaline support can be discontinued within a few days. Unfortunately, only in a small portion of patients, do the organ functions improve at the same time, and in most of them, multi-organ failure persists. Therefore, it is likely that, in addition to infection and the response to infection, other mechanisms are also involved in the persistence of organ failure in patients after septic shock.
This controlled before-and-after study analyse the impact of thiamine supplementation on outcomes of patients with septic shock treated according to the surviving sepsis campaign 2021 guidelines
Sedation and analgesia in patients with sepsis and hemodynamic instability may be challenging in the ICU. Opioids and propofol can further exacerbate tissue infusion in septic shock by reducing cardiac contractility, increasing vasodilation, and reducing respiratory drive. Ketamine is an NMDA receptor antagonist, which has no effect on respiratory drive and has diastolic airway smooth muscle and anti-inflammatory properties. Esketamine is a dextrorotatory cleavage twice as potent and reduces the incidence of dose-dependent side effects of ketamine. Although it has been successfully used in burn patients undergoing multiple operations and anesthesia-related maintenance analgesia, it has not been reported in ICU septic shock patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to explore the use of esketamine in mechanically ventilated ICU septic shock patients in a single-center randomized controlled trial.
The sudy objective is to evaluate the cerebral haemodynamic status in different ranges of systemic arterial pressure in patients with septic shock by noninvasive tools, transcranial doppler and intracranial compliance by mechanical sensor (B4C). Patients participating in the study will be submitted to different levels of arterial pressure, titrated with vasopressor and them their cerebral hemodynamic variables will be evaluated,
This trial will be a randomized controlled single-center pilot trial comparing the use of angiotensin II versus standard-of-care (SOC) vasopressor therapy in adult patients with persistent vasodilatory shock despite moderate-dose norepinephrine, with a primary outcome of the ability of novel biomarkers (renin and DPP3) to predict blood pressure response to angiotensin II. Given our angiotensin II will be compared to SOC, this will be an unblinded study.
Septic shock is one of the causes of death in ICU and hospital. Refractory shock is the problem which healthcare providers should recognize though it is difficult to handle with. The corticosteroid called hydrocortisone is one of the treatment in refractory septic shock which requires vasopressor to maintain blood pressure. In recovery phase of septic shock and weaning off vasopressor, there is no definite way to taper off hydrocortisone.
The aim of study is this to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous linezolid infusion versus the standard regimen in treating critically ill patients with septic shock in the ICU
Assessing the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use of midodrine as a vasopressor in septic shock patients by measuring the difference in the mortality rates between control and intervention groups.
Previous studies of our team reported the improvement of myocardial contractility both on hemodynamic parameters (by transpulmonary thermodilution) and morphological (by transthoracic echocardiography: TTE), during the early phase of septic shock (during the first 4 hours management of septic shock). However, one can wonder about the effect of NAD on myocardial cardiac ouput and contractility beyond the early phase of septic shock, more precisely beyond the first 24 hours. Indeed, while it continues to act on the "stressed" blood volume and the diastolic left ventricular perfusion by increasing the diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), it has been reported in old studies that beyond the early phase, the sensitivity of the β1-adrenergic receptors is altered due to the phenomenon of internalization of these receptors, leading to a reduction of the myocardial response to catecholamines. The investigators can then wonder whether norepinephrine still exerts a positive effect on myocardial contractility via the increase in DAP, despite an alteration of the β1-adrenergic pathway. To answer this question, the investigators proposed to evaluate the effects of norepinephrine by TTE on cardiac contractility after the initial phase.