View clinical trials related to Shock, Septic.
Filter by:The norepinephrine and vasopressin for rescue versus early vasopressin for vasopressor dependent sepsis (NoVa) is a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing an early vasopressin initiation strategy versus norepinephrine plus vasopressin initiation only as a rescue strategy for hemodynamic management of critically ill patients with vasopressor dependent sepsis.
Septic shock is the last and most severe stage of sepsis and is defined by extremely low blood pressure, despite lots of intravenous fluids. The incidence of septic shock related cardiomyopathy was 10% to 70%. Besides, general anesthesia will inhibit the sympathetic nervous system, reduce myocardial contractility and aggravate cardiac dysfunction. No randomized controlled trials have yet explore the effects of dobutamine on clinical outcomes for patients with septic shock undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about blood pressure response to the vasopressor drug vasopressin in people with septic shock. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Are the levels of molecules showing communication between cells different between people whose blood pressure improves and people whose blood pressure does not improve when given a vasopressor medication? - Are measurements found on echocardiography (heart ultrasound) different between people whose blood pressure improves and people whose blood pressure does not improve when given a vasopressor medication? Participants will be asked to contribute one or two blood samples. Participants who are ordered the drug vasopressin will contribute two blood samples. Both samples will be about two tablespoons for a total of about four tablespoons. One sample will be drawn before starting vasopressin infusion and the second sample will be drawn between one and six hours after starting the vasopressor drug infusion. At the same time points, advanced echocardiography pictures will be taken. Participants who are not ordered the drug vasopressin and only ordered the drug norepinephrine will contribute only one sample. At the time the sample is collected, advanced echocardiography pictures will be taken. This research also involves analyzing data obtained during the participant's hospital stay.
The purpose of the trial is to test if a strategy of resuscitation guided by capillary refill time and individualised clinical hemodynamic phenotyping can improve important clinical outcomes within 28 days in septic shock patients compared to usual care.
Preterm infants (born at less than 37 weeks of pregnancy) sometimes develop a serious blood infection leading to low blood pressure, which does not respond to saline or to the standard medicines for increasing blood pressure, such as dopamine and epinephrine. The goal of this research study is to compare the effect of giving an injectable medicine called Methylene blue (MB) versus not giving MB to such preterm infants who are unresponsive to standard treatment. The main questions that this study aims to answer is: 1. Whether MB treatment reduces death to any cause as compared to no MB treatment. 2. Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to achieve normal blood pressure 3. Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to stoppage of all blood pressure medications, steroids and normal saline. 4. Whether treatment with MB improves heart function as measured by echocardiography at 24 and 48 hours.
Rudiger and Singer suggested strategies for refining adrenergic stress (decatecholaminization). They proposed the use of dexmedetomidine and vasopressin to reduce the catecholamine load during sepsis. The investigators will use vasopressin as the primary vasopressor and a heart rate-calibrated dexmedetomidine infusion in septic shock patients. The investigators of the current study will use DEXPRESSIN in septic shock patients to investigate the effects of decatecholaminization on in-hospital mortality.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to restore immune function by selectively removing three mediators largely contributing to sepsis-induced immunosuppression from extracorporeal circulation.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of septic shock and together these conditions carry a high mortality risk. In septic patients who develop severe AKI renal cortical perfusion is deficient despite normal macrovascular organ blood flow. This intra-renal perfusion abnormality may be amenable to pharmacological manipulation, which may offer mechanistic insight into the pathophysiology of septic AKI. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II on renal microcirculatory perfusion in a cohort of patients with septic shock.
It is well recognized the association between fluid volume administered and positive fluid balance with adverse outcomes . Active fluid removal is widely practiced in an attempt to mitigate this potential damage. However, it is not clear which is the best approach for the post-resuscitation phase in critically ill patients. In this context, Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) through Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) would allow the assessment of the degree of venous congestion, through the visualization of vascular anatomy and blood velocity using Doppler, being potentially useful to guide fluid removal. The investigators will evaluate whether fluid management after the initial phase of VExUS-guided resuscitation is able to improve outcomes compared to usual therapy in patients with septic shock. This is a single center, prospective, open and randomized clinical study in which patients admitted to intensive care will be included after the first 24 hours of resuscitation. A total of 200 patients will be randomized either to volume management guided by VExUS or to the standard therapy arm as per usual practice.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two timings of steroid treatment in patients with severe infection who develop low blood pressure. The main question it aims to answer is: • Which timing strategy is better between starting steroid treatment very early in the course of severe infection, or waiting until the patient does not respond to medicine that raises blood pressure according to the current guidelines? Participants will receive either early steroid treatment or placebo right after they develop low blood pressure from infection. Both participants and treating doctors will not know which treatment participants received. When blood pressure goal is not reached after a moderate dose of drugs that raise blood pressure, an open-label steroid treatment will be given to participants as indicated in the current guidelines.