View clinical trials related to Shock, Septic.
Filter by:Pharmacokinetics and disposition of XueBiJing compounds in patients with sepsis
Inaccurate monitoring of mean arterial pressure (MAP) could lead to improper treatment in the form of excessive fluid infusion or unnecessary vasopressor therapy; therefore, accurate hemodynamic monitoring is crucial in treatment of septic shock. In critically ill septic patients treated with vasoactive drugs, many studies reported that radial arterial pressure monitoring significantly underestimates central arterial pressure. Insertion of a femoral line allowed a substantial reduction of the infusion rate of vasoactive drugs in these patients. These findings might imply that femoral placement of arterial lines is the gold standard for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring in shock patient. Our study aimed to determine the difference between radial (peripheral) and femoral (central) arterial pressures measured simultaneously in a group of critically ill patients receiving high dose noradrenaline therapy (≥ 0.1 mcg/kg/min).
Many observational studies have highlighted an independent association between fluid overload and clinical outcomes during septic shock. To optimize fluid balance, clinician has several options to consider carefully fluid administration and avoid fluid overload. More than a general restrictive approach, a pragmatic, individual tailored approach should be considered to optimize patients' hemodynamics during acute circulatory failure. Many advances in hemodynamic monitoring were described. Mini-fluid challenge appears to be a sensible method to use for bedside assessment to optimize fluid infusion. The next step for hemodynamic management in the ICU should be to test a hemodynamic goal-directed approach to better control fluid management and eventually improve patient's outcome. The main objective of the GOAL study is to evaluate a pragmatic optimization fluid management protocol tailored to each patient's hemodynamic status based on mini-fluid challenges. This intervention will be compared to usual management based on the latest guidelines. This intervention aims to decrease organ dysfunction during septic shock. This is the first large clinical trial designed to test this hypothesis.
Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening event due to a dysregulated immune response to an host. Blood purification techniques may be considered as a therapeutic weapon to front sepsis and septic shock. Haemoadsorption is one of the known blood purification technique that is employed in this study, and it is based on the principle that whole blood, contacting the surface of proper designed sorbent, would be cleared of certain substrates. With haemoadsorption it is possible to de-circulate from bloodstream high molecular weight substances, such as cytokines.In this study Cytosorb® cartridge, based on haemoadsorption principle is applied on septic patients, suffering for acute kidney failure, along with continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (CVVH-D).Microcirculation has a crucial role in the natural history of sepsis. In this prospective observational non interventional study, 10 septic patients with an acute kidney failure that need CVVH are enrolled. The primary endpoint of the study is to verify an improvement in the density of microcirculatory vessels and in the quality of blood flow after exposure to Cytosorb®. These two parameters are well described synthetically by the Perfused Vessel Density (PVD). As secondary endpoints we also want to analyze the modification of microcirculation after haemoadsorption therapy: microvascular blood flow, described by the microvascular flow index (MFI) and peripheral tissue oxygen perfusion during Cytosorb® exposure using near infrared spectroscopy technique (NIRS)
Sepsis is a severe disease with a high mortality rate and lack of efficacious therapies. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are drugs widely used to inhibit acid secretion by gastric cells and with a high safety profile. Carta and Rubartelli (IRCCS San Martino - Genova) have recently reported that PPI, such as esomeprazole, inhibit TNF-alfa and IL-1ß secretion. Moreover, they showed that a single administration of PPI protects mice from endotoxic shock with no adverse effects. PPI-SEPSIS is a randomized, double blind, controlled against placebo clinical trial to test if high-doses esomeprazole in septic patients reduces the severity of organs failure. In parallel, the investigators will evaluate ex vivo in monocytes from septic patients: redox state and response to inflammatory stimuli; ATP release; metabolic changes and pH; cytokine production; the effects of PPI on these parameters.
The objective of this study is to survey the type and the amount of non-resuscitation fluids that patients with septic shock receives during their first 5 days of ICU admission.
In this study, we aim to determine whether the combination of Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Thiamine (Vitamin B1), and Corticosteroids improves the trajectory of organ failure and reduces mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock as compared to placebo.
Sepsis remains a major challenge, even in modern intensive care medicine. The identification of the causative pathogen is crucial for an early optimization of the antimicrobial treatment regime in patients with sepsis. In this context, culture-based diagnostic procedures (e.g. blood cultures) represent the standard of care, although they are associated with relevant limitations. Therefore, culture independent methods (e.g. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)) seem to be an attractive alternative. By the identification of circulating cell-free DNA in the blood and the use of the quantitative sepsis indicating quantifier (SIQ) score, causing pathogens can be identified and potential contaminations can be excluded. The goal of the presented study is therefore, to assess the diagnostic performance of a NGS-based approach for the detection of relevant infecting organisms in a big cohort of septic patients (n=500). Moreover, the plausibility of this NGS-based approach will be estimated by a panel of independent clinical specialists, retrospectively identifying potential changes in patients´ management based on NGS results.
Sepsis and septic shock patients are considered to have a high risk of complications and death. Appropriate antimicrobial therapy plays an important role in determining outcomes in septic patients. However, pathophysiologic changes associated with critical illness have an impact on pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials. In addition, increasing bacterial resistance is also a growing concern, especially in intensive care units., Consequently, standard antimicrobial dose may not be sufficient to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target in sepsis and septic shock patients. The purpose of this study is to compare a therapy between meropenem standard dose and meropenem high dose in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock
The objective of this pilot study is to assess overall feasibility prior to embarking on a larger randomized pragmatic trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of fluid resuscitation with NS versus LR for pediatric patients with suspected septic shock. Necessary feasibility assessments include ensuring appropriate compliance with study fluid in each of the two arms, effectiveness of study enrollment using a pragmatic study design embedded within routine clinical practice, and acceptability of using Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC).