View clinical trials related to Shock, Cardiogenic.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to monitor hemodynamic differences between central veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) and peripheral VA ECMO. The main question it aims to answer is: - Efficacy of the different cannulation strategies for the establishment of for VA-ECMO circulation on hemodynamics and organ perfusion. Participants require VA ECMO support, will be divided into two groups in an intention-to-treat analysis: central artery cannulation and peripheral artery cannulation. Researchers will analyze different cannulation strategies for VA-ECMO and identify potential advantages and disadvantages for two groups of VA-ECMO.
Aim 1: Prospective, observational analysis of the association between echocardiographic measures of cardiac function and left ventricular unloading on VA ECMO. Aim 2: Prospective, observational analysis of the association between clinical laboratory biomarkers and left ventricular unloading on VA ECMO.
Data regarding the safety and efficacy of ivabradine use in severely decompensated HFrEF requiring inotropic support is limited to case series.1 This study aimed to evaluate ivabradine safety and tolerability in admitted cardiogenic shock patients who started on dobutamine infusion for inotropic support.
Prospective, multi-center, randomized (1:1), controlled trial of Impella for active left ventricular unloading on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation vs. veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.
The study aims to investigate clinically and prognostically relevant parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock within a monocentric observational clinical register.
This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to identify whether immediate multi-vessel PCI would be better in clinical outcomes compared with culprit lesion-only PCI for AMI and multi-vessel disease with an advanced form of CS patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).
The purpose of this study is to assess whether hemodynamic support with an Impella-based treatment strategy initiated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)-Cardiogenic Shock (CS) improves survival and functional outcomes compared to a non-Impella-based treatment strategy.
The primary objective of the PACCS trial is to assess if early invasive hemodynamic assessment and ongoing management with a PAC in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acutely decompensated heart failure (AHDF-CS) is associated with lower in-hospital mortality risk compared to the current standard of care with no or delayed PAC assessment.
LSCSI is a Hub&Spoke project with the main aim to improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock in Lower Silesia region, Poland. It consists of one "hub" which is Wroclaw University Hospital and eleven "spokes" which are eleven cardiology departments situated in Lower Silesian Voivodeship. The consortium have unified protocol defining which cardiogenic shock patient and when should be transferred to the "hub" for enhanced treatment options including durable mechanical circulatory support or heart transplant. The "hub" have 7/24 Shock Team on-site supplied with a protocol how to proceed with "spoke" transferred patients including decision making on which mechanical circulatory support implant with subsequent de-escalation or escalation pathway.
A Clinical Events Committee (CEC) will include Cardiac Surgery Professor and chief of cardiac surgery Rose Kelly MD, Professor of Medicine Ganesh Raveendran MD at the University of Minnesota who is the direction of Interventional Cardiology and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota David Benditt. They will review and adjudicate serious and unexpected adverse events independently from the PI and co investigators.