View clinical trials related to Shared Decision Making.
Filter by:Advancements in prenatal genetic screening have significantly improved the identification of chromosomal abnormalities and heritable conditions during pregnancy, yet current standards for patient education in this domain are largely ineffective. The most effective approach to education about prenatal screening is one-on-one genetic counseling, but due to the limited number of counselors this is not feasible, especially in rural and frontier areas. The investigators will address this national problem using a novel education game that can more effectively address this gap in healthcare decision-making.
An interactive web-based decision aid for shared decision making: birth choice after cesarean in Taiwan Background: Taiwan has a high national caesarean rate coupled with a low vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) rate. Studies suggest that pregnant women do not receive sufficient information about birth choices after caesarean in Taiwan and shared decision making (SDM) is not an expectation. Chen conducted a pilot study. Improvements in knowledge for the decision aid group were larger than for the usual care group, although differences between groups were not statistically significant. An interactive multimedia technology and humanity communication may provide opportunities to increase engagement and support women during decision consultations. Following previous pilot study, the study aims to examine the effectiveness of an interactive web-based birth decision aid for SDM in pregnant women who have had a previous cesarean. Methods: A quantitative approach will be conducted with a randomized pre-test and post-test experimental design in a medical center in northern Taiwan. Participants who have had one previous CS will be recruited at 14-16 weeks. A total of 172 women will be completed a baseline survey and will be randomly allocated to either the intervention (usual care plus an interactive web-based birth decision aid ) or usual care (general maternal health booklet) group. A follow up survey at 35-38 weeks measured change in decisional conflict, knowledge, birth preference and decision aid acceptability. Actual birth outcomes and satisfaction will be assessed one month after birth. Contributions/ Implementation of clinical practice The study will potentially increase women and obstetricians to support VBAC and SDM. The interactive decision aid tool may reduce time-consumption for health education. Linking web-based data analysis of AI into medical record can be beneficial for clinical practice and research in the future.
Recent recommendations to return children's results for adult-onset conditions to parents anytime whole exome or genome sequencing is performed, as well as growing expectations to return research results to participants on a large-scale basis, mean adolescents will increasingly be engaged in assenting (<age 18) and consenting (>age 18) to return of genomic research results. There is an urgent need to understand adolescents' informational preferences and to create ethically informed, scalable processes that empower adolescents from diverse backgrounds to participate in the decision-making process about learning genomic results. This research will provide important insights into adolescents' choices, as well as the ethical, legal and societal implications of engaging adolescents in making choices about learning genomic results in genomic research and community-based research settings.
Background: Breast cancer rehabilitation has gradually expanded from post-surgery rehabilitation to continuous rehabilitation including prehabilitation between cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment, post-surgery rehabilitation, and return-to-work/return-home interventions. Continuous rehabilitation provides patients with tailored training at each treatment period, in order to maintain patients' functions or accelerate the recovery of functions, reduce the burden of symptoms, and improve patients' independence and quality of life. As the functional rehabilitation needs and lifestyle adjustment needs of each patient's life role are different, only with an interprofessional rehabilitation team, patients can obtain patient-centered and comprehensive rehabilitation interventions. Interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) is an decision-making process that interprofessional team and patients discussion the treatment options, based on the best evidence and patient values and preferences, to make a patient-centered treatment decision. However, the major barriers of the implementation of IP-SDM are the lack of IP-SDM skills of clinicians and the lack of medical knowledge of patients. Purposes: The project aims (1) to develop a patient-centered continuous and interdisciplinary shared decision making approach for breast cancer rehabilitation, including IP-SDM training for interprofessional rehabilitation team, as well as decision coaching, patient decision aid and question prompt list for patients; and (2) to examine the effects of IP-SDM approach on the IP-SDM self-efficacy of interprofessional rehabilitation team and patients, quality of IP-SDM process, patients' satisfaction with decision, concordance between preferences and the chosen options, patients' upper limb function and health-related quality of life.
Most older people want to stay at home as long as possible. Effective self-management for people losing autonomy depends on reliable monitoring of their mobility, health and safety and active implication in decision-making. New technologies have the potential to provide information about changing patterns that reflect changing care needs. This information could help older adults, caregivers and health professionals to participate in decision-making about housing options when a change in living environment needs to be considered.
Although a CT scan is required for some Emergency Department patients with signs and symptoms of a kidney stone, recent evidence has shown that routine scanning is unnecessary and may expose young patients to significant cumulative radiation, increasing their risk of future cancers. Shared Decision-Making may facilitate diagnostic imaging decisions that are more inline with patients' values and preferences. By comparing a shared approach to diagnostic decision-making to a traditional, physician-directed approach, this study lays the foundation for a future randomized trial that will reduce radiation exposure, improve engagement, and improve the quality and patient-centeredness of Emergency Department care.
Shared decision-making helps patients to establish a treatment plan with clinicians together. Our goal was to determine if the tools we developed could reduced decisional conflict for patients with obstructive sleep apnea.