Clinical Trials Logo

Shared Decision Making clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Shared Decision Making.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03266796 Completed - Clinical trials for Shared Decision Making

Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: a Cross-sectional Observational Study

Start date: September 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Shared decision making (SDM) is increasingly recommended in health care and reduces the unbalanced power between physical therapists and patients. There is an increased focus on communication between physical therapists and their patients during the goal setting process in current research. This study will focus on SDM in physical therapy goal setting. The SDM Process includes a problem definition and different goal options. Good communication between physical therapists and patients during the goal setting process with an explicit agreeing on both sides regarding treatment goals and options improves patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health outcomes. Patients generally prefer to be actively involved in the shared decision making process. However, the preferred level of involvement of patients regarding decisions differs. Therefore, physical therapist should consider about patients' preferred level of involvement in shared decision making. Previous research observed SDM behaviours of physical therapists only in private practice settings. Research in other settings like the rehabilitation setting are recommended. It is unknown whether there are differences between settings in the SDM behaviours of physical therapists during first consultation.

NCT ID: NCT01519999 Completed - Clinical trials for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Colorectal Cancer Screening With Improved Shared Decision Making

CRCS-WISDM
Start date: May 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to increase colorectal cancer screening by implementing a community-wide shared decision-making (SDM) intervention, which embeds shared decision making within clinical practice and also uses an extensive community engagement campaign. The investigators hypothesize that colorectal cancer screening adherence will be higher in the intervention group (participating communities) compared to the usual care control group (non-participating comparison communities).