View clinical trials related to Severe Mental Disorder.
Filter by:In recent years, the prevalence of severe mental disorders in China has continued to grow, and the burden of disease in society has continued to rise. In order to improve the prognosis of patients with severe mental disorders and reduce the risk of disease relapse or readmission, researchers established a cohort based on the Ningbo Mental Health Information System in Ningbo, a sub-provincial city in the southern wing of the Yangtze River Delta of China, with a resident population of more than 9 million, and linked it to the residents' health records, and through the data linkage obtained data on patients in the full cycle of pre-diagnosis, diagnosis, follow-up, disease changes and death, realising full-cycle management of patients with severe mental disorders. Currently, NEED has accumulated data on more than 50,000 patients with severe mental disorders and obtained multi-dimensional longitudinal information through long-term follow-up and data linkage. All diseases follow the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10) for clinical coding, and available data include baseline demographics, past history, family history, social functioning deficit screening scale scores, risk assessment, and so on and longitudinal health information from electronic health records (EHR), providing a solid data base for future real-world studies.
A single-centre prospective randomised controlled trial will be conducted with a minimum of 47 patients with severe mental disorder (SMD) who will be randomly assigned into two groups, 1 intervention group receiving dance therapy (n=26) and 1 control group who will not receive any intervention or added treatment apart from continuing with their usual treatment (pharmacological), but will not receive intervention with dance therapy (n=21). In summary, the groups are: - Experimental group (n=26): people with SMD receiving dance therapy. - Control group (n=21): people with SMD who do not receive the dance therapy intervention but do receive their usual pharmacological treatment. Tests will be administered before the start of the study and at the end of the study, as well as 3 months after the end of the study in order to compare the results between groups.
People with severe mental illness (SMI), defined as psychotic and bipolar disorders, die 17-20 years earlier than the general population, the most common cause of death being cardiovascular diseases (CVD). The major contributor to CVD mortality in SMI is the increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to the general population. T2D is a paradigm of a single condition that progresses to multiple conditions. T2D requires annual reviews of 9 diabetes care processes and for patients to adopt multiple self-care tasks to prevent diabetes complications. The 9 diabetes care processes outlined by the NICE guidelines include: 3-6 monthly blood glucose measurement (HbA1c) with targets; blood pressure measurements and targets; annual blood cholesterol measurement; kidney function testing with urinary albumin; kidney function testing with serum creatinine; weight check; smoking status; diabetes annual eye screening; and annual foot examination. Previous research has focused on upskilling mental health professionals or link workers in diabetes care, however, a primary care led focus to support individuals with T2D and SMI has not been investigated. This is an interventional study in Lambeth south London testing a new model of care for people with SMI and T2D that is led by the community DSN in collaboration with the PN and mental health team within the Hills Brook and Dales Primary Care Network (PCN). StockWELL PCN participants will act as controls. Participants will complete 7 validated questionnaires, a physical examination including a blood test and urine sample and a brief interview either face to face in their GP surgery. The intervention group will be invited to a clinic run by a DSN. Baseline measures will be repeated after 6 months in both groups. An exit interview will be conducted to determine participants thoughts on the intervention. This project has been funded by the Burdett Trust for Nursing.
Applied research carried out in the context of the Community Rehabilitation Service "Dr. Pi i Molist". The objective is to improve the psychosocial intervention carried out with the families of the patients treated (Severe Mental Disorder). It is proposed to carry out a qualitative needs analysis with relatives, patients and professionals, with the intention of detecting possibilities for improvement. With the results obtained, together with the bibliographic recommendations, a new intervention proposal is made and the new results obtained are evaluated. The hypothesis is that a form of intervention more adjusted to the real needs of the population and more effective for the engagement of families and the improvement of the quality of life of patients and their families can be found.
People with severe mental illness (SMI) spend a great amount of time in their homes. The home is thus of vital importance for an everyday life with meaningful activities. Systematic description of possibilities for meaningful activity in Supported Housing (SH) is however lacking. Even more importantly, support to meaningful activity in the SH context is sadly lacking. That there is a need for support to activity for those who live in SH is partly evident from research, but has also become obvious through several contacts between the investigators' research group and staff working in SH settings. In a first step the investigators described how people with SMI use their time while being at home and how the participants perceive their possibilities for being active. Comparisons were made with people with SMI who had ordinary housing and got housing support. A mixed-methods approach with well-established rating scales and qualitative interviews was used. The current study aims are to: 1. Based on the findings from Step 1 above, develop an intervention for those who live in SH. The intervention goal is to increase the possibilities for satisfying engagement in activities in one's home. The intervention will also build on previous experiences form developing and evaluating interventions for the target group. 2. Investigate what changes people who participate in such an intervention will make regarding engagement in activities, satisfaction with activities, recovery from mental illness, self-rated health, and quality of life. 3. Investigate how users and staff perceive the SH services' possibilities to offer or stimulate to different types of activity, as well as their satisfaction with the new intervention. People with SMI are a sadly neglected group with respect to access to meaningful activities. Enriching supported with features that enable more meaningful activity in the home context could lead to gains for the individual (increased well-being) as well as society (better services and decreased needs for support). The project is of relevance for both persons with SMI and society through its emphasis on 1) well-being among people with substantial functional limitations and 2) a meaningful everyday life in the intersection between housing and activity.
The investigators aim to test the effectiveness of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) on 1. employment, 2. welfare dependency, and 3. public-sector health care utilization. This is a naturalistic controlled trial, where one municipality (Bodø in Norway) with about 50000 inhabitants get access to IPS services in public sector mental health services during the period 2013-2016. The target group for the intervention is patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in the age group 18-40 at time of treatment. Patients already receiving lifelong disability benefits will be excluded. The control group will be an average of 10 municipalities in Norway without IPS services. Data for outcomes will be based on public registries available for research.
A single-blinded hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (Type II), that both evaluates the intervention outcomes (clinical and service use outcomes) through patient-randomization in the implementation sites, as well as evaluates the implementation strategy chosen for the intervention and its impact on implementation outcomes (e.g. adoption, fidelity, acceptability and maintenance (continued implementation) of the intervention).