Septic Shock Clinical Trial
Official title:
Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory
PiCCO has been widely used in critical care settings for several decades. Together with pulmonary artery catheter, it is regarded as the important tool for guiding fluid management in patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, its effects on patients' outcome remain untested. The investigators study is a pilot study that is designed to test whether the use of PiCCO will improve patients' outcome, as compared to those without PiCCO monitoring.
PiCCO comprises techniques of pulse contour analysis and transpulmonary thermodilution, and can provide important information on hemodynamics and pulmonary functions. It has been widely used in critical care settings for several decades. Together with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), it is regarded as the important tool for guiding fluid management in patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. During last two decades, many well designed clinical trials have been conducted to see whether the use of PAC would benefit patient outcome. The result consistently showed that PAC added no benefit in terms of mortality, ICU length of stay, organ failure free survival days, and the length of mechanical ventilation. Since PiCCO is relatively new to PAC, and its effects on patients' outcome remain untested. The investigators study is a pilot study that is designed to test whether the use of PiCCO will improve patients' outcome, as compared to those without PiCCO monitoring. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03649633 -
Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine, and Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome in Septic Shock
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT04117568 -
The Role of Emergency Neutrophils and Glycans in Postoperative and Septic Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT04227652 -
Control of Fever in Septic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05629780 -
Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04796636 -
High-dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Patients With Septic Shock
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03335124 -
The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04005001 -
Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05217836 -
Iron Metabolism Disorders in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05066256 -
LV Diastolic Function vs IVC Diameter Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Shock
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05443854 -
Impact of Aminoglycosides-based Antibiotics Combination and Protective Isolation on Outcomes in Critically-ill Neutropenic Patients With Sepsis: (Combination-Lock01)
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04516395 -
Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02899143 -
Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02676427 -
Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02580240 -
Administration of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02565251 -
Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02547467 -
TOADS Study: TO Assess Death From Septic Shock.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02638545 -
Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Septic Shock
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02335723 -
ASSET - a Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Investigation With Alteco® LPS Adsorber
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02204852 -
Co-administration of Iloprost and Eptifibatide in Septic Shock Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02079402 -
Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care
|
Phase 4 |