ED Tracking Sheet Implementation

Sepsis Clinical Trial

Official title:

ED Tracking Sheet Implementation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05213923
• Other study ID #: STUDY02001224
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: June 1, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether implementation of an ED Sepsis Tracking Sheet effects the percentage of goal-directed sepsis criteria met in a tertiary care academic Emergency Department.

Description:

Sepsis remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the hospital setting. Accurate diagnosis and timely initiation of therapy are important drivers of patient-centered outcomes in sepsis management. Compliance with the core measures listed in the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines has been variable. An ED-specific Sepsis Tracking Sheet (STS) - a tool for implementing and documenting critical actions in sepsis management - was created at our institution by a team of physicians, nurses, and ED pharmacists. Dedicated ED pharmacists were instructed to fill this sheet within one hour of the sepsis-specific best practice advisory (BPA) being activated in the ED. Core measures associated with the one hour and three hour sepsis bundles were tracked and outcomes were compared pre- and post-implementation of the STS.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 194
• Est. completion date: June 1, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: June 1, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Over 18 years old
• Initially evaluated in the DHMC Lebanon Emergency Department
• Activated sepsis BPA upon initial presentation (triage history consistent with infection combined with 2 or more SIRS criteria? Are these the criteria that trigger our sepsis BPA?)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who are transferred to the DHMC Lebanon Emergency Department from another facility
• Patients with absent data regarding one or more of the goal-directed sepsis criteria
• Patients who did not initially meet criteria to trigger the sepsis BPA, but developed sepsis later in their hospital course

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Sepsis
• Severe Sepsis
• Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
• Toxemia

Intervention

Procedure:
• ED Sepsis Tracking Sheet
Implementation of an ED Sepsis Tracking Sheet. This sheet will track time of patient presentation, time of High-Acuity Medical Response (HAMR) page, time of bilateral 18g or larger IV access, time of initial lactate, time two sets of blood cultures were sent, time antibiotics were administered as well as which antibiotics and what dose, time initial IV fluid bolus was completed, time repeat lactate was sent, timing of post-IV-fluid bolus vital signs, as well as the presence of persistent hypotension following this IV fluid bolus and whether or not vasopressors were applied.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center	Lebanon	New Hampshire

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (8)

Coba V, Whitmill M, Mooney R, Horst HM, Brandt MM, Digiovine B, Mlynarek M, McLellan B, Boleski G, Yang J, Conway W, Jordan J; (The Henry Ford Hospital Sepsis Collaborative Group). Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never. J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10. — View Citation

Downing NL, Rolnick J, Poole SF, Hall E, Wessels AJ, Heidenreich P, Shieh L. Electronic health record-based clinical decision support alert for severe sepsis: a randomised evaluation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):762-768. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008765. Epub 2019 Mar 14. — View Citation

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, Allegranzi B, Reinhart K. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22. — View Citation

Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, Townsend SR, Schorr CA, Beale R, Osborn T, Lemeshow S, Chiche JD, Artigas A, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723. — View Citation

Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):4-11. doi: 10.4161/viru.27372. Epub 2013 Dec 11. — View Citation

Schorr C, Odden A, Evans L, Escobar GJ, Gandhi S, Townsend S, Levy M. Implementation of a multicenter performance improvement program for early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in general medical-surgical wards. J Hosp Med. 2016 Nov;11 Suppl 1:S32-S39. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2656. — View Citation

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of goal-directed sepsis criteria met	Goal-directed sepsis criteria involve the following: 1) Was an initial lactate obtained? 2) Were two sets of blood cultures sent? 3) Were antibiotics given within one hour of identification of severe sepsis? 4) Was the patient given an initial IV fluid bolus? 5) Was a repeat lactate sent if the initial lactate was elevated? These five criteria will be assessed as "met" or "not met" for each patient. The total of "met" and "not met" criteria will be aggregated across patients. The percentage of goal-directed sepsis criteria met will be calculated as "met" criteria divided by the sum of "met" plus "not met" criteria.	Time of ED presentation to the time of in-hospital death or hospital discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Secondary	Length of hospital stay	Time of ED presentation to the time of in-hospital death or hospital discharge, measured in days.	Time of ED presentation to the time of in-hospital death or hospital discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Secondary	In-hospital mortality	Death attributed to any cause occurring at any time between the patient's ED presentation and hospital discharge.	Time of ED presentation to the time of in-hospital death or hospital discharge, approximately 2 weeks