View clinical trials related to Sepsis Syndrome.
Filter by:Sepsis is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by a dynamic course and a clinical outcome dependent on several factors, and responsible for one in five deaths worldwide. The aim of this trial is to identify new prognostic markers for the progression of sepsis to septic shock, by comparing epigenetic markers between patients who have or have not developed severe forms of sepsis. The main objective of this preliminary study is to identify prognostic markers for the progression of sepsis to septic shock, i.e. to compare targeted markers between subjects with sepsis who progress to septic shock versus subjects with sepsis who do not progress to septic shock.
This study aims to identify the prognostic role of procalcitonin (PCT), soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 (sTREM-1), the soluble form of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and azurocidin 1 (AZU1) in 28-day mortality for patients with sepsis in Emergency Department.
The goal of this study is to compare two different ways of helping patients with a condition called sepsis who need help breathing using a machine called a ventilator. The investigators want to study which way of setting the ventilator is better for the lungs. Here are the main questions the investigators want to answer: 1. How does the amount of air in the lungs and the way it moves differ between the two ways? 2. How does the way air spreads out in different parts of the lungs differ between the two ways? In this study, the investigators will take special pictures of the lungs using a machine called a CT scan. The pictures will show us how much the lungs stretch and how much air is in different parts of the lungs. The investigators will compare two different ways of using the ventilator: one personalized for each patient based on their breathing, and another way that is commonly used. By comparing these two ways, the investigators hope to learn which one is better for helping patients with sepsis who need the ventilator. This information can help doctors make better decisions about how to care for these patients and improve their breathing.
The popuse of this study is to assess the inflammatory immunophenotypes of sepsis patients are significantly correlated with prognosis, which may provide theoretical basis for precise immune regulation of sepsis.
Continuous renal replacement therapy is widely used in intensive care medicine, which is known as an alternative therapy to save injured kidney . Anticoagulation is an important part of this therapy. An insufficient anticoagulation would cause a poor curative effect of CRRT. Hemorrhageļ¼heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), citrate accumulation, acidosis ad filter extra-cost usually happened on anticoagulation during CRRT. Therefore a new effective anticoagulation of CRRT needs to be carried out. Nafamostat Mesylate (NM) is a new anticoagulant. This serine protease inhibitor with broad spectrum can inhibit kinds of enzymes on the process of coagulation. NM is mainly rapidly decomposed in the liver and also removed by dialysis or filtration. The elimination half life of is only 8 minutes. If NM is applied as a regional anticoagulant, approximate 40% NM is removed by dialysis and / or convection in cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, and then rapidly degraded by esterase in liver and blood, which ensures security in patients with bleeding tendency. Based on the information above, the investigators designed an observational clinical study aimed to testify that NM would have equivalent anticoagulant results compared with those traditional ways and might even have a better effect than traditional anticoagulant therapy.The study team has investigated the current situation of CRRT in Shaanxi province in China through a cross-sectional survey last year. The survey involved 74 hospitals in Shaanxi province and the results basically illustrated a real status of CRRT. These scientific results helped investigators to design this multi-center, parallel, controlled, non intervention study and real world study.
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when a dysregulated response to infection results in multi-organ dysfunction or failure. This can affect any organ, resulting in a diverse clinical presentation. Sepsis affects more than 3.4 million Europeans a year with 700,000 deaths from the condition and an additional one third of survivors dying through complications in the year following a sepsis event. To date, biomarkers that are used to predict bacterial infection (such as CRP or lactate) are used in combination and with other clinical symptoms due to the fact that they are non-specific for sepsis. The use of such biomarkers frequently varies between hospitals or even physicians. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin (PCT) have been reported as useful for differentiating between infectious and non-infectious causes of systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Yet calibration of PCT assays is problematic due to the absence of higher order method or international standard. External quality assessment (EQA) programs have highlighted poor comparability. This protocol is part of the international SEPTIMET project. The Emergency Department (ED) of the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital takes part of the project with specific objectives in order to establish a large cohort of patients at very early stage sepsis (defined by Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome -SIRS - due to bacterial infection or the first symptoms of sepsis before septic shock, patients consulting in the first hours of the history of the disease at the emergency department) with the idea of spotting the condition before it manifests as a more serious presentation. This will measure the clinical criteria and putative biomarkers as patients progress to more serious presentation. Moreover, an expected biobank of >200 samples will be generated to provide material for the Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'essais (LNE) in charge of analytical studies.
The intensive care units is of the main components of modern healthcare systems. Formally, its aim is to offer the critically ill health care fit to their needs; ensuring that this health care is appropriate, sustainable, ethical and respectful of their autonomy. Intensive medicine is a cross-sectional specialty that encompasses a broad spectrum of pathologies in their most severe condition, and specifically has as its foundation the practice of comprehensive care of the patient with organ dysfunction and susceptible to recovery. Although critically ill patients are a heterogeneous population, they have in common the need for a high level of care, often requiring the use of high technology, specific procedures for the support of organ dysfunction and the collaboration of other medical and surgical specialties for their management and treatment. Since their origins in the late 1950s, intensive care units have been adapting to the changes arising from the best scientific evidence. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there were some successful clinical trials published that had tested alternative management strategies in the ICU. Mechanical ventilation is an intervention that defines the critical care specialty. Between 1970 and the 1990s, the management focused on normalizing arterial blood gas with aggressive mechanical ventilation. Over the ensuing decades, it became apparent that performing positive pressure ventilation worsened lung injury. The pivotal moment in the mechanical ventilation story would be the low versus high tidal volume trial. This trial shifted the focus away from normalizing gas exchange to reducing harm with mechanical ventilation. Further, it paved way for further trials testing ventilation interventions (PEEP strategy, prone position ventilation) and nonventilation interventions (neuromuscular blockade, corticosteroids, inhaled nitric oxide, extracorporeal gas exchange) in critically ill patients. That evidence-based intensive care medicine has undoubtedly had an influence on the outcome of critically ill patients, in general, and, particularly, of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Temporal changes in mortality over the time have been scarcely reported for patients admitted to intensive care unit. Objective of this study is to estimate the changes over the time in several outcomes in the patients admitted to an 18-beds medical-surgical intensive care unit from 1991 (year of start of activity) to 2026
The study aims to evaluate the suitability of the SOFA score implemented by the Sepsis 3 guideline to detect sepsis in patients suffering from subrarachnoid hemorrhage.
- This perspective blind randomized single center study was designed to assess central venous and arterial gases level including P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio and P(v-a)CO2 difference against lactate clearance as an indicator of initial resuscitation in septic patients in intensive care unit and to evaluate the success of early resuscitation protocol .this continuation of our previous work we compared the ratio of P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio against lactate clearance(8). Mortality in the ICU in the study groups will be recorded
This is a single-center prospective bio-specimen analysis and observational study aiming to define immune pathways disrupted in bacterial sepsis and to identify clinically useful biomarkers of immune status.