Clinical Trials Logo

Seach Results for — “prostate cancer”

Postoperative or Salvage Radiotherapy (RT) for Node Negative Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy

Postoperative or Salvage Radiotherapy for Node Negative Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy

The purpose of this study is to see what effects, good and/or bad, proton radiation, and/or conventional radiation and hormonal therapy (if applicable), has on prostate cancer that has already returned or the risk of prostate cancer returning.

NCT00969111 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Recruiting
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00969111/

Leuprolide Acetate or Goserelin Acetate Compared With Observation in Treating Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy

Phase II Trial of Temporary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy

This randomized phase II trial studies the side effects and how well giving leuprolide acetate or goserelin acetate works compared to observation in treating patients with high-risk prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Antihormone therapy, such as goserelin acetate and leuprolide acetate, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body and thus control prostate cancer growth. Many times, after surgery, the tumor may not need more treatment until it progresses. In this case, observation may be sufficient. However, in some prostate cancers there is a chance that tumors can re-grow despite surgery based on certain high risk features.

NCT00937768 — Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Status: Terminated
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-adenocarcinoma/NCT00937768/

Diindolylmethane in Treating Patients With Stage I or Stage II Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Phase II Trial of B-DIM (DIM: 3,3 Diindolylmethane) on Intermediate Endpoint Biomarkers in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Are Undergoing Prostatectomy

RATIONALE: The use of diindolylmethane, a substance found in cruciferous vegetables, may slow the growth of tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well diindolylmethane works in treating patients with stage I or stage II prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

NCT00888654 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00888654/

Study of Sunitinib Malate in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Prior to Prostatectomy

Investigator-Initiated Pilot Study of Sunitinib Malate in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Prior to Prostatectomy

The purpose of this study is to look at blood and tissue samples for changes following the use of Sunitinib malate. Additionally, we would like to find out if the drug, Sunitinib malate, is safe and works in men with prostate cancer. Sunitinib malate , also known as Sutent, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for treatment of tumors of intestines and kidney but it is being tested in research studies for use in men with prostate cancer.

NCT00672594 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00672594/

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel in High Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel in High Risk Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

The main purpose of this trial is to collect information and to evaluate the effects, good or bad, the combination of docetaxel and bevacizumab has on patients with high risk prostate cancer that are undergoing radical prostatectomy.

NCT00321646 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00321646/

Adjuvant Leuprolide With or Without Docetaxel in High Risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Trial Comparing Immediate Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy (ELIGARD®- Leuprolide Acetate) in Combination With TAXOTERE® (Docetaxel) Administered Every Three Weeks Versus Hormonal Therapy Alone Versus Deferred Therapy Followed by the Same Therapeutic Options in Patients With Prostate Cancer at High Risk of Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III study in participants at high risk of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The study will investigate - Treatment with docetaxel (TAXOTERE®) every three weeks (q3w) plus leuprolide acetate (ELIGARD®) versus leuprolide acetate alone (ELIGARD®) - Immediate treatment following prostatectomy versus deferred treatment at the time of relapse Using a 2x2 factorial design participants will therefore be randomized to - Immediate adjuvant treatment with docetaxel plus leuprolide acetate (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) - Immediate adjuvant treatment with leuprolide acetate alone (hormonal therapy) - Deferred treatment with docetaxel plus leuprolide acetate (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) - Deferred treatment with leuprolide acetate alone (hormonal therapy) Primary Objective: - The primary objective of the study is to compare progression-free survival using a 2x2 factorial design Secondary Objectives: - To compare the 5-year overall, cancer-specific and metastasis-free survival after systemic treatment between the groups - To compare the safety and tolerability between Docetaxel in combination with leuprolide acetate and leuprolide acetate alone. - To evaluate quality of life as measured by the FACT-P questionnaire. Originally, 1696 participants were planned in the study (with 424 participants randomized to each arm). However, only a total of 211 participants completed the randomization procedure as of 26 September 2007. Thus, sanofi-aventis, in accordance with the Steering Committee, decided to stop the participant recruitment as of 26 September 2007. Participants who had already signed their Informed Consent (IC) before September 26, 2007 were allowed to enter the randomization if they met eligibility criteria. The final revised number of planned participants to be randomly assigned to the 4 treatment arms was 250, and 228 participants were actually randomized. The final sample size did not allow all the statistical analyses to be conducted on efficacy data. Therefore, the protocol was amended to reflect the change in the plans for statistical analysis. The study was underpowered to serve as the basis for drawing conclusions regarding efficacy and quality of life (QoL) endpoints.

NCT00283062 — Prostatic Neoplasms
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostatic-neoplasms/NCT00283062/

Epidural Hydromorphone Compared With Hydromorphone Infusion in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Spinal Effects of Epidural Hydromorphone

RATIONALE: Giving hydromorphone in different ways may relieve the pain associated with cancer surgery. PURPOSE: Randomized double-blinded phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of epidural hydromorphone with hydromorphone infusion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

NCT00003115 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00003115/

Radiation Therapy With or Without Bicalutamide for Recurrent pT3N0 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

A PHASE III TRIAL OF RADIATION THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT CASODEX IN PATIENTS WITH PSA ELEVATION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR pT3N0 CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Androgens can stimulate the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy using bicalutamide may fight prostate cancer by reducing the production of androgens. It is not yet known if radiation therapy is more effective with or without bicalutamide for prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy with or without bicalutamide in treating patients who have stage II or stage III prostate cancer and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels following radical prostatectomy.

NCT00002874 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT00002874/

Expanded Access Protocol of 68Ga PSMA 11 PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer

68Ga PSMA-11 in Patients With Intermediate to High-risk Prostate Cancer Before Prostatectomy or With Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer.

This study provides expanded access to radiotracer Gallium 68 (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-HBED-CC (68Ga-PSMA-11) with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging for participants with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer before prostatectomy or for suspected biochemical recurrence of their prostate cancer. Compared to conventional imaging, 68Ga PSMA-HBED-CC might improve the ability to localize the sites of recurrent or metastatic disease, which helps with surgical and other treatment planning.

NCT04452136 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Approved for marketing
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT04452136/

Prostate Cancer Detection Rates of Standard Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and MR-guided Fusion Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection Rates of Standard Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and Multiparametric Prostate MR Guided MR-US Fusion Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. Today serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and digital rectal examination (DRE) are routinely used for screening of prostate cancer. In the case of higher PSA levels and/or abnormal DRE, 10-12 core standard transrectal prostate biopsy (STRUS-B) is preferred method.Most of the pathological T1 stage tumours are diagnosed by this method. But as the prostate volume increases, cancer detection rate of STRUS-B decreases.In the last decade multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMR) has gained importance in the diagnosis of prostate cancer beside the staging. Now it is possible to biopsies from lesions which are suspicious for cancer in mpMR. Recent studies have shown that mpMR guided prostate biopsies either transrectally or perineally have better cancer detection rates comparing STRUS-B, especially in patients with history of negative previous biopsy. But its use in biopsy naive settings is not recommended.In this study it is aimed to compare cancer detection rate of MR guided MR-US fusion transrectal prostate biopsy with STRUS-B.

NCT03936296 — Prostate Cancer
Status: Completed
http://inclinicaltrials.com/prostate-cancer/NCT03936296/