View clinical trials related to Sciatica.
Filter by:Low back pain and sciatica is a common condition resulting in high costs and disability for society and affected individuals. Presently there is a lack of evidence for what treatments may help this condition early in the course of care. Improved early management could reduce risks for persistent disability and high costs. The goal of this project is to examine the clinical outcomes and costs associated with adding a physical therapy program to early management of patients with low back pain and sciatica within primary care.
This trial will evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness of pharmacopuncture for severe non-acute sciatic pain patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with usual care of conventional medicine and that of Korean medicine (acupuncture). Sixty patients with severe non-acute sciatic pain patients diagnosed with LDH (NRS ≥5, 4 weeks - 6 months) will be recruited, and randomized 20 each to the Shinbaro pharmacopuncture, acupuncture, and usual care group, respectively. The 2 acupuncture groups will receive 2 sessions/week of acupuncture alone or with pharmacopuncture for 4 weeks, and the usual care group will receive conventional medication 2 times/day and 2 sessions/week of physical therapy. Post-treatment evaluations will take place 5, 7, 9, and 12 weeks after randomization.
Sciatica due to herniated disc is a major cause of disability in young adults. Surgery is the gold-standard and the only controlled treatment in case of failure of conservative treatment. Percutaneous chemonucleolysis with Discogel® may be a valuable alternative to surgery. In addition, Discogel® chemonucleolysis appears as a relatively innocuous technique which may avoid 2% complications after disc surgery and 5% repeated surgery (according to recent trials). This will be the first randomized trial comparing Discogel® chemonucleolysis versus surgery in patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation and unresponsive to conservative medical treatments (including epidural steroid injections) Our expectation is that Discogel® chemonucleolysis will avoid surgery in 80% of the patients.
The primary objective is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a non-awake implantation method (EMG neuromonitoring) of a SCS paddle lead as compared to an awake implantation method (with local anesthesia and patient feedback).This is a post-market, prospective, multicenter, parallel designed, non-randomized, non-blinded, 6-month study. A minimum of 50 patients will be implanted from up to 4 active sites, coordinated by a single lead investigator. Patients who have had a successful SCS trial and are indicated for permanent implantation will be approached to participate in this study prior to permanent implantation. Patients will be recruited and enrolled by physicians at any one of the involved sites. Each Investigator will only use one method (awake or non-awake) according to his/her typical practice. Patients will receive treatment from their enrolling physician.
In discal sciatica, after failure of medical treatment, the investigators propose frequently a spinal infiltration of corticoids the most closer of disco-radicular conflict. Recently, some cases of paraplegia during lumbar foraminal infiltrations have induce a reduction of indications of this type of infiltration. An alternative would be to propose a lateral epidural infiltration on contact with conflict.The objective of this study is to compare, in 112 patients with a less than 6 months discal sciatica, the efficacy on pain of a non target posterior epidural space infiltration of corticoids done at L3-L4 stage on scan control versus an epidural infiltration of the same corticoid done in lateral on contact of disco radicular conflict on scan control.
The purpose of this study is to see if the spine shows areas of inflammation using a specific type of imaging (pictures).
The aim of this study is to compare two levels (high and low forces) of short term lumbar traction on pain and functional tests of the lower limbs in a specific population of patients presenting with acute lumbar sciatica secondary to disc herniation. The investigators hypothesize that, in this particular medical condition, high level of lumbar traction might be more effective than low level lumbar traction in decreasing the pain associated with acute sciatica.
This multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and health-economics of electroacupuncture for sciatica due to intervertebral disc displacement in 3 compared groups: electroacupuncture, electroacupuncture plus traction, electroacupuncture plus traction and medication.
The investigators report management of lumbar disc herniation with severe sciatic pain using an integrative complementary and alternative medicine approach with a 5 year follow-up.
This study aims to verify if patients with nerve-related leg pain benefits from neurodynamic treatment over two weeks.