View clinical trials related to Schizophrenia.
Filter by:The goal of this project is to show that the best possible option for preventing relapses in patients suffering from first episode (<1 year of anti-psychotic medication) or early phase (< 5 years of lifetime exposure to anti-psychotic medication) schizophrenia is by enhancing medication adherence. The study is designed to answer the question of whether the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics early in the course of treatment can break the cycle of frequent relapse that affects so many patients with early phase schizophrenia. The participating research sites (not individual patients) will be randomly assigned to either medication prescribed by their treating physician (with no restrictions) or to a regimen that involves a monthly long acting injectable antipsychotic. The sites will be assigned on a one to one basis to either of the arms taking into account types of patient population and geographical area. Patients enrolled in the study will participate in regular assessments either over the phone or in person and be followed for a period of 2 years. The primary outcome measure is time to first hospitalization.
Investigating the effects of non-invasive transcranial current stimulation as a treatment for auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia.
The aim of the project is to investigate the use of Raloxifene (a new form of estrogen) in the treatment of young women with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Raloxifene is a Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM),which means that it can affect the central nervous system (CNS) effects of estrogen (eg. improving emotional symptoms, memory, information processing and concentration), without adversely affecting reproductive tissue/organs such as breast, uterus and ovaries. The investigators are conducting a double-blind, placebo controlled, three month study comparing the psychotic symptom response of women with schizophrenia in both groups. One group will receive standard antipsychotic medication plus 120mg Raloxifene, while the second group will receive standard antipsychotic medication plus oral placebo.
"Shared decision-making" is being promoted as a promising approach for engaging patients with schizophrenia in medical decisions and improving satisfaction and adherence. To implement shared decision-making, both physicians and patients should commit to it and engage in a mutual decision process. Most research, however, has addressed interventions that either focus on the doctors' side (e.g. "communication skills") or on informing patients about treatment options (e.g. "decision aids"). These approaches have been shown to be feasible in clinical practice but had no strong effects on treatment patterns or adherence, possibly because they were insufficient to motivate and enable patients to engage actively in decision-making. Moreover, these interventions still rely on the doctor's willingness to share decisions, which has been shown to vary considerably. To overcome these limitations and since many patients do not feel competent to participate in decision-making we developed an intervention that focuses on patients' communicative competencies. this intervention, a five session group-training, will be implemented for inpatients suffering from schizophrenia.
Recent research has suggested that mindfulness-based interventions for psychosis may be effective in reducing the negative symptoms of schizophrenia (e.g., social withdrawal, lack of motivation) and the distress associated with psychotic symptoms (e.g., hearing voices) and could lead to improvements in functioning and quality of life. However these findings are based on small studies that largely consist of patients with chronic illness. Little is yet known about the use of mindfulness interventions for young people recovering from their first episode of psychosis. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the Mindfulness Ambassador Council (MAC), a 12-week facilitated group intervention promoting mindfulness skills and the development of emotional and social competencies, is an effective, feasible, and acceptable means of treating youth in the early stages of psychotic illnesses. Although the current study is hypothesis generating in nature, based on previous investigations of Mindfulness Based Interventions for psychoses (Chadwick, 2014), we are expecting that participating in the MAC intervention will result in improvements in clinical, cognitive, functional, and health service utilization parameters. Additionally, we expect that the MAC intervention will prove to be acceptable to participants and a feasible intervention for early psychotic disorders.
The main objective of the study is to analyse the role of a neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as a putative biological marker of the cognitive recovery in schizophrenia following a Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT). Additionally, the role as outcome predictors of BDNF serum levels and the Val66met polymorphism and data from functional and structural neuroimaging will be studied.
The study is a prospective 2 year multimodal follow-up study of initially antipsychotic-naïve first-episode psychotic patients involving a standardized intervention with monotherapy with aripiprazole during the first 6 weeks. Patients and matched healthy controls will be examined after 6 weeks, 6 months and 2 years. They will be examined with MR-scannings, neurocognitive tests, EEG, and PET-scannings.
To test the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) versus enhanced Treatment as Usual (eTAU) delivered by hospital staff for inpatients with psychotic-spectrum disorders.
The study evaluates the long term safety of DSP-5423P in patients with schizophrenia.
The goal of this project, which has not changed, is to evaluate the statewide implementation of a two-component intervention (health promotion plus academic detailing) with respect to consumer outcomes and changes in provider prescribing. The intervention, called In SHAPE, is delivered to people with serious mental illness (SMI) by two community mental health clinics (CMHCs). These CMHCs are compared to two CMHCs delivering usual-care to individuals with SMI. The specific aims of this study are: 1. Evaluate person-level and provider-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors, health indicators, mental health indicators, and acute health service utilization, (b) provider prescribing practices and program fidelity, and (c) program costs. 2. Evaluate system-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors and health indicators, (b) provider prescribing and program fidelity, and (c) acute services use.