Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The diagnosis of diseases causing memory difficulties or dementia is often challenging. Without the use of advanced methods such as cerebrospinal fluid tests, approximately 25-30% do not receive a correct diagnosis today. However, the investigators have recently developed new blood biomarkers with high diagnostic accuracy, and the investigators now want to investigate whether they can eventually replace cerebrospinal fluid tests. This is because blood tests are much more cost-effective and significantly easier for patients compared to cerebrospinal fluid tests. In this study, 1200 patients undergoing clinical evaluations at the Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, are included for blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collection. The blood samples are sent for analysis using the new blood biomarkers. Subsequently, the results are compared with those from the clinical analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to determine how well they perform in routine clinical practice as an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid tests and whether the blood test improves patient care. This comparison is carried out by the attending physician in three steps: 1. Assessment without access to the results of either the blood test or cerebrospinal fluid test. 2. Assessment with access to only the results of the blood test. 3. Assessment with access to the results of both the blood test and cerebrospinal fluid test. Aim 1) To prospectively validate plasma Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers for diagnosis of patients with cognitive symptoms who are evaluated in a specialist memory clinic. Aim 2) Determine whether blood AD biomarkers improve patient management in specialist memory clinic settings.


Clinical Trial Description

The diagnosis of diseases causing memory difficulties or dementia is often challenging. Without the use of advanced methods such as cerebrospinal fluid tests, approximately 25-30% do not receive a correct diagnosis today. However, the investigators have recently developed new blood biomarkers with high diagnostic accuracy, and the investigators now want to investigate whether they can eventually replace cerebrospinal fluid tests. This is because blood tests are much more cost-effective and significantly easier for patients compared to cerebrospinal fluid tests. In this study, 1200 patients undergoing clinical evaluations at the Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, are included for blood and cerebrospinal fluid sample collection. The blood samples are sent for analysis using the new blood biomarkers. Subsequently, the results are compared with those from the clinical analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to determine how well they perform in routine clinical practice as an alternative to cerebrospinal fluid tests and whether the blood test improves patient care. This comparison is carried out by the attending physician in three steps: 1. Assessment without access to the results of either the blood test or cerebrospinal fluid test. 2. Assessment with access to only the results of the blood test. 3. Assessment with access to the results of both the blood test and cerebrospinal fluid test. Aim 1) To prospectively validate plasma AD biomarkers for diagnosis of patients with cognitive symptoms who are evaluated in a specialist memory clinic. The investigators here intend to study the clinical robustness and accuracy of plasma AD biomarkers in real-world settings by using high-performing plasma assays over 2-3 years, focusing on a specialist memory clinic population (n=1200). In this study plasma samples are collected as part of clinical praxis and analyzed on a bi-weekly basis throughout the study period (and not in single batches/at study closure). The investigators will (1) use pre-defined cut offs for each biomarker (similar to real world clinical practice), and (2) use an accurate reference standard (i.e., presence of AD brain pathology as determined with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 [Lumipulse; Fujirebio] and CSF P-tau217 [Eli Lilly]). The investigators will strive to recruit diverse and representative populations of patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia. The effects of potential confounders (such as kidney function) on diagnostic accuracy will also be studied. The investigators will only use really top-performing plasma assays for each biomarker, including p-tau217 and Ab42/Ab40. Expected outcomes: The investigators will 1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of different plasma AD biomarkers, 2) establish an optimal combination of plasma biomarkers for detection of AD brain pathology and 3) identify the effects of different potential confounding factors (e.g., kidney function) on the performance of different plasma biomarkers, when used prospectively in both real-world specialist and primary care populations. Aim 2) Determine whether blood AD biomarkers improve patient management in specialist memory clinic settings. As often noted by regulatory authorities, it is important to know if novel diagnostic methods improve the actual management of patients in real world settings. Consequently, the investigators study whether the most promising plasma biomarkers for symptomatic AD (including plasma p-tau217) will improve AD diagnosis beyond what is currently done as part of clinical practice. The dementia experts will document the most likely diagnosis (and the certainty of the diagnosis) after having performed an interview with the patient and informant, as well as evaluated the patient's cognitive test results, routine blood tests and structural brain imaging. The physician will then re-evaluate the diagnosis (and certainty of diagnosis) after having obtained the plasma p-tau217 results, and the pre- and posttest diagnosis will be compared to the reference standard (i.e., presence of AD brain pathology as determined with CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 [Lumipulse; Fujirebio] and CSF P-tau217 [Eli Lilly]). Change in treatment and care of the patient after evaluating the p-tau217 results will also be recorded similar to how amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) was evaluated in the IDEAS study. Expected outcomes: The investigators will determine whether the addition of plasma AD biomarkers to current clinical practice in memory clinics and/or primary care improves diagnosis and management of patients with SCD, MCI or mild dementia. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT06122415
Study type Observational
Source Skane University Hospital
Contact Oskar Hansson, MD, PhD
Phone +46-40-331000
Email oskar.hansson@med.lu.se
Status Recruiting
Phase
Start date December 1, 2022
Completion date December 31, 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04044495 - Sleep, Rhythms and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Completed NCT04079803 - PTI-125 for Mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease Patients Phase 2
Terminated NCT03052712 - Validation and Standardization of a Battery Evaluation of the Socio-emotional Functions in Various Neurological Pathologies N/A
Recruiting NCT04520698 - Utilizing Palliative Leaders In Facilities to Transform Care for Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04606420 - Can Lifestyle Changes Reverse Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT05820919 - Enhancing Sleep Quality for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia - R33 Phase N/A
Terminated NCT03672474 - REGEnLIFE RGn530 - Feasibility Pilot N/A
Completed NCT03430648 - Is Tau Protein Linked to Mobility Function?
Recruiting NCT04949750 - Efficacy of Paper-based Cognitive Training in Vietnamese Patients With Early Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT05288842 - Tanycytes in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
Recruiting NCT04522739 - Spironolactone Safety in African Americans With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer's Disease Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05557409 - A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AXS-05 in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease Agitation Phase 3
Completed NCT06194552 - A Multiple Dose Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NTRX-07 Phase 1
Completed NCT03239561 - Evaluation of Tau Protein in the Brain of Participants With Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Healthy Participants Early Phase 1
Completed NCT03184467 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GV1001 in Alzheimer Patients Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03676881 - Longitudinal Validation of a Computerized Cognitive Battery (Cognigram) in the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease
Terminated NCT03487380 - Taxonomic and Functional Composition of the Intestinal Microbiome: a Predictor of Rapid Cognitive Decline in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Completed NCT05538455 - Investigating ProCare4Life Impact on Quality of Life of Elderly Subjects With Neurodegenerative Diseases N/A
Recruiting NCT05328115 - A Study on the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of ALZ-101 in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease Phase 1
Completed NCT05562583 - SAGE-LEAF: Reducing Burden in Alzheimer's Disease Caregivers Through Positive Emotion Regulation and Virtual Support N/A