Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03936309
Other study ID # FWH20190005H
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2019
Est. completion date January 2025

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source 375th Medical Group, Scott Air Force Base
Contact Jill M Clark, MBA
Phone 7026533298
Email jill.m.clark15.ctr@mail.mil
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare scar infiltration with 0.5-1% Lidocaine at a dose of 3 mg/kg (max dose 300 mg) or scar deactivation with acupuncture surface release technique to determine which is more effective in reducing pain in adult patients with chronic, post-surgical pain related to the site of incision after low transverse Cesarean section compared to standard of care physical therapy with the McKenzie Method.


Description:

While there is not a clearly established and widely accepted pathophysiological cause to this post-operative pain, studies have estimated that between 7-33% of patients experience chronic peri-incisional pain after Cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision - a type of abdominal surgical incision that allows access to the abdomen and the most common method for performing Cesarean sections today - defined as pain persisting beyond the period of expected healing, approximately 3 months. Management of chronic peri-incisional pain after Cesarean section requires an extensive workup including laboratory testing (CBC, ESR, Urinalysis, STI testing) and imaging (transvaginal ultrasonography and abdominal CT) to rule out organic causes. Once a visceral etiology from postoperative pain has been excluded, there is not a well-established guideline dictating standard of care, however treatment can include analgesics such as Acetaminophen or Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, and in refractory cases suggestive of neuropathic pain Tricyclic Antidepressants, Gabapentin, Pregabalin, and Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors can be used. If medicinal therapy fails to manage symptoms, consultation for pain management specialists and/or surgical evaluation is often considered. Scar deactivation is used as standard of care for treatment and resolution of scar associated pain in patients with a history of Cesarean section by medical acupuncturists, both abdominal and/or low back pain that began after the cesarean section. Scar infiltration with lidocaine has been used in numerous clinical settings, masquerading under different names. Referred to as Neural Therapy in Germany, the technique of injecting short-acting local anesthetic into the dermal subcutaneous junction of scar tissue has been widely applied; however there is limited readily available clinical trial evidence supporting its reported effectiveness. Theoretically, it is postulated that the anti-inflammatory effects of local anesthetics play a role in mitigating the autonomic nervous system disruption of interference fields caused by scar tissue. Local anesthetics promote anti-inflammatory activity through a variety of mechanisms including reversibly inhibiting leukocyte adhesion by interfering with the action of integrins and leukocyte adhesion molecule-1, limiting leukocyte migration, reversible inhibition of phagocytosis, inhibition of phospholipase A2, inhibition of prostaglandins, inhibition of thromboxane release, inhibition of leukotriene release, inhibition of histamine release, reduction in free radical formation, and inhibition of cytokine release. Additionally, Lidocaine injection is proposed to alleviate nerve entrapment within fascia through hydrodissection, a technique being effectively utilized in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scar deactivation is the technique of inserting acupuncture needles at a 30-45 degree angle into the superficial fascia to surround a scar. It is postulated that needle insertion into connective tissue produces analgesia through a multifaceted process encompassing the disruption and remodeling of extracellular matrix in loose connective tissue, alterations in gene expression affecting neurotransmitter levels, and cellular signaling pathways impacted in response to fibroblast and mast-cell involvement. In traditional Chinese medicine, injuries resulting in scar tissue formation are thought of as areas of blood and subsequently Qi stagnation. Disruptions in the flow of Qi at the point of scar tissue can result in abnormal skin sensations such as pain, itching, and numbness in addition to systemic effects. A case report has demonstrated effective pain relief in with an acupuncture protocol utilizing scar deactivation technique.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date January 2025
Est. primary completion date January 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility **Patients must be able to get care at Nellis Air Force Base or Scott AFB (a military installation) in order to participate in this study.** Inclusion Criteria: - Female DoD beneficiaries age 18 years or older - 3 months or greater postpartum with abdominal and/or back pain starting after low transverse Cesarean section scar. - If subject has had prior Scar Deactivation with Surface Release Technique for cesarean section scar they must have completed a washout period of 12 weeks or more. Exclusion Criteria: - Pregnant - Prior Scar Deactivation with Surface Release Technique for cesarean section scar within the last 12 weeks. - Ever had Prior Scar Infiltration with Lidocaine for cesarean section. - Active cellulitis surrounding scar - Revision of Cesarean section scar - Vertical incision or emergent Cesarean section

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Scar Deactivation Surface Release Technique protocol
? Alternating placement of Spring Ten (0.30x40 mm) acupuncture needles to surround scar left in place for a treatment duration of 20 minutes. Needles will be placed at intervals of 1cm to 1.5 cm and will surround the scar with a maximum of 20 needles per treatment.
Scar Infiltration with 0.25-1% Lidocaine
? Will consist of calculation of 3 mg/kg dose of 0.5-1% Lidocaine and a dermal followed by subcutaneous injection using 1.5 inch 25 G needle and syringe appropriate for volume based on calculated dose.
Physical therapy
? Will be a referral to physical therapy specifying McKenzie protocol treatment for the presenting complaint. The McKenzie protocol is a form of standard of care physical therapy in which the physical therapist tries to find a cause and effect relationship between the positions the patient usually assumes while sitting, standing, or moving, and the location of pain because of those positions or activities. The therapeutic approach requires a patient to move through a series of activities and test movement to gauge the patient's pain response. The approach then uses that information to develop an exercise program designed to centralize or alleviate the pain.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States 375th Medical Group Scott Air Force Base Illinois

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jennifer Loomis Mike O'Callaghan Military Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (15)

Brobyn TL, MK Chung, and PJ LaRiccia "Neural therapy: An overlooked game changer for patients suffering chronic pain?" J Pain Relief 2015;4: 184.

Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Mar;50(3):265-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00936.x. — View Citation

Egli S, Pfister M, Ludin SM, Puente de la Vega K, Busato A, Fischer L. Long-term results of therapeutic local anesthesia (neural therapy) in 280 referred refractory chronic pain patients. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jun 27;15:200. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0735-z. — View Citation

Fang S. The successful treatment of pain associated with scar tissue using acupuncture. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2014 Oct;7(5):262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 24. — View Citation

Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology. 2000 Sep;93(3):858-75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200009000-00038. No abstract available. — View Citation

Liddle CE, Harris RE. Cellular Reorganization Plays a Vital Role in Acupuncture Analgesia. Med Acupunct. 2018 Feb 1;30(1):15-20. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1258. — View Citation

Loos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):839-46. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a4efa. — View Citation

Malone, D, T Clark, and N Wei. "Ultrasound-guided percutaneous injection, hydrodissection, and fenestration for carpal tunnel syndrome: description of a new technique." Journal of Applied Research. 2010;10(3):116-123.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Jan;66(1):1. — View Citation

Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today. 2014 Mar;44(3):405-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0591-8. Epub 2013 May 9. — View Citation

Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Mar 1;93(5):380-7. — View Citation

Srinivasan R, Greenbaum DS. Chronic abdominal wall pain: a frequently overlooked problem. Practical approach to diagnosis and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):824-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05662.x. — View Citation

Suleiman S, Johnston DE. The abdominal wall: an overlooked source of pain. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Aug 1;64(3):431-8. — View Citation

Wasserman JB, Steele-Thornborrow JL, Yuen JS, Halkiotis M, Riggins EM. Chronic caesarian section scar pain treated with fascial scar release techniques: A case series. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Oct;20(4):906-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 10. — View Citation

Weinschenk S. "Neural therapy--A review of the therapeutic use of local anesthetics" Acupuncture and Related Therapies 2012.

* Note: There are 15 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) between each time frame The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used.
The goal for pain reductions will be 50% as a primary outcome.
time 0, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Primary Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) between each time frame The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of the total score of two numeric scales measured by the patient and a qualified observer. Each scale assesses the scar by six characteristics on 10-point scales with a 1 corresponding to normal skin and a 10 representing the worst imaginable condition for that characteristic. The Total Score of both scales is calculated by summing scores of the six items resulting in a range of 6 to 60. The POSAS is treated as an interval variable; therefore, parametric methods will be used for this outcome. time 0, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Secondary Single question asking if subjects' expectations were met? -- Binary yes/no Ask if the subjects' expectations were met regarding physical therapies/lidocaine/acupuncture effectiveness for chronic, post-surgical pain related to low transverse Cesarean Section. Answer is Yes/No. 20 weeeks
Secondary Single question asking subjects' change in pain severity reported as a percentile (10%, 20%, ...) Report as a percentage, where the greater the percent the greater the pain reduction. 20 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Completed NCT01706848 - Celotres for Improvement in Wound Healing and Resulting Scar Consequences Following Suturing of a Wound N/A
Recruiting NCT01177358 - Botox in the Healing of Surgical Wounds of the Neck Phase 2
Terminated NCT01459666 - Forehead Scars Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Reconstruction for Skin Cancer Phase 4
Completed NCT00970671 - Treatment of Surgical Scars Using the Pulsed Dye Laser N/A
Recruiting NCT03561376 - Zinc Oxide Versus Petrolatum Following Skin Surgery Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05293652 - Effect of Hydrocortisone Iontophoresis Versus Hydrocortisone Phonophoresis On Post Surgical Scar N/A
Recruiting NCT03406143 - Evaluation of the Effect of CGF in Promoting Mechanical-stretch Induced in Vivo Skin Regeneration N/A
Completed NCT05527756 - Evaluation of the Cosmetic Outcomes of Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery
Completed NCT02886988 - Early Postoperative Prevention and Treatment of Median Sternotomy Scars With Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05618912 - Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment N/A
Recruiting NCT05408117 - Impact of Suture Type on Pigment Disturbances in Patients of Skin of Color N/A
Completed NCT04169438 - Pilot Study Investigating a Restorative Wound Care Cream Together With Petrolatum on Surgical Excisions N/A
Terminated NCT02520557 - An Exploratory Study of Genetic and Clinical Factors for Serious Skin Reactions Among Users of Eslicarbazepine Acetate
Not yet recruiting NCT04621994 - Cesarean Wound Closure: Dermabond Versus Steri Strips N/A
Withdrawn NCT03395678 - Acne Scarring in Skin of Color: Laser vs Microneedling N/A
Completed NCT02744950 - Comparison of Scar Results and Time for Closures of Scalp Defects Via Pulley Sutures or Layered Repairs N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01005992 - Fractional Photothermolysis for the Treatment of Burn Scars Phase 1
Completed NCT04870008 - Aesthetic Outcome of Running Cuticular Suture Distance (2mm vs 5mm) N/A
Recruiting NCT04506255 - Silicone Taping for the Improvement of Abdominal Donor Site Scars N/A