View clinical trials related to Scar; Previous Cesarean Section.
Filter by:caesarean section rate in Egypt has reached about 60% between primgravidae. Wound complications are of the most common morbidities following cesarean section. The prevalence of wound infection and disruption after cesarean has been reported as 3-15%, averagely speaking 6% and 2-42% in various studies. These complications affect mother's quality of life due to stress, anxiety, delay in mother's ability and health recovery
To investigate the effect of 10,600 nm CO2 laser combined with Zimmer Cryo 6 forced cold air device on the comfort and efficacy of patients with burn scars or post-operative linear scars, and to provide a safer, more effective and more satisfactory program for clinical treatment of burn scars or post-operative linear scars.
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a relative "new" type of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilized egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous cesarean section. A recent review amounts almost 31 different treatment modalities for CSP. A broad spectrum of options represents a real challenge for the health care provider. The choice may be made among expectant management, medical treatment, local treatment and surgical approach, also combined together. There is insufficient evidence to recommend any one specific intervention over another for caesarean scar pregnancy. Future studies are needed to define the optimal management of pregnancy for caesarean section scars. Thus, we aim to compare the success rate of two different treatment of CSP: the medical management by using two-dose of Methotrexate (MTX) followed by dilation and evacuation (D&E) compared to single dose of two-dose of Methotrexate followed by hysperoscopic approach.
This is pilot quasi-experimental study of women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries who are now pregnant and eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean delivery, to assess whether a decision aid, providing knowledge about trial of labor (VBAC) and planned repeat cesarean delivery can improve the birth options decision-making process for patients. Participants are screened for eligibility through electronic health records. Once an individual is screened eligible, and email invite is sent providing information about the study and assessing the interest in participation. An on-line consent is completed and women are entered sequentially into the usual care group and then through further recruitment, another sample of women are entered into the decision aid group. The primary outcome is satisfaction with the shared decision-making process with their provider.
This prospective, clinical, observational study compares preoperative and intraoperative sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment of women who underwent ≥ second cesarean section. It is the purpose of the study to assess transabdominal (linear/convex ultrasound probe) and transvaginal approach versus intraoperative sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment.
This prospective, clinical, observational trial compares the measured value with quantitative ultrasonic (preoperatively) Elastic modulus E (kPA) with the measured value with quantitative ultrasonic Elastic modulus E (kPA) in vitro (postoperatively) and with the experimental measurement done in vitro (postoperatively) of lower uterine segment of women who underwent second cesarean section.
There is limited application of the use of PRP in obstetrics, therefore there is a need for assessment if it is efficacy in improving skin wound healing in cesarean section.
This prospective, controlled, clinical, intervention study measures the number of uterine Cesarean section scars and median myometrial thickness of women who underwent two Cesarean sections six to nine months after their last Cesarean section using transvaginal ultrasound. It is the purpose of the study to assess if a resection of the uterine scar from a previous Cesarean section during a second Cesarean section could lead to a decrease in risk for subsequent pregnancies.