Clinical Trials Logo

Satisfaction clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Satisfaction.

Filter by:
  • Enrolling by invitation  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05627193 Enrolling by invitation - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Post-operative Breast Surgery Patients Having Physical Clinic and Tele Clinic Follow up: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PSPVT
Start date: December 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Purpose of this study is to measure patient satisfaction in standard Post- operative Breast Outpatient clinics versus teleclinics. Post operative breast surgery patients who volunteer for this study will be randomized into either of the two groups Standard outpatient physical clinics or Telephone clinic and their satisfaction will be measured afterwards using a validated standardized questionnaire by a assessor who will be blind to the type of follow up. This will be a single blinded randomized controlled trial.

NCT ID: NCT03864588 Enrolling by invitation - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

Comparing Ropivacaine Adductor Canal Blockade by Surgeon Versus Anesthesiologist

Start date: October 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two methods of administering an adductor canal block (ACB) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA); intraoperative surgeon performed intra-articular adductor canal block (IACB) and anesthesiologist ultrasound guided ADC in the post-anesthesia recovery unit (PACU).

NCT ID: NCT03468608 Enrolling by invitation - Satisfaction Clinical Trials

Development and Validation of a Pediatric Procedural Sedation Satisfaction Survey

Start date: September 26, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The quality of care associated with medical procedures, such as procedural sedation, has historically been assessed from the perspective of the healthcare professional, wherein the appropriateness of the services provided and the skill with which this care was performed were considered. However, more recently, the perspectives of consumers of healthcare services (i.e. the patients) have also been sought in the form of patient satisfaction. A review of the literature shows that patient satisfaction is routinely assessed when determining the effectiveness of sedation; however, it is less frequently assessed as the primary outcome. In child-specific, validated studies, limitations are noted with respect to being validated in a language other than English and failing to encompass a variety of procedures. As a result, these validated tools are not appropriate for use with pediatric populations undergoing procedural sedation in North America, nor are these validated tools amenable to comparison with our proposed tool.