View clinical trials related to Sarcoma, Soft Tissue.
Filter by:The goal of this type of study: clinical trial is to observe the efficacy and safety of cardunilizumab in soft tissue sarcomas after failure of at least first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapeutic agents, including undifferentiated sarcoma (UPS), smooth muscle sarcoma, mucinous fibrosarcoma, and poorly differentiated/undifferentiated/polymorphic liposarcoma, etc.) . The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Cardunilizumab is effective in soft tissue sarcomas after failure of at least first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapeutic agents, including undifferentiated sarcoma (UPS),smooth muscle sarcoma, mucinous fibrosarcoma, and poorly differentiated/undifferentiated/polymorphic liposarcoma) is effective . - Cardunilizumab has manageable adverse effects. Participants will be given Cardunolizumab 6mg/kg once every 2 weeks free
The purpose of this study is to test whether the study drug, niraparib, is effective against unresectable and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with DDR mutations. The researchers will also study whether niraparib is safe and causes few or mild side effects, and whether there are groups of DDR mutations in soft tissue sarcoma cells that respond better to treatment with niraparib.
This is a multi-center, open-label, single-arm study that in Phase 1b will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/ recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety of L-Annamycin and in Phase 2 will explore the efficacy of L- Annamycin as a single agent for the treatment of subjects with STS with lung metastases for which chemotherapy is considered appropriate.
This study is being done to find out whether the study drug Retifanlimab, a monoclonal antibody against the PD-1 protein, combined with gemcitabine and docetaxel, is a safe and effective treatment for your disease. Gemcitabine and docetaxel are chemotherapy drugs that are commonly used to treat soft tissue sarcoma. Retifanlimab is an experimental drug that boosts the immune system's ability to fight cancer cells. The study researchers think that Retifanlimab may help gemcitabine and docetaxel work better against soft tissue sarcoma that is either locally advanced or has spread beyond its original location (metastasized), and it cannot be removed with surgery (unresectable).
Phase I, multicentre clinical trial of olaratumab plus trabectedin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Olaratumab plus trabectedin could be synergistic and with a manageable toxicity profile in advanced STS. The study is a phase I, non-randomised, one-armed, multicenter trial, open-label. The dose escalation rules include patients in blocks of 3 o 6 patient. Treatment is a combination of unlimited cycles of oralatumab and trabectedin. Primary clinical study endpoint of phase I: - Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the recommended dose of olaratumab combined with trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma Secondary clinical study endpoints: - Objective Response Rate (ORR): ORR is defined as the number of subjects with a Best Overall Response (BOR) according to RECIST 1.1. - Progression free survival (PFS): time to progression or death from treatment initiation. - Overall survival (OS): Time from treatment initiation until death. Efficacy measured through tumor response according to Choi criteria. The evaluation criteria will be based on the identification of target lesions in baseline and their follow-up until tumor progression. - Correlation of clinical outcome with translational biomarkers. - Quality of life (QoL) measured per QLQ-C30 questionnaire of EORTC
Single agent, non-randomized, open label expansion in select sarcoma patients including myxoid liposarcoma and other sarcomas that share similar chromosomal translocations to Ewing sarcoma; AND dose expansion of the combination of seclidemstat with topotecan and cyclophosphamide in patients with Ewing sarcoma
No prospective data exist about long term morbidity and quality of life after multivisceral surgical resection for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS). In order to assess the safety of this surgical approach and the effect on the Quality of Life over the long period we propose a prospective observational study. The hypothesis is that the surgical treatment has no significant impact in determining a lower Quality of Life in the long term. Objectives Primary objective Estimate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the "global health status / QoL" scale in patients primarily treated for localized RSTS, as determined in QLQ-C30 version 3.0. Secondary objectives - Evaluate the long term morbidity of aggressive surgical approach to RSTS in terms of renal failure. - Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of DN4 / LEFS / BPI questionnaires. - Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the following scales from QLC-C30: PF2, RF2, EF, CF, SF, FA, FI. - Evaluate the difference between baseline and 4 and 12 months scores of the following scales and single items from QLC-C29: Blood and mucus in stool, Stool frequency, Sexual interest, Impotence, Dyspareunia. - To correlate the surgical resection pattern (number and type of organs resected) and the tumor features (size, grading and histological subtype) with the long-term morbidity and quality of life. Eligibility Inclusion criteria - Adult patients (age > 18 years) with primary localized RSTS surgically treated at our institution - Written, voluntary, informed consent Exclusion criteria - Recurrent disease
Children with sarcomas are routinely assessed with a variety of imaging techniques that involve the use of ionizing radiation. These include computed tomography (CT), nuclear bone scan, and positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT). Pediatric sarcoma patients undergo many imaging studies at the time of diagnosis, during therapy and for years following completion of therapy. Because children are in a stage of rapid growth, their tissues and organs are more susceptible to the harmful effects of ionizing radiation than are adults. Furthermore, compared to adults, children have a longer life expectancy and, therefore, a longer period of time in which to develop the adverse sequelae of radiation exposure, such as the development of second malignancies. Alternative experimental methods of measuring tumor response will be compared to current standard of care measures to determine if the experimental method is equivalent to methods currently being used. Investigators wish to determine if they can reduce patient's exposure to the harmful effects of ionizing radiation by replacing imaging studies that use radiation with whole body diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) which does not use any radiation. They also want to know if DW-MRI measurements of the tumor can tell how well the tumor is responding to therapy. There have been studies in adults with cancer that have shown that DW-MRI provides useful information about how tumors are responding to therapy. There have only been very small studies of DW-MRI in children with tumors in the body. Therefore, the role of DW-MRI in pediatric sarcoma patients is not yet known and it is still experimental. This study might give us important information that could help us treat other children with bone or soft tissue sarcomas in the future.
The main purpose of this study is to gather information about the use of an investigational drug called IMC-3G3 with a drug for soft tissue sarcoma called doxorubicin.
The goal of this trial is to determine whether oral continuous (metronomic) therapy with trofosfamide results in a similar rate of progression-free time after 6 months as intravenous treatment with adriamycin. In addition, the study is intended to investigate the level of toxicity associated with the two treatment regimens (safety profile).