View clinical trials related to Root Resorption.
Filter by:Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of photobiomodulation therapies on root resorption compared with the placebo group. Materials and Methods: 30 patients, who were admitted to the …………. University Faculty of Dentistry Orthodontics Department for treatment, with an indication of upper right 1st premolar tooth extraction was included. Before the individuals' orthodontic treatment, 0.022 slot MBT brackets and tubes were placed on the maxillary 1st premolar and molar. A 150g buccal tipping force was applied to the 1st premolar. Individuals were then randomly divided into 3 groups. For the first group; laser application was performed with a 810 nm GaAlAs laser device at 0,3,7,14,21 and 28 days to 8 J/cm2. Second group; an LED application according to the manufacturer's instructions with a 850 nm wavelength and 20 mW/cm2 output power for 10 minutes per day during the experiment. Third group; a placebo therapy was completed whereby a laser device that did not make active pulses was used. At the end of four weeks, the amount of root surface resorption was compared using micro-CT imaging after the extraction of the teeth.
The prevalence of external root resorption and distal caries in mandibular second molars associated with impacted mandibular third molars will be detected in addition to the association of the risk factors.
Since root resorption is a frequent consequence of orthodontic treatment, DSP are non-collagenous dentin-specific matrix proteins postulated to be involved in the mineralization of pre-dentin into dentin. Calculating the amount of DSP -Dentine Sialo Protein- produced upon root resorption might be an indicative biological marker for root resorption
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the extent of root resorption in the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment with the use of different types of brackets. Materials and methods: The study consisted of 21 patients (11 males and 10 females) within the age group of 16-25 years, having bimaxillary protrusion. They were divided into three groups. In Group 1- Conventional brackets, Group 2- Self-ligation brackets:Smart Clip (Passive), and in Group 3 Self-ligation brackets: Empower (Active) were bonded. Computed Tomography scans and Orthopantomograms were taken before start of treatment and after six months of retraction. Root resorption is computed as the difference between the pre treatment total tooth length and the post treatment total tooth length.
This study will attempt to validate a method of estimating root length on panoramic radiograph by crown measurement on intraoral digital scans.
Labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets. The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.
Orthodontic treatment has been traditionally carried out with fixed appliances involving the use of stainless steel brackets and archwires. The challenge has been to move teeth and their roots effectively while minimizing iatrogenic damage such as root resorption and gingival inflammation. In recent years, with the development of new appliances and brackets such as self-ligating brackets and clear aligners there have been reports of improved periodontal status, less iatrogenic root damage and improved hygiene during treatment. Although these treatment modalities have been rapidly accepted in clinical practice, both clinical and basic science research data regarding their overall biological compatibility to support higher levels of evidence based dentistry (e.g, randomized clinical trials) is lacking. In other words, their advantages and disadvantages in this regard have not yet been scientifically evaluated. Such quantification will provide invaluable information for improvements in these treatment modalities. A randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to test the following hypothesis (H) up to 18 months into treatment: H-1: There is no difference in the amount of root resorption caused by the three different appliances. H-2: Gingival health is not affected by the 'type of appliance' being used to correct the malocclusion. H-3: There is no difference in the amount of bacterial count and the type of appliance being used for orthodontic treatment. The hypothesis will be tested with the following specific aims (SA): SA-1: To investigate the amount of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption generated by treatment. SA-2: To evaluate the periodontal health of the patients with the different appliance systems. SA-3: To determine the changes in Streptococcus mutans and total bacterial counts contained in the plaque of orthodontic patients. SA-4: To ascertain whether there is an association between the microbial count and the type of appliance being used for orthodontic treatment
The intended study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing and contrasting the effect of mini-screw implant anchorage-assisted versus regular maximum anchorage by retracting the maxillary incisors.
The purpose of the study is evaluate the histological changes of the dentinal-pulp complex and root resorption in maxillary premolars with intrusive orthodontic movement under a low power laser effects.
Tooth-root resorption, also known as shortening or erosion,(TRR) is one of the adverse outcomes of dental trauma, orthodontic tooth movement and dental replantation/transplantation. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) is somewhat different from other types of TRR. The treatment protocol of teeth diagnosed with severe OIIRR or other forms of TRR always involves root canal treatment or extraction of these teeth in severe cases and prosthetic replacement. Sometimes teeth with minor TRR may stay for an extended period of time with compromised bite functions. Although several trials have been proposed to minimize or prevent TRR or OIIRR, none is capable of being used in clinical situation to treat TRR or OIIRR in humans except for Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS). However, research examining the use of LIPUS to treat OIIRR has been limited to simple orthodontic tooth tipping. In reality, tooth movement is a combination of different types of tooth movements, namely tipping, bodily, rotational, torque, intrusion and extrusion tooth movements. However, the literature have pointed out that torque tooth movement, especially when the root apices are torques against cortical plates of bone produces the most dramatic type of tooth root resorption with poor prognosis. Our long-term goal is to develop a standard protocol for treating severe tooth root resorption with poor prognosis in humans, regardless of origin. Our preliminary data demonstrates that LIPUS can produce healing of OIIRR in humans after simple tipping movement, this was confirmed by an in-vitro study on isolated cementoblasts. The objective of the present proposal is to evaluate the effect of different treatment protocols of LIPUS on the healing process of orthodontically induced tooth-root resorption due to torque (Complex)type of tooth movement in humans. The study Hypotheses are (I) LIPUS treatment for 20 minutes per day for 4 weeks will be effective in repairing OIIRR due to torque tooth movement. (II) The stimulatory effect of LIPUS to repair OIIRR due to torque tooth movement than LIPUS treatment is dose and time dependent.