View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:To expand knowledge on the application and tolerability of immunotherapy with LAIS® Mites allergoid tablets as well as knowledge on the alleviation of symptoms during sublingual therapy in special consideration of the chosen titration schedule in everyday practice.
To demonstrate superiority of ALK HDM tablets versus placebo in immune response, measured as change of D.farinae specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) from baseline to end of treatment with ALK HDM tablets given once daily over 60 days.
There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. The current therapeutic dose regimen for Grass MATA MPL is a course of four injections of 300, 800, 2000 and 2000 SU (Standardized Units), administered at weekly intervals (cumulative dose 5100 SU). Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 SU and 18200 SU are being developed to compare with the current dose. The study is designed to explore the benefit/risk of increasing the cumulative allergen dose of the Grass MATA MPL immunotherapy comparing these doses with the current dose of Grass MATA MPL, Grass MATA (without MPL) and placebo.
To observe the efficacy of Sanfu herbal patch and Sanfu moxibustion on persistent allergic rhinitis,and comparing the differences between the combination of these 2 methods with each method alone.
The purpose of this non interventional study (NIS) was to observe the efficacy of Pollinex® Quattro as a short-term revaccination in patients who have already been successfully desensitized at least five years ago against grass-pollen but developed a recurrent allergy.
Efficacy and adverse effects of Ginger extract in treating allergic rhinitis patients compared with Loratadine.The double blind randomized controlled trial study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University NO.1.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of Bilastine on patients' attention and reactivity levels by measuring psychophysical performance at a F1-high speed simulator driving test.
There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 and 18200 SU (Standardized Units) are being developed to compare with the current dose of 5100 SU. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and safety of these two new cumulative dose regimens of Grass MATA MPL compared with placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) due to grass pollen, to enable selection of the best dose to go into a larger scale study to assess the efficacy and safety of the higher cumulative doses.
The purpose of this study is to assess safety, tolerability and demonstrate a dose response signal using Total Symptom Score (TSS), based on challenges with grass pollen in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC), followed by estimation of the minimum effective dose of SUBLIVAC FIX Phleum (SP) after 10 months of treatment compared to placebo. The study has 4 treatment groups: 3 different doses of SP and placebo will be tested.
Allergen challenge facilities have been utilized for many years in clinical drug trials studying onset of action, proof of concept, duration of action, and efficacy. Each facility has somewhat different design characteristics and pollen dispersal technologies. Facilities are located in disparate geographic areas and have populations of participants who are sensitized to allergens unique to that area. Therefore, facilities have operated as single sites with little effort to evaluate facility comparability or to attempt standardization across facilities. The purpose of this study is to compare the two sites and assess whether the sites are able to achieve similar symptom scores.