View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:In this study subjects self recorded nasal and ocular symptoms scores from exposure to ragweed pollen in an Allergen Challenge Chamber (ACC). This single site study of seasonal allergic rhinitis was designed to enroll up to 35 participants. These participants would be age 18-70, male and female, with a mixture of ethnic groups. The study would involve 2 phases: Screening and Exposure. In the Exposure phase, participants were exposed to pollen for up to 180 minutes.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).
This research aims to establish a panel of inflammatory biomarkers of the early (Histamine, Tryptase, ProstaglandineD2) and late (Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-13, Eotaxin, Tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF), (Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1beta (MIP1ß)) phase response to nasal bolus allergen challenge (NAC) in subjects with out-of-season seasonal allergic rhinitis, suitable for future application in drug intervention studies of novel anti-allergy therapeutics.
A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FDC olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal spray (Molo; also referred as GSP 301) was conducted in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens (BID and QD) of the FDC (i.e. Molo 1 and Molo 2) were evaluated compared to placebo nasal spray, DYMISTA® and PATANASE®.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate changes in nasal airflow caused by loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg (Claritin D) tablet and fluticasone propionate 50 mcg per spray nasal spray (Flonase) in subjects suffering from nasal congestion and other allergy symptoms.
To assess the reproducibility of the allergic response in the cat allergic subjects, measured as the change from baseline of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) on the two challenge days.
To determine the effect of Montelukast in Asthma and Allergic rhinits patients
1. To compare the effectiveness of Benjakul extract capsules at 300 mg per day with Loratadine drug in the treatment of allergic rhinitis patients in small group (Clinical Trial Phase II). 2. To study the safety and side effects of Benjakul extract capsules 300 mg per day and Loratadine drug for allergic rhinitis patients.
The objective is to prospectively explore associations between immunological parameters in blood and clinical effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in children with severe allergy towards pollen. Half of the children will receive SCIT while the other half will start SCIT after the study is finished. Clinical evaluations of symptoms and an immunological survey will be performed before start of SCIT and after one year of treatment. Some of the immunological parameters will also be checked after 6 months of treatment
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab compared with placebo, on top of SoC (anti-histamine and nasal corticosteroid) in adult and adolescent patients with severe Japanese cedar pollinosis, whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite the current recommended therapies (nasal corticosteroids plus one or more medications out of anti-histamine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, or prostaglandin D2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist) in the previous 2 Japanese cedar pollen seasons.