View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic.
Filter by:Treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis and chronic polypous rhinosinusitis with olfactory mucosa-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Gathering knowledge on the use of Dymista® in Asian patients who receive Dymista® for the first time in routine clinical practice
The investigators is now carrying out a clinical study of Umbilical cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells (UCMSCs) in the treatment of Allergic rhinitis (AR). UCMSCs is known to its multilineage differentiation potential, strong proliferation ability, low immunogenicity, convenient material acquisition, and fewer restrictions on ethical and moral issues. The investigators hope to find a novel, minimally invasive, effective and simple treatment for the large number of patients with persistent moderate to severe AR.
The study seeks to understand patients' satisfaction and importance of treatment attributes for Allergic Rhinitis nasal sprays from two brands (RYALTRIS® vs. DYMISTA®).
A real world evidence study that aims to understand the impact of RYALTRIS® nasal spray in patients with Allergic Rhinitis over a 28-day period.
The main goal of this trial is to learn more about the safety of repeated dosing with Lu AG09222. The trial doctors will keep track of the participant's overall health by asking them how they are and by analyzing blood and urine samples.
Alleviation of allergic symptoms induced by house dust mites when using the medical device AM-301. This clinical investigation explores the efficacy and safety of AM-301 when used to reduce symptoms of house dust mite sufferers. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of AM-301 Device between treated and non-treated subjects in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
The aim of the study will be to investigate the prevalence of of sensitization to peach and/or cypress in potato sensitized patients, based on the collection of medical data from patient records consulting in the Allergy Unit of the Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital. Some Gibberellin-regulated protein (GRP) in fruits and pollens have been identified as allergen, and peach GRP (peamaclein) has recently emerged as a relevant food allergen in cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients. Multiple fruit allergies might be related to cross-reactivity between GRPs. Peamaclein shares 82% identity with snakin-1 from potato. Thus, because of this hight homology the investigators want to determine the prevalence of cosensitization between these 3 allergens potato, peach and cypress.
The purpose of this allergen challenge study is to assess the efficacy of IRL201104 compared with placebo in adult participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
WHO recommend to divide AR into 4 subgroups according to the symptom frequency (intermittent or persistent) and severity (mild or moderate-to-severe). For the persistent moderate-to-severe AR subgroup, the guideline suggests to treat with intranasal corticosteroid (INS) plus antihistamines (AH1) for 2-4 weeks. If the symptom is controlled then degrade the treatment (usually with INS) and maintenance for more than 4 weeks. However, up to 70% of patients suffering from AR do not follow treatment recommendation, they stopped medication when they feel better. This behavior always leads to uncontrolled AR, which has been identified as a high-risk factor of induction and exacerbation of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis. A recent survey showed that AR patients prefer to an on-demand treatment rather than continuous treatment. In general, poor adherence is always a considerable issue for all long-term treatments. Previous studies have shown that as dosing frequency increases, the adherence rate decreases. Thus, less medication frequency is an important factor to optimize the management of chronic diseases including AR. Intranasal AH1 can relieve AR symptoms including sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal itching in 3 to 5 minutes, while INS can inhibit the underlying mucous allergic inflammation and is recommended as the first-line medication for moderate-to-severe AR. INS combined AH1 have shown a synergic effect on control AR inflammation and provide rapid AR symptom relief. Investigators hypothesis that the on-demand administration of INS combined AH1 can achieve similar AR control level with less dosing frequency as compared to the daily INS maintenance in controlled moderate-to-severe AR patients.